World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
6651
World Ranking
7318
National Ranking
3954

Gary R. Lee publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary R. Lee sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 79 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gary R. Lee D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary R. Lee sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gary R. Lee is affiliated with Bowling Green State University in the United States. Their academic work and research activities are tied to this institution.

There are no recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues listed for Gary R. Lee, which limits detailed insight into their most current research contributions or collaborative networks.

No main or subfields of study are provided, nor are there specific main topics of work mentioned. This means that a precise description of their focus areas within academia cannot be established from the available information.

Similarly, no book publications or awards have been documented, so there is no record of contributions to academic literature or recognitions within their professional career visible in this dataset.

Gary R. Lee is currently living, and the profile is composed using present tense to reflect ongoing affiliation and potential ongoing academic activities.

Best Publications

  • Marital Status and Personal Happiness: An Analysis of Trend Data.

    Gary R. Lee;Karen Seccombe;Constance L. Shehan

  • Social Interaction, Loneliness, and Emotional Well-Being among the Elderly:

    Gary R. Lee;Masako Ishii-Kuntz

  • Gender Differences in the Depressive Effect of Widowhood in Later Life

    Gary R. Lee;Alfred DeMaris;Stefoni Bavin;Rachel Sullivan

  • Filial Responsibility Expectations and Patterns of Intergenerational Assistance

    Gary R. Lee;Julie K. Netzer;Raymond T. Coward

  • Union Formation and Depression: Selection and Relationship Effects

    Kathleen A. Lamb;Gary R. Lee;Alfred DeMaris

  • Gender Differences in Parent Care: Demographic Factors and Same-Gender Preferences

    Gary R. Lee;Jeffrey W. Dwyer;Raymond T. Coward

  • The Significance of Nonmarital Cohabitation: Marital Status and Mental Health Benefits Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults

    Susan L Brown;Jennifer Roebuck Bulanda;Gary R Lee

  • Cohabitation Among Older Adults: A National Portrait

    Susan L. Brown;Gary R. Lee;Jennifer Roebuck Bulanda

  • Depression among Older Parents: The Role of Intergenerational Exchange.

    Gary R. Lee;Julie K. Netzer;Raymond T. Coward

  • Social relations and the self-esteem of older persons.

    Gary R. Lee;Constance L. Shehan

  • Reciprocity, elder satisfaction, and caregiver stress and burden: the exchange of aid in the family caregiving relationship

    Jeffrey W. Dwyer;Gary R. Lee;Thomas B. Jankowski

  • Widowhood, Gender, and Depression: A Longitudinal Analysis

    Gary R. Lee;Alfred A. Demaris

  • Race differences in filial responsibility expectations among older parents.

    Gary R. Lee;Chuck W. Peek;Raymond T. Coward

  • Intergenerational Exchange and Subjective Well-being among the Elderly.

    Gary R. Lee;Eugene Ellithorpe

  • Kinship and Social Support of the Elderly: The Case of the United States

    Gary R. Lee

  • Transitions Into and Out of Cohabitation in Later Life

    Susan L. Brown;Jennifer Roebuck Bulanda;Gary R. Lee

  • Widowhood and Depression Gender Differences

    Gary R. Lee;Marion C. Willetts;Karen Seccombe

  • Family structure and interaction: A comparative analysis

    Gary R. Lee

  • Kinship in the seventies: A decade review of research and theory.

    Gary R. Lee

  • Retirement and Marital Satisfaction

    Gary R. Lee;Constance L. Shehan

Frequent Co-Authors

Raymond T. Coward
Raymond T. Coward University of Vermont
Alfred DeMaris
Alfred DeMaris Bowling Green State University
Susan L. Brown
Susan L. Brown Bowling Green State University
Paul R. Amato
Paul R. Amato Pennsylvania State University
Glenna Spitze
Glenna Spitze University at Albany, State University of New York
Cheryl Buehler
Cheryl Buehler University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Lynn K. White
Lynn K. White University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Alan Booth
Alan Booth Pennsylvania State University
Les B. Whitbeck
Les B. Whitbeck University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Linda J. Waite
Linda J. Waite University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens up a variety of online degree options and exciting career pathways. Many students are now opting for online education to enhance flexibility and accessibility while earning essential qualifications.

A popular career path for Psychology graduates is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). Certification requirements can vary by state and even by city. For example, those interested in counseling roles should be aware of the Plano mft certification requirements. If you are considering a move or starting your career in Florida, learning how to become an mft in Port St. Lucie is essential.

Similarly, aspiring professionals in the Pacific Northwest should review the Portland mft certification requirements. In North Carolina, there are unique pathways, so understanding the Raleigh mft certification requirements will be beneficial.

No matter your location, researching regional requirements and available online programs will help you chart a clear, successful pathway in the psychology and mental health field.

Best Scientists Citing Gary R. Lee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles