World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
30
Citations
5986
World Ranking
3368
National Ranking
1133

F. Freudenstein publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where F. Freudenstein sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 114 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

F. Freudenstein D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where F. Freudenstein sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Kinematic Synthesis of Linkages

    R. S. Hartenburg;J. Denavit;F. Freudenstein

  • Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Systems With Clearances—Part 1: Formation of Dynamic Model

    S. Dubowsky;F. Freudenstein

  • Application of Dual-Number Quaternion Algebra to the Analysis of Spatial Mechanisms

    A. T. Yang;F. Freudenstein

  • Synthesis of kinematic structure of geared kinematic chains and other mechanisms

    F. Buchsbaum;F. Freudenstein

  • Some Applications of Graph Theory to the Structural Analysis of Mechanisms

    L. Dobrjanskyj;F. Freudenstein

  • An Application of Boolean Algebra to the Motion of Epicyclic Drives

    F. Freudenstein

  • The Mechanical Efficiency of Epicyclic Gear Trains

    E. Pennestrì;F. Freudenstein

  • The Creation of Mechanisms According to Kinematic Structure and Function

    Unknown

  • Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Systems With Clearances—Part 2: Dynamic Response

    S. Dubowsky;F. Freudenstein

  • Kinematics and statics of a coupled epicyclic spur-gear train

    F. Freudenstein;A.T. Yang

  • Development of an Optimum Variable-Stroke Internal-Combustion Engine Mechanism From the Viewpoint of Kinematic Structure

    F. Freudenstein;E. R. Maki

  • Application of Line geometry to theoretical kinematics and the kinematic analysis of mechanical systems

    L. Woo;F. Freudenstein

  • On the Analysis and Synthesis of the Workspace of a Three-Link, Turning-Pair Connected Robot Arm

    F. Freudenstein;E. J. F. Primrose

  • The basic concepts of Polya's theory of enumeration, with application to the structural classification of mechanisms

    F. Freudenstein

  • A Systematic Approach to Power-Flow and Static-Force Analysis in Epicyclic Spur-Gear Trains

    E. Pennestrì;F. Freudenstein

  • Kinematic Analysis of Spatial Mechanisms by Means of Screw Coordinates. Part 2—Analysis of Spatial Mechanisms

    M. S. C. Yuan;F. Freudenstein;L. S. Woo

  • An Experimental and Analytical Investigation of the Dynamic Response of a High-Speed Cam-Follower System. Part 2: A Combined, Lumped/Distributed Parameter Dynamic Model

    A. P. Pisano;F. Freudenstein

  • An Experimental and Analytical Investigation of the Dynamic Response of a High-Speed Cam-Follower System. Part 1: Experimental Investigation

    A. P. Pisano;F. Freudenstein

  • Kinematic Structure of Mechanisms for Fixed and Variable-Stroke Axial-Piston Reciprocating Machines

    F. Freudenstein;E. R. Maki

  • Theoretical kinematics: by O. Bottema and B. Roth. Series in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 24, 558 pp. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens doors to a variety of related fields, many of which offer online learning options. Exploring different therapy degrees, for example, can be beneficial for engineers interested in human factors or ergonomic design, integrating engineering with psychological principles.

When considering online education, some students look for the easiest degree in counseling to complement their technical skills with communication or leadership training. This can enhance teamwork and management abilities in engineering environments.

For professionals seeking to fast-track their education, options like the fast track ABA masters online illustrate how accelerated programs can help advance expertise efficiently. Although not directly related to engineering, such programs demonstrate the increasing flexibility in online degree pathways.

Lastly, understanding program competitiveness is important. Just as understanding the SLP acceptance rate aids prospective students in speech-language pathology, researching acceptance rates in engineering graduate programs can guide applicants in managing expectations and strengthening applications.

Recently Published Articles