World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
30
Citations
7500
World Ranking
11278
National Ranking
5892

Diane Swick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane Swick sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 58 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Diane Swick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane Swick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition

    Diane Swick;Diane Swick;Victoria Ashley;And U Turken

  • Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks.

    Diane Swick;Victoria Ashley;U. Turken

  • Prefrontal cortex regulates inhibition and excitation in distributed neural networks

    Robert T. Knight;Robert T. Knight;W. Richard Staines;W. Richard Staines;Diane Swick;Linda L. Chao;Linda L. Chao

  • Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: A neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings

    Sharon L. Thompson-Schill;Diane Swick;Martha J. Farah;Mark D’Esposito

  • Dissociation between conflict detection and error monitoring in the human anterior cingulate cortex

    Diane Swick;And U. Turken

  • Effects of frontal lobe damage on interference effects in working memory.

    Sharon L. Thompson-Schill;John Jonides;Christy Marshuetz;Edward E. Smith

  • Time course and specificity of event-related potentials to emotional expressions

    Victoria Ashley;CA Patrik Vuilleumier;CA Patrik Vuilleumier;Diane Swick

  • Response selection in the human anterior cingulate cortex

    And U. Turken;Diane Swick

  • Neural fate of seen and unseen faces in visuospatial neglect: A combined event-related functional MRI and event-related potential study

    Patrik Vuilleumier;Noam Sagiv;Noam Sagiv;Noam Sagiv;Eliot Hazeltine;Russell A Poldrack;Russell A Poldrack

  • Anterior cingulate cortex and the Stroop task: neuropsychological evidence for topographic specificity

    Diane Swick;Jelena Jovanovic;Jelena Jovanovic

  • Effects of Working Memory Load on Visual Selective Attention: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence

    Nikki Pratt;Adrian Willoughby;Diane Swick;Diane Swick

  • Contributions of prefrontal cortex to recognition memory: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence.

    Diane Swick;Robert T. Knight;Robert T. Knight

  • Event-related potentials differentiate the effects of aging on word and nonword repetition in explicit and implicit memory tasks.

    Diane Swick;Robert T. Knight

  • Impaired Response Inhibition in Veterans with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

    Diane Swick;Nikki Honzel;Jary Larsen;Victoria Ashley

  • Source memory retrieval is affected by aging and prefrontal lesions: Behavioral and ERP evidence

    Diane Swick;Ava J. Senkfor;Ava J. Senkfor;Cyma Van Petten

  • Is prefrontal cortex involved in cued recall? A neuropsychological test of PET findings.

    Diane Swick;Robert T. Knight

  • Attentional bias for trauma-related words: exaggerated emotional Stroop effect in Afghanistan and Iraq war veterans with PTSD

    Victoria Ashley;Victoria Ashley;Nikki Honzel;Nikki Honzel;Jary Larsen;Jary Larsen;Timothy Justus;Timothy Justus

  • Are impairments of action monitoring and executive control true dissociative dysfunctions in patients with schizophrenia

    And U. Turken;Patrik Vuilleumier;Daniel H. Mathalon;Diane Swick

  • Locus coeruleus neuronal activity in awake monkeys: relationship to auditory P300-like potentials and spontaneous EEG.

    Diane Swick;J. A. Pineda;S. Schacher;S. L. Foote

  • Effects of systemic clonidine on auditory event-related potentials in squirrel monkeys

    Diane Swick;J. A. Pineda;S. L. Foote;S. L. Foote

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert T. Knight
Robert T. Knight University of California, Berkeley
Stephen L. Foote
Stephen L. Foote University of California, San Diego
Jaime A. Pineda
Jaime A. Pineda University of California, San Diego
Patrik Vuilleumier
Patrik Vuilleumier University of Geneva
Nina F. Dronkers
Nina F. Dronkers University of California, Davis
Russell A. Poldrack
Russell A. Poldrack Stanford University
Rob Knight
Rob Knight University of California, San Diego
Eliot Hazeltine
Eliot Hazeltine University of Iowa
Robert D. Rafal
Robert D. Rafal University of Delaware
Sharon L. Thompson-Schill
Sharon L. Thompson-Schill University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Diane Swick

Recently Published Articles