World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
32
Citations
7001
World Ranking
3121
National Ranking
1250

Ed Dubinsky publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ed Dubinsky sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 116 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Ed Dubinsky D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ed Dubinsky sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ed Dubinsky was affiliated with Kent State University in the United States throughout their academic career. Their work spanned numerous aspects of their field, contributing to the university's scholarly community.

Although specific papers or frequent co-authors are not listed, their academic presence at Kent State University points to engagement with ongoing research and collaboration within the institution.

There is no detailed record of their frequent publication venues, book publications, or explicit fields and subfields of study available in the data provided.

Similarly, no main topics or thematic focuses of their research work have been identified in the accessible data.

The absence of awards details or recognitions does not preclude the possibility of scholarly contributions, but no specific honors or distinctions are recorded in the provided information.

Ed Dubinsky is deceased, and all references to their career have been made in past tense in accordance with this information.

Best Publications

  • Reflective Abstraction in Advanced Mathematical Thinking

    Ed Dubinsky

  • Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process scheme

    Jim Cottrill;Ed Dubinsky;Devilyna Nichols;Keith Schwingendorf

  • Development of the Process Conception of Function

    Daniel Breidenbach;Ed Dubinsky;Julie Hawks;Devilyna Nichols

  • APOS: A Constructivist Theory of Learning in Undergraduate Mathematics Education Research

    Ed Dubinsky;Michael A. Mcdonald

  • A Framework for Research and Curriculum Development in Undergraduate Mathematics Educationjpeg

    Asiala;Anne Brown;David DeViries;Ed Dubinsky

  • On Learning Fundamental Concepts of Group Theory.

    Ed Dubinsky;Jennie Dautermann;Uri Leron;Rina Zazkis

  • The development of students' graphical understanding of the derivative

    Mark Asiala;Jim Cottrill;Ed Dubinsky;Keith E. Schwingendorf

  • Coordinating Visual and Analytic Strategies: A Study of Students' Understanding of the Group D4.

    Rina Zazkis;Ed Dubinsky;Jennie Dautermann

  • Some Historical Issues and Paradoxes Regarding the Concept of Infinity: An APOS-Based Analysis--Part 1.

    Ed Dubinsky;Kirk Weller;Michael A. Mcdonald;Anne Brown

  • An Abstract Algebra Story.

    Uri Leron;Uri Leron;Ed Dubinsky;Ed Dubinsky

  • High School Students' Understanding of the Function Concept.

    Ed Dubinsky;Robin T. Wilson

  • The Structure of Nuclear Frechet Spaces

    Ed Dubinsky

  • Development of students' understanding of cosets, normality, and quotient groups

    Mark Asiala;Ed Dubinsky;David M. Mathews;Steven Morics

  • Computer Experiences in Learning Composition of Functions.

    Thomas Ayers;George Davis;Ed Dubinsky;Philip Lewin

  • Teaching Mathematical Induction I.

    Ed Dubinsky

  • Constructive Aspects of Reflective Abstraction in Advanced Mathematics

    Ed Dubinsky

  • Reflective abstraction in computational thinking

    Ibrahim Cetin;Ed Dubinsky

  • Learning abstract algebra with ISETL

    Ed Dubinsky;Uri Leron

  • Fréchet spaces with nuclear Köthe quotients

    Steven F. Bellenot;Ed Dubinsky

  • Learning binary operations, groups, and subgroups

    Anne Brown;Anne Brown;David J. DeVries;David J. DeVries;Ed Dubinsky;Ed Dubinsky;Karen Thomas

  • Preservice Teachers' Understanding of the Relation Between a Fraction or Integer and Its Decimal Expansion

    Kirk Weller;Ilana Arnon;Ed Dubinsky

  • Advanced Mathematical Thinking.

    Barbara S. Edwards;Ed Dubinsky;Michael A. McDonald

  • Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education. III

    Unknown

  • Mathematical Structures for Computer Science.

    Edward Dubinsky;Judith L. Gersting

Frequent Co-Authors

Jacob T. Schwartz
Jacob T. Schwartz Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Alan H. Schoenfeld
Alan H. Schoenfeld University of California, Berkeley
David Tall
David Tall University of Warwick
Marian Petre
Marian Petre The Open University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, expanding academic horizons through related online degrees can offer valuable flexibility and career growth. Many professionals consider enrolling in an easiest online MBA programs to get into to complement their quantitative skills with business acumen. These programs provide practical leadership training while accommodating busy schedules.

Additionally, advanced degrees such as DBA programs online are an excellent option for those looking to deepen expertise in data analysis and decision-making at the doctoral level. These programs focus heavily on business research methodologies, often overlapping with mathematical modeling content.

Finance-focused pathways also attract math graduates seeking to enhance their marketability. Pursuing one of the cheapest online masters in finance can provide specialized knowledge in investment strategies and risk assessment, which rely on strong quantitative foundations.

For those eager to advance quickly, the quickest online MBA options allow students to gain credentials in a shorter timeframe, accelerating entry into management roles. Exploring these related online degrees can open diverse career pathways while leveraging a background in mathematics.

Best Scientists Citing Ed Dubinsky