World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
5668
World Ranking
8357
National Ranking
3568

Georgia A. Bishop publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Georgia A. Bishop sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 107 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Georgia A. Bishop D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Georgia A. Bishop sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Georgia A. Bishop is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their academic profile indicates engagement in research and scholarship without specific details on individual papers or collaborative networks.

While details on recent papers, frequent co-authors, and publication venues are not provided, the affiliation with a major research university suggests involvement in ongoing scholarly activities within their field.

Information on main and subfields of study, as well as primary topics of work, is not available, limiting insights into their precise research focus.

There are no records of book publications or awards which could further delineate their academic contributions or recognitions.

The data shows that Georgia A. Bishop is currently living, allowing for the possibility of continued academic engagement.

Best Publications

  • Bardet-Biedl syndrome proteins are required for the localization of G protein-coupled receptors to primary cilia.

    Nicolas F. Berbari;Jacqueline S. Lewis;Georgia A. Bishop;Candice C. Askwith

  • Medium spiny neuron projection from the rat striatum: An intracellular horseradish peroxidase study

    R.J. Preston;G.A. Bishop;S.T. Kitai

  • Type III adenylyl cyclase localizes to primary cilia throughout the adult mouse brain

    Georgia A. Bishop;Nicolas F. Berbari;Jacqueline Lewis;Kirk Mykytyn

  • Increased expression of the glial glutamate transporter EAAT2 modulates excitotoxicity and delays the onset but not the outcome of ALS in mice

    Hong Guo;Liching Lai;E R E R Matthew Butchbach;Michael P. Stockinger

  • Morphological and physiological properties of neostriatal neurons: an intracellular horseradish peroxidase study in the rat.

    G.A. Bishop;H.T. Chang;S.T. Kitai

  • The distribution and origin of serotonin immunoreactivity in the rat cerebellum

    G.A. Bishop;R.H. Ho

  • Electrophysiological and horseradish peroxidase studies of precerebellar afferents to the nucleus interpositus anterior. I. Climbing fiber system.

    S.T. Kitai;R.A. McCrea;R.J. Preston;G.A. Bishop

  • Morphological and electrophysiological characteristics of projection neurons in the nucleus interpositus of the cat cerebellum.

    R. A. McCrea;G. A. Bishop;S. T. Kitai

  • Hippocampal neurons possess primary cilia in culture.

    Nicolas F. Berbari;Georgia A. Bishop;Candice C. Askwith;Jacqueline S. Lewis

  • Evidence that apoptosis of activated T cells occurs in spontaneous tolerance of liver allografts and is blocked by manipulations which break tolerance.

    A. Sharland;Yiqun Yan;Chuanmin Wang;D. G. Bowen

  • Kinetics of intragraft cytokine expression, cellular infiltration, and cell death in rejection of renal allografts compared with acceptance of liver allografts in a rat model: early activation and apoptosis is associated with liver graft acceptance.

    A. Sharland;S. Shastry;Chuanmin Wang;K. Rokahr

  • Ionic Channels and Conductance Based Models for Hypothalamic Neuronal Thermosensitivity

    Martin Wechselberger;Chadwick L. Wright;Georgia A. Bishop;Jack A. Boulant

  • Tolerance To Rat Liver Allografts: I. Differences Between Tolerance and Rejection Are More Marked in the B Cell Compared with the T Cell or Cytokine Response

    Junhong Sun;G. W. Mccaughan;Y. Matsumoto;A. G. R. Sheil

  • Neuromodulatory effects of corticotropin releasing factor on cerebellar purkinje cells: An in vivo study in the cat

    G.A. Bishop

  • Allele non-amplification: a source of confusion in linkage studies employing microsatellite polymorphisms

    D J Koorey;G A Bishop;G W McCaughan

  • Topographical organization in the origin of serotoninergic projections to different regions of the cat cerebellar cortex

    Christopher W. H. Kerr;Georgia A. Bishop

  • Distribution of corticotropin‐releasing factor in the cerebellum and precerbellar nuclei of the opossum: A study utilizing immunohistochemistry, In situ hybridization histochemistry, and receptor autoradiography

    Sharon L. Cummings;W. Scott Young;Georgia A. Bishop;James S. King

  • The pattern of distribution of the local axonal collaterals of Purkinje cells in the intermediate cortex of the anterior lobe and paramedian lobule of the cat cerebellum.

    Georgia A. Bishop

  • Intracellular staining of Purkinje cells and their axons with horseradish peroxidase.

    R.A. McCrea;G.A. Bishop;S.T. Kitai

  • Distribution of tyrosine hydroxylase‐immunoreactive afferents to the cerebellum differs between species

    Thomas E. Nelson;James S. King;Georgia A. Bishop

  • Electrophysiological and horseradish peroxidase studies of precerebellar afferents to the nucleus interpositus anterior. II. Mossy fiber system

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

James S. King
James S. King The Ohio State University
Geoffrey W. McCaughan
Geoffrey W. McCaughan University of Sydney
Robert A. McCrea
Robert A. McCrea University of Chicago
David Bowen
David Bowen Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Ian E. Alexander
Ian E. Alexander University of Sydney
Stephen I. Alexander
Stephen I. Alexander Children's Hospital at Westmead
Patrick Bertolino
Patrick Bertolino Centenary Institute of Cancer Medicine and Cell Biology
W. Scott Young
W. Scott Young National Institutes of Health
Errol B. De Souza
Errol B. De Souza National Institute on Drug Abuse
Eric J. Gowans
Eric J. Gowans University of Adelaide

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Neuroscience, there are several related fields and online degrees that offer promising career pathways. Many students find connections between neuroscience and counseling, psychology, or therapy, making these areas excellent options for further study or career pivots.

For those considering careers in counseling, exploring the best online cacrep counseling programs is a smart starting point. These programs are tailored to meet professional standards and can lead to licensure in various states. If affordability is a key concern, check out the cheapest online lpc programs that prepare you for a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) credential.

Those interested in supporting families can dive into an lmft degree online to become a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist. Additionally, for a broader foundation in human behavior, psychology students can pursue masters programs in psychology that open doors to clinical, research, and educational careers.

Best Scientists Citing Georgia A. Bishop