World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 42 1853 1715 66 63 192 6010

G. B. Schaffer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by G. B. Schaffer between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. G. B. Schaffer published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2010. 4 of the 198 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2010. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 8 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 4 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1980 2025

198 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
G. B. Schaffer: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 0
1989 5
1990 2
1991 1
1992 4
1993 2
1994 1
1995 3
1996 7
1997 2
1998 1
1999 8
2000 5
2001 8
2002 10
2003 11
2004 6
2005 5
2006 7
2007 7
2008 5
2009 16
2010 18
2011 14
2012 14
2013 16
2014 3
2015 1
2016 0
2017 0
2018 2
2019 1
2020 1
2021 1
2022 4
2023 0
2024 1
2025 3
Total 198
Download as CSV

G. B. Schaffer publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. B. Schaffer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 187–196 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 192 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140 192
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

G. B. Schaffer D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. B. Schaffer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107 42
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

G. B. Schaffer is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia and has contributed extensively to research in engineering and materials science. Their scholarly work spans a variety of subfields within these domains, focusing particularly on mechanical engineering, materials chemistry, mechanics of materials, aerospace engineering, and communication.

The research topics explored by Schaffer include:

  • Microstructure and mechanical properties
  • Metallurgy and material forming
  • Titanium alloys microstructure and properties
  • High-temperature coating behaviors
  • Injection molding process and properties
  • Additive manufacturing materials and processes
  • Knowledge management and sharing

Among the recent publications authored or co-authored by Schaffer are:

  • "Predicting the complete tensile properties of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V by integrating three-dimensional microstructure statistics with a crystal plasticity model," published in 2021 in the International Journal of Plasticity
  • "A Comparison of Statistically Equivalent and Realistic Microstructural Representative Volume Elements for Crystal Plasticity Models," published in 2022 in Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation
  • "Invisible Iterations: How Formal and Informal Organization Shape Knowledge Networks for Coordination," published in 2024 in Journal of Management Studies
  • "Critical velocity and deposition efficiency in cold spray: A reduced-order model and experimental validation," forthcoming in 2025 in Journal of Manufacturing Processes
  • "Integrating phase field and crystal plasticity finite element models for simulations of titanium alloy Ti-5553," published in 2021 in Journal of Physics Materials

Frequent collaborators in Schaffer's work include Tesfaye Tadesse Molla, Chris Wallbrink, Zoran Sterjovski, Dylan Agius, and Chunhui Wang.

The scholar's publications have appeared chiefly in the following venues:

  • Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation
  • International Journal of Plasticity
  • Journal of Management Studies
  • Journal of Manufacturing Processes
  • Journal of Physics Materials

Schaffer's research is situated primarily within engineering and materials science, with a strong emphasis on the mechanical properties and microstructural aspects of metals and alloys, especially titanium alloys. The work also integrates computational modeling techniques, such as crystal plasticity finite element models and phase field methods, pointing to a focus on both experimental and simulation-based approaches.

Best Publications

  • Displacement reactions during mechanical alloying

    G. B. Schaffer;P. G. McCormick

  • Liquid phase sintering of aluminium alloys

    G.B Schaffer;T.B Sercombe;R.N Lumley

  • Reduction of metal oxides by mechanical alloying

    G. B. Schaffer;P. G. McCormick

  • On the kinetics of mechanical alloying

    G.B. Schaffer;Paul Mccormick

  • Rapid Manufacturing of Aluminum Components

    T. B. Sercombe;G. B. Schaffer

  • The effect of the atmosphere and the role of pore filling on the sintering of aluminium

    G. B. Schaffer;B. J. Hall;S. J. Bonner;S. H. Huo

  • An age hardening model for Al–7Si–Mg casting alloys

    P.A Rometsch;G.B Schaffer

  • The influence of the atmosphere on the sintering of aluminum

    G. B. Schaffer;B. J. Hall

  • Anomalous combustion effects during mechanical alloying

    G. B. Schaffer;P. G. McCormick

  • The role of iron in the formation of porosity in Al-Si-Cu-based casting alloys: Part I. Initial experimental observations

    J. A. Taylor;G. B. Schaffer;D. H. StJohn

  • Combustion synthesis by mechanical alloying

    G.B. Schaffer;P.G. McCormick

  • Comparison of sintering of titanium and titanium hydride powders

    I. M. Robertson;G. B. Schaffer

  • Review of densification of titanium based powder systems in press and sinter processing

    I. M. Robertson;G. B. Schaffer

  • The effect of solubility and particle size on liquid phase sintering

    R.N. Lumley;G.B. Schaffer

  • The effect of trace elements on the sintering of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu ALLOY

    G.B. Schaffer;S.H. Huo;J. Drennan;G.J. Auchterlonie

  • On the role of magnesium and nitrogen in the infiltration of aluminium by aluminium for rapid prototyping applications

    T.B. Sercombe;G.B. Schaffer

  • The stability of the oxide dispersion in INCONEL alloy MA6000

    G.B. Schaffer;M.H. Loretto;R.E. Smallman;J.W. Brooks

  • The effect of tin and nitrogen on liquid phase sintering of Al-Cu-Mg-Si alloys

    Graham Barry Schaffer;J Y Yao;S J Bonner;E Crossin

  • Infiltrated aluminum preforms

    Graham Barry Schaffer;Timothy Barry Sercombe;Kenneth J. Newell;Kris Alan Schmidt

  • The influence of collision energy and strain accumulation on the kinetics of mechanical alloying

    GB Schaffer;JS Forrester

  • Simultaneous gettering of oxygen and chlorine and homogenization of the β phase by rare earth hydride additions to a powder metallurgy Ti–2.25Mo–1.5Fe alloy

    M. Yan;Y. Liu;Y.B. Liu;C. Kong

  • The role of iron in the formation of porosity in Al-Si-Cu-based casting alloys: Part II. A phase-diagram approach

    J. A. Taylor;G. B. Schaffer;D. H. StJohn

  • The role of iron in the formation of porosity in Al-Si-Cu-based casting alloys: Part III. A microstructural model

    J. A. Taylor;G. B. Schaffer;D. H. StJohn

Frequent Co-Authors

Ma Qian
Ma Qian RMIT University
Timothy B. Sercombe
Timothy B. Sercombe University of Western Australia
Paul Mccormick
Paul Mccormick Columbia University
John Drennan
John Drennan University of Queensland
David H. StJohn
David H. StJohn University of Queensland
Jefferson Zhe Liu
Jefferson Zhe Liu University of Melbourne
Katsuyoshi Kondoh
Katsuyoshi Kondoh Osaka University
Anita J. Hill
Anita J. Hill Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Chun H. Wang
Chun H. Wang University of New South Wales
Yong Liu
Yong Liu Central South University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering can open doors to diverse career pathways. For instance, programs like speech pathology, though seemingly unrelated, highlight key considerations valuable for any online learning journey. Understanding how hard is it to get into speech pathology grad school provides insight into the competitiveness and prerequisites that can apply across graduate programs in technical fields as well.

If you're seeking a more accessible entry point, examining the easiest slp masters programs to get into can offer guidance on selecting programs with flexible admissions criteria. This approach can be beneficial when considering the rigorous standards of engineering disciplines.

Cost is another crucial factor for prospective students. Reviewing details on speech pathology online program cost sheds light on budgeting for tuition and fees, an essential step when comparing different online degree options in engineering and beyond.

Lastly, veterans should explore best military friendly online speech pathology degrees to find programs that support their unique needs. Many engineering programs similarly offer veteran-friendly resources and benefits worth investigating.

Best Scientists Citing G. B. Schaffer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles