World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
78
Citations
35960
World Ranking
1728
National Ranking
42

John C. Eccles publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Eccles sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 254 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John C. Eccles D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Eccles sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

John C. Eccles was affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia. Their academic contributions include publications in book format, with a focus on musical works.

Eccles authored at least two books published by A-R Editions eBooks. These books are titled Incidental Music, Part 2 (2021) and Incidental Music, Part 3 (2023). Both books were released by the same publisher, contributing to the corpus of incidental music literature.

The scientist did not have recorded frequent co-authors or recurring publication venues listed. Similarly, there are no specified main fields, subfields, or main topics of study detailed for their research output. The absence of listed research papers suggests a focus primarily on book publications within their documented academic activity.

John C. Eccles is noted as deceased. No awards or recognitions are documented in the available data.

Best Publications

  • The self and its brain

    Karl R. Popper;John C. Eccles

  • The cerebellum as a neuronal machine

    John C. Eccles;Masao Ito;János Szentágothai

  • The emotional brain.

    Unknown

  • Interactions between motoneurones and muscles in respect of the characteristic speeds of their responses.

    A. J. Buller;J. C. Eccles;Rosamond M. Eccles

  • The convergence of monosynaptic excitatory afferents on to many different species of alpha motoneurones

    J. C. Eccles;Rosamond M. Eccles;A. Lundberg

  • Reflex Activity of the Spinal Cord.

    R. S. Creed;D. Denny-brown;J. C. Eccles;E. G. T. Liddell

  • Brain and Conscious Experience

    John C. Eccles

  • The Neurophysiological Basis of Mind

    John Eccles

  • The action potentials of the alpha motoneurones supplying fast and slow muscles

    J. C. Eccles;Rosamond M. Eccles;A. Lundberg

  • Synaptic actions on motoneurones caused by impulses in Golgi tendon organ afferents.

    J. C. Eccles;Rosamond M. Eccles;A. Lundberg

  • Central inhibitory action attributable to presynaptic depolarization produced by muscle afferent volleys.

    J. C. Eccles;Rosamond M. Eccles;F. Magni

  • Numbers and Contraction-Values of Individual Motor-Units Examined in some Muscles of the Limb

    John Carew Eccles;Charles Scott Sherrington

  • The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism

    John C. Eccles;Karl Popper

  • The interpretation of spike potentials of motoneurones.

    J. S. Coombs;D. R. Curtis;J. C. Eccles

  • Prolongation of hippocampal inhibitory postsynaptic potentials by barbiturates.

    R. A. Nicoll;R. A. Nicoll;J. C. Eccles;T. Oshima;F. Rubia;F. Rubia

  • Quantum aspects of brain activity and the role of consciousness.

    Friedrich Beck;John C. Eccles

  • The understanding of the brain

    John C. Eccles

  • Inhibitory phasing of neuronal discharge.

    P. Andersen;John Eccles

  • The action of tetanus toxin on the inhibition of motoneurones.

    V. B. Brooks;D. R. Curtis;J. C. Eccles

  • The initiation of voluntary movements by the supplementary motor area.

    John C. Eccles

  • The Self and Its Brain.

    K. T. Maslin;Karl R. Popper;John C. Eccles

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick L. McGeer
Patrick L. McGeer University of British Columbia
Edith G. McGeer
Edith G. McGeer University of British Columbia
Masao Ito
Masao Ito RIKEN Center for Brain Science
Karl R. Popper
Karl R. Popper London School of Economics and Political Science
Rodolfo R. Llinás
Rodolfo R. Llinás New York University
Robert F. Schmidt
Robert F. Schmidt University of Würzburg
Per Andersen
Per Andersen University of Copenhagen
Roger A. Nicoll
Roger A. Nicoll University of California, San Francisco
Piergiorgio Strata
Piergiorgio Strata University of Turin
David R. Curtis
David R. Curtis Australian National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a career in neuroscience, you may also be interested in other online degrees that offer intersecting knowledge and flexible career options. Professionals in neuroscience often work alongside experts in psychology, therapy, and social work, with many graduate programs overlapping in required skills and foundational knowledge.

For those looking to support mental health from a family or relationship perspective, mft masters programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) provide clinical experience and academic training that complements neuroscience studies.

Expanding your expertise with masters programs in psychology or choosing to study psychology online can help you understand behavior and cognition—areas closely related to neuroscience research and practice.

If you are interested in helping communities and individuals through advocacy and support, consider the easiest msw program to start your journey in social work. Each of these pathways can build skills in research, assessment, and intervention, all of which are crucial for a well-rounded neuroscience career.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Eccles

Recently Published Articles