World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
30
Citations
5064
World Ranking
7664
National Ranking
3737

Gene A. Shelley publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gene A. Shelley sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 50 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Gene A. Shelley D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gene A. Shelley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Intimate partner violence surveillance : uniform definitions and recommended data elements. Version 1.0

    Linda E. Saltzman;Janet L. Fanslow;Pamela M. McMahon;Gene A. Shelley

  • Comparing Two Methods for Estimating Network Size

    Christopher McCarty;Peter D. Killworth;H. Russell Bernard;Eugene C. Johnsen

  • COMPARING FOUR DIFFERENT METHODS FOR MEASURING PERSONAL SOCIAL NETWORKS

    H.Russell Bernard;Eugene C. Johnsen;Peter D. Killworth;Christopher McCarty

  • Estimating the size of personal networks

    Peter D. Killworth;Eugene C. Johnsen;H.Russell Bernard;Gene Ann Shelley

  • Eliciting representative samples of personal networks

    C. McCarty;H.R. Bernard;P.D. Killworth;G.A. Shelley

  • Estimation of Seroprevalence, Rape, and Homelessness in the United States Using a Social Network Approach

    Peter D. Killworth;Christopher McCarty;H. Russell Bernard;Gene Ann Shelley

  • Attitudinal acceptance of intimate partner violence among U.S. adults.

    Thomas R. Simon;Michael Anderson;Martie P. Thompson;Alexander E. Crosby

  • Counting hard-to-count populations: the network scale-up method for public health.

    H Russell Bernard;Tim Hallett;Alexandrina Iovita;Eugene C Johnsen

  • Impact of a school-based dating violence prevention program among Latino teens: randomized controlled effectiveness trial.

    Lisa H. Jaycox;Daniel McCaffrey;Beth Eiseman;Jessica Aronoff

  • A social network approach to estimating seroprevalence in the United States

    Peter D. Killworth;Eugene C. Johnsen;Christopher McCarty;Gene Ann Shelley

  • Child Maltreatment Prevention Priorities at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Daniel J. Whitaker;John R. Lutzker;Gene A. Shelley

  • Who knows your HIV status? What HIV + patients and their network members know about each other

    Gene A. Shelley;H.Russell Bernard;Peter Killworth;Eugene Johnsen

  • Latino Teens Talk About Help Seeking and Help Giving in Relation to Dating Violence

    Beverly Weidmer Ocampo;Gene A. Shelley;Lisa H. Jaycox

  • Two interpretations of reports of knowledge of subpopulation sizes

    Peter D. Killworth;Christopher McCarty;H.Russell Bernard;Eugene C. Johnsen

  • Survivors' Identification of Protective Factors and Early Warning Signs for Intimate Partner Violence

    Unknown

  • Challenges in the Evaluation and Implementation of School-Based Prevention and Intervention Programs on Sensitive Topics

    Lisa H. Jaycox;Daniel F. McCaffrey;Beverly Weidmer Ocampo;Gene A. Shelley

  • How much of a network does the GSS and RSW dredge up

    H.Russell Bernard;Gene Ann Shelley;Peter Killworth

  • Telephone survey respondents' reactions to questions regarding interpersonal violence.

    Michele C. Black;Marcie-jo Kresnow;Thomas R. Simon;Ileana Arias

  • Characteristics of the Safe at Home instrument for assessing readiness to change intimate partner violence.

    Audrey L. Begun;Christopher Murphy;Daniel Bolt;Benjamin Weinstein

  • Investigating the Variation of Personal Network Size Under Unknown Error Conditions

    Peter D. Killworth;Christopher McCarty;Eugene C. Johnsen;H. Russell Bernard

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher McCarty
Christopher McCarty University of Florida
H. Russell Bernard
H. Russell Bernard Arizona State University
Peter D. Killworth
Peter D. Killworth University of Cambridge
Timothy B. Hallett
Timothy B. Hallett Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Gene A. Shelley

Recently Published Articles