World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
56
Citations
9317
World Ranking
4581
National Ranking
2067

Donald S. Faber publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald S. Faber sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 124 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Donald S. Faber D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald S. Faber sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Donald S. Faber is affiliated with Albert Einstein College of Medicine in the United States. Their research spans several fields, primarily focusing on biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, neuroscience, and environmental science.

The main topics in Faber's research include:

  • Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Physiological and biochemical adaptations

Their main research fields are supported by work in several subfields such as cell biology, ecology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, and molecular biology.

Faber has coauthored multiple scientific papers with frequent collaborators including Steven J. Zottoli, Joseph R. Fetcho, John R. Hering, Ann C. Dannhauer, and Susan Northen.

Their recent publications include:

  • Survival and Axonal Outgrowth of the Mauthner Cell Following Spinal Cord Crush Does Not Drive Post-injury Startle Responses, 2021, published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
  • Multiple Neuronal Processes, Including the Mauthner Axon, Form a Multi-Axial Fiber Within a Common Myelin Sheath in the Central Nervous System of Adult Lungfishes, Protopterus annectens, Lepidosiren paradoxa, and Neoceratodus forsteri, 2025, published in Journal of Morphology

These papers reflect a focus on cellular neuroscience and morphological studies relevant to nervous system structure and function across species.

Faber's works have appeared frequently in the following publication venues:

  • Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
  • Journal of Morphology

Among honors received, Faber was elected a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1999.

Best Publications

  • The Mauthner cell half a century later: a neurobiological model for decision-making?

    Henri Korn;Donald S. Faber

  • Quantal analysis and synaptic efficacy in the CNS

    Henri Korn;Donald S. Faber

  • Axotomy-induced alterations in the electrophysiological characteristics of neurons

    Margaret J. Titmus;Donald S. Faber

  • Neurobiology of the Mauthner cell

    Donald S. Faber;Henri Korn

  • Transmission at a central inhibitory synapse. II. Quantal description of release, with a physical correlate for binomial n.

    H Korn;A Mallet;A Triller;D S Faber

  • Long-term potentiation of electrotonic coupling at mixed synapses

    Xian-Da Yang;Henri Korn;Donald S. Faber

  • Neuronal networks underlying the escape response in goldfish. General implications for motor control.

    Donald S. Faber;Joseph R. Fetcho;Henri Korn

  • Intrinsic quantal variability due to stochastic properties of receptor-transmitter interactions.

    Donald S. Faber;William S. Young;Pascal Legendre;Henri Korn

  • Fluctuating Responses at a Central Synapse: n of Binomial Fit Predicts Number of Stained Presynaptic Boutons

    Henri Korn;Antoine Triller;Alain Mallet;Donald S. Faber

  • Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II mediates simultaneous enhancement of gap-junctional conductance and glutamatergic transmission

    Alberto E. Pereda;Theodore D. Bell;Bill H. Chang;Andrew J. Czernik

  • Neural representation of object approach in a decision-making motor circuit.

    Thomas Preuss;Princess E. Osei-Bonsu;Shennan A. Weiss;C. Wang

  • Identification of motoneurons and interneurons in the spinal network for escapes initiated by the mauthner cell in goldfish.

    JR Fetcho;DS Faber

  • Synaptic transmission mediated by single club endings on the goldfish Mauthner cell. I. Characteristics of electrotonic and chemical postsynaptic potentials

    Jen-Wei Lin;D. S. Faber

  • Activity-dependent short-term enhancement of intercellular coupling

    Alberto E. Pereda;Donald S. Faber

  • Strychnine- and Pentylenetetrazol-Induced Changes of Excitability in Aplysia Neurons

    Manfred R. Klee;Donald S. Faber;Wolf-Dieter Heiss

  • Properties and plasticity of paired-pulse depression at a central synapse.

    Robert F. Waldeck;Alberto Pereda;Donald S. Faber

  • Localization of optic tectal input to the ventral dendrite of the goldfish Mauthner cell

    Steven J. Zottoli;Andrew R. Hordes;Donald S. Faber

  • Long-term potentiation of inhibitory circuits and synapses in the central nervous system

    Henri Korn;Yoichi Oda;Donald S. Faber

  • Automatic detection of spontaneous synaptic responses in central neurons.

    N. Ankri;P. Legendre;D.S. Faber;H. Korn

  • Dopamine enhances both electrotonic coupling and chemical excitatory postsynaptic potentials at mixed synapses.

    Alberto Pereda;Antoine Triller;Henri Korn;Donald S. Faber;Donald S. Faber

Frequent Co-Authors

Henri Korn
Henri Korn Institut Pasteur
John C. Eccles
John C. Eccles Australian National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA opens up a variety of interdisciplinary career options. Many students find that closely related fields—such as social work, behavior analysis, and psychology—offer valuable skills and rewarding pathways.

For those interested in mental health or community counseling, pursuing an online msw can lead to roles in clinical social work or policy advocacy. Social work programs are increasingly flexible, with a range of msw programs available for students seeking accelerated or traditional formats.

If you are drawn to behavior analysis, consider qualifying for bcba certification online. This credential is crucial for careers in applied behavior analysis and is often required by employers in educational, private, and clinical settings.

Students wanting to combine neuroscience with psychology will also benefit from an accelerated psychology degree. This option allows learners to gain a foundation in psychological principles on a flexible schedule, ideal for busy professionals or those seeking fast-tracked career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Donald S. Faber

Trending Scientists