World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
35
Citations
6604
World Ranking
8908
National Ranking
2481

George T. Gillies publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George T. Gillies sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 195 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

George T. Gillies D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George T. Gillies sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow, National Academy of Inventors
  • 2007 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For enduring contributions to the development of magnetic stereotaxis His inventions already are guiding catheters to critical regions of the human heart Current research may lead to delivery of medications to the brain as well
  • 2004 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

George T. Gillies is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their research spans across multiple fields, predominantly Medicine and Physics and Astronomy, with a focus on several specialized subfields. These include Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, and Physiology.

Gillies's research topics cover a range of subjects in pain management and treatment, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, quantum mechanics and applications, spine and intervertebral disc pathology, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, relativity and gravitational theory, and geophysics and sensor technology.

Recent publications from Gillies include:

  • "Risk Factors and Survival Analysis of Spinal Cord Stimulator Explantation" (2020) published in Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface
  • "The Sagnac effect and the role of simultaneity in relativity theory" (2021) published in Journal of Modern Optics
  • "Spinal Cord Stimulation for Visceral Pain: Present Approaches and Future Strategies" (2020) published in Pain Medicine
  • "Biomarker Optimization of Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapies" (2020) published in Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface
  • "In Vivo Testing of a Prototype Intradural Spinal Cord Stimulator in a Porcine Model" (2020) published in World Neurosurgery

Frequent co-authors in Gillies's work include Matthew A. Howard, Saul Wilson, Royce W. Woodroffe, Sean J. Nagel, and Marshall T. Holland.

Gillies has published notably in the following venues:

  • Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface
  • World Neurosurgery
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Modern Optics
  • Pain Medicine

The scientist has been recognized with several awards including:

  • Fellow, National Academy of Inventors (2018)
  • Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) (2007) with a citation highlighting contributions to magnetic stereotaxis and advances in medical catheter guidance and drug delivery research
  • Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) (2004)

Best Publications

  • Remote thermometry with thermographic phosphors: Instrumentation and applications

    S. W. Allison;G. T. Gillies

  • The mass of the photon

    Liang-Cheng Tu;Jun Luo;George T Gillies

  • A realistic brain tissue phantom for intraparenchymal infusion studies

    Zhi Jian Chen;George T. Gillies;William C. Broaddus;Sujit S. Prabhu

  • The Newtonian gravitational constant: recent measurements and related studies

    George T Gillies

  • Multi-probe system

    John Kucharczyk;George T. Gillies

  • Static magnetic fields for treatment of fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial.

    Alan P. Alfano;Ann Gill Taylor;Pamela A. Foresman;Philomena R. Dunkl

  • Catheter navigation within an MR imaging device

    George T. Gillies;Roger N. Hastings;Jeffrey M. Garibaldi;William C. Broaddus

  • MAGNETIC MANIPULATION INSTRUMENTATION FOR MEDICAL PHYSICS RESEARCH

    G. T. Gillies;R. C. Ritter;W. C. Broaddus;M. S. Grady

  • Magnetic stereotactic system for treatment delivery

    Matthew A. Howard;Marc Mayberg;M. Sean Grady;Rogers C. Ritter

  • Pulsed laser damage to optical fibers.

    S. W. Allison;G. T. Gillies;D. W. Magnuson;T. S. Pagano

  • Torsion balances, torsion pendulums, and related devices

    G. T. Gillies;R. C. Ritter

  • Nonlinear magnetic stereotaxis: three-dimensional, in vivo remote magnetic manipulation of a small object in canine brain.

    M. S. Grady;M. A. Howard;J. A. Molloy;R. C. Ritter

  • Intraparenchymal drug delivery via positive-pressure infusion: experimental and modeling studies of poroelasticity in brain phantom gels

    Zhi-Jian Chen;W.C. Broaddus;R.R. Viswanathan;R. Raghavan

  • Access needle pressure sensor device and method of use

    Srijoy Mahapatra;George T. Gillies

  • In vitro angiogenesis by human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) induced by three-dimensional co-culture with glioblastoma cells

    Zhijian Chen;Andre Htay;Wagner Dos Santos;George T. Gillies;George T. Gillies

  • Utilization of type I collagen gel, demineralized bone matrix, and bone morphogenetic protein-2 to enhance autologous bone lumbar spinal fusion

    Gregory A. Helm;Jonas M. Sheehan;Jason P. Sheehan;John A. Jane

  • Nanoscale thermometry via the fluorescence of YAG:Ce phosphor particles: measurements from 7 to 77°C

    S W Allison;G T Gillies;G T Gillies;A J Rondinone;M R Cates

  • Mri and magnetic stereotaxis surgical system

    John Kucharczyk;George T. Gillies

  • Steerable epicardial pacing catheter system placed via the subxiphoid process

    Srijoy Mahapatra;George T. Gillies

  • Functional design features and initial performance characteristics of a magnetic-implant guidance system for stereotactic neurosurgery

    R.G. McNeil;R.C. Ritter;B. Wang;M.A. Lawson

  • Characteristics of an improved magnetic-implant guidance system

    R.G. McNeil;R.C. Ritter;B. Wang;M.A. Lawson

  • Distribution of macromolecular dyes in brain using positive pressure infusion: a model for direct controlled delivery of therapeutic agents

    Sujit S. Prabhu;William C. Broaddus;George T. Gillies;George T. Gillies;William G. Loudon

  • The Newtonian Gravitational Constant: An index of measurements

    George T Gillies

  • Non-Newtonian Gravity and New Weak Forces: an Index of Measurements and Theory

    E Fischbach;G T Gillies;D E Krause;J G Schwan

  • Magnetic guidance of ferrofluidic nanoparticles in an in vitro model of intraocular retinal repair

    D L Holligan;G T Gillies;G T Gillies;J P Dailey

  • Measurement of the force required to move a neurosurgical probe through in vivo human brain tissue

    M.A. Howard;B.A. Abkes;M.C. Ollendieck;M.D. Noh

  • Neurosurgical delivery of chemotherapeutics, targeted toxins, genetic and viral therapies in neuro-oncology.

    E. Antonio Chiocca;William C. Broaddus;George T. Gillies;Therese Visted

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew A. Howard
Matthew A. Howard University of Iowa
Rogers C. Ritter
Rogers C. Ritter Pulse Therapeutics
Andre G. Machado
Andre G. Machado Cleveland Clinic
Lynn A. Boatner
Lynn A. Boatner Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Matthew R. Begley
Matthew R. Begley University of California, Santa Barbara
Daryl R. Kipke
Daryl R. Kipke University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David J. Anderson
David J. Anderson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John A. Jane
John A. Jane University of Virginia Health System
Alexandra J. Golby
Alexandra J. Golby Brigham and Women's Hospital
Salvatore Torquato
Salvatore Torquato Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and technology students in the USA often benefit from branching into complementary fields to expand their career opportunities. Online education makes it easy to add credentials and diversify your skill set alongside core engineering studies.

For those interested in financial management roles or seeking foundational business skills, earning a bookkeeping certification can open doors in both startups and large organizations. Similarly, a degree in office administration is ideal for students aiming for careers that require expertise in organizational processes and office management.

If you’re looking at leadership or management positions, consider pursuing business administration courses online. These programs develop decision-making, communication, and analytical abilities essential in engineering and tech-driven businesses. For those ready to advance further, the best organizational leadership master's programs can help professionals excel in strategic leadership roles across multiple industries.

Integrating skills from these fields with your engineering or technology background can enhance employability and provide flexibility in an evolving job landscape.

Best Scientists Citing George T. Gillies

Trending Scientists