World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Els Goetghebeur

Els Goetghebeur

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
37
Citations
5867
World Ranking
2499
National Ranking
34

Els Goetghebeur publications per year

1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publications 1992: 1 publications 1993: 1 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications 2026: 1 publications
1990 2026

229 publications in total across all disciplines

Els Goetghebeur publication distribution in Mathematics in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Els Goetghebeur sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 140 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Els Goetghebeur D-index placement in Mathematics in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Els Goetghebeur sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Surveillance or Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Recurrence: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Phase II Trial

    Piet Ost;Dries Reynders;Karel Decaestecker;Valérie Fonteyne

  • Framework for the treatment and reporting of missing data in observational studies: The Treatment And Reporting of Missing data in Observational Studies framework.

    Katherine J Lee;Kate M Tilling;Rosie P Cornish;Roderick J A Little

  • Causal inference with generalized structural mean models

    Stijn Vansteelandt;Els Goetghebeur

  • Ignorance and uncertainty regions as inferential tools in a sensitivity analysis

    Stijn Vansteelandt;Els Goetghebeur;Michael G. Kenward;Geert Molenberghs

  • Comparing compliance patterns between randomized treatments.

    Bernard Vrijens;Els Goetghebeur

  • Sensitivity analysis for incomplete contingency tables: the Slovenian plebiscite case

    Geert Molenberghs;Michael G. Kenward;Els J.T. Goetghebeur

  • Analysis of competing risks survival data when some failure types are missing

    Els Goetghebeur;Louise Ryan

  • Surveillance or metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence (STOMP): Five-year results of a randomized phase II trial.

    Piet Ost;Dries Reynders;Karel Decaestecker;Valerie Fonteyne

  • Semiparametric regression analysis of interval-censored data.

    Els Goetghebeur;Louise Ryan

  • Estimation of controlled direct effects

    Sylvie Goetgeluk;Stijn Vansteelandt;Els Goetghebeur

  • On Instrumental Variables Estimation of Causal Odds Ratios

    Stijn Vansteelandt;Jack Bowden;Manoochehr Babanezhad;Els Goetghebeur

  • Low-dose hydroxychloroquine therapy and mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a nationwide observational study of 8075 participants.

    Lucy Catteau;Nicolas Dauby;Marion Montourcy;Emmanuel Bottieau

  • A Causal Proportional Hazards Estimator for the Effect of Treatment Actually Received in a Randomized Trial with All-or-Nothing Compliance

    Tom Loeys;Els Goetghebeur

  • Regression models for disease prevalence with diagnostic tests on pools of serum samples.

    Stijn Vansteelandt;Els Goetghebeur;T Verstraeten

  • Randomized Phase 1 Trial of Pembrolizumab with Sequential Versus Concomitant Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

    Nora Sundahl;Gillian Vandekerkhove;Karel Decaestecker;Annabel Meireson

  • Model evaluation based on the sampling distribution of estimated absolute prediction error

    Lu Tian;Tianxi Cai;Els Goetghebeur;L. J. Wei

  • Locating fire stations: An integrated approach for Belgium

    Philippe Chevalier;Isabelle Thomas;David Geraets;Els Goetghebeur

  • Diagnostic test analyses in search of their gold standard: latent class analyses with random effects

    Els Goetghebeur;Jan Liinev;Marleen Boelaert;Patrick Van der Stuyft

  • Sensitivity analysis for incomplete categorical data

    Michael G. Kenward;Els J.T. Goetghebeur;Geert Molenberghs

  • Nonrandom missingness in categorical data: strengths and limitations

    Geert Molenberghs;Els J. T. Goetghebeur;Stuart R. Lipsitz;Michael G. Kenward

Frequent Co-Authors

Stijn Vansteelandt
Stijn Vansteelandt Ghent University
Michael G. Kenward
Michael G. Kenward London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Alexander W. Wyatt
Alexander W. Wyatt University of British Columbia
Herman Van Oyen
Herman Van Oyen Ghent University
Marleen Boelaert
Marleen Boelaert Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
James R. Carpenter
James R. Carpenter University College London
Marc Peeters
Marc Peeters University of Antwerp
Shabbar Jaffar
Shabbar Jaffar University College London
Isabel Roldán-Ruiz
Isabel Roldán-Ruiz Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their academic and career horizons beyond Mathematics, exploring online degrees can be a smart move. Many students consider flexible programs like the easiest mba program options to balance work and study without overwhelming pressure. These programs prioritize accessibility and adaptability, making them a popular choice.

If you’re looking specifically for fully remote options, the easiest online mba programs to get into offer a range of curricula designed to fit diverse schedules and career goals. They often focus on practical skills that complement a Mathematics background, such as finance, management, and data analysis.

For professionals aiming to reach leadership positions in business, affordable paths like the cheapest online dba programs provide doctoral-level expertise without a hefty price tag. These programs emphasize research, strategy, and advanced business concepts tailored for working adults.

Additionally, those interested in financial sectors may consider budget-friendly options such as the cheap masters in finance. This degree can complement mathematical skills with financial theory and quantitative techniques, opening doors to careers in investment, banking, and analytics.

Best Scientists Citing Els Goetghebeur

Recently Published Articles