World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
12718
World Ranking
7410
National Ranking
3231

David Jensen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Jensen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 148 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David Jensen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Jensen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Jensen is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States and specializes in the field of Computer Science with a focus on Artificial Intelligence. Their research portfolio spans several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Physiology.

Their work covers a range of main topics that include:

  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Recent publications authored or coauthored by David Jensen include:

  • "Measuring and characterizing generalization in deep reinforcement learning," 2021, Applied AI Letters
  • "Causal Inference using Gaussian Processes with Structured Latent Confounders," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Beyond Point Masses. II. Non-Keplerian Shape Effects Are Detectable in Several TNO Binaries," 2024, The Astronomical Journal
  • "Improving Causal Inference by Increasing Model Expressiveness," 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "How and Why to Use Experimental Data to Evaluate Methods for Observational Causal Inference," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

David Jensen frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Sam Witty
  • Purva Pruthi
  • Emma Tosch
  • Michael L. Littman
  • Amanda Gentzel

Their published work appears regularly in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Astronomical Journal
  • Applied AI Letters
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Neuroscience Applied

Best Publications

  • MaxProp: Routing for Vehicle-Based Disruption-Tolerant Networks

    J. Burgess;B. Gallagher;D. Jensen;B. N. Levine

  • Resisting structural re-identification in anonymized social networks

    Michael Hay;Gerome Miklau;David Jensen;Don Towsley

  • Efficient progressive sampling

    Foster Provost;David Jensen;Tim Oates

  • Iterative Classification in Relational Data

    Jennifer Neville;David Jensen

  • Anonymizing Social Networks

    Michael Hay;Gerome Miklau;David Jensen;Philipp Weis

  • Accurate Estimation of the Degree Distribution of Private Networks

    Michael Hay;Chao Li;Gerome Miklau;David Jensen

  • Relational Dependency Networks

    Jennifer Neville;David Jensen

  • Why collective inference improves relational classification

    David Jensen;Jennifer Neville;Brian Gallagher

  • Privacy vulnerabilities in encrypted HTTP streams

    George Dean Bissias;Marc Liberatore;David Jensen;Brian Neil Levine

  • Multiple Comparisons in Induction Algorithms

    David D. Jensen;Paul R. Cohen

  • Learning relational probability trees

    Jennifer Neville;David Jensen;Lisa Friedland;Michael Hay

  • Mining of Concurrent Text and Time Series

    Victor Lavrenko;Matt Schmill;Dawn Lawrie;Paul Ogilvie

  • Graph clustering with network structure indices

    Matthew J. Rattigan;Marc Maier;David Jensen

  • The Effects of Training Set Size on Decision Tree Complexity

    Tim Oates;David Jensen

  • Linkage and Autocorrelation Cause Feature Selection Bias in Relational Learning

    David Jensen;Jennifer Neville

  • Recommending citations for academic papers

    Trevor Strohman;W. Bruce Croft;David Jensen

  • Language models for financial news recommendation

    Victor Lavrenko;Matt Schmill;Dawn Lawrie;Paul Ogilvie

  • Detecting insider threats in a real corporate database of computer usage activity

    Ted E. Senator;Henry G. Goldberg;Alex Memory;William T. Young

  • Leveraging relational autocorrelation with latent group models

    Jennifer Neville;David Jensen

  • Collective classification with relational dependency networks

    David Jensen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jennifer Neville
Jennifer Neville Purdue University West Lafayette
Tim Oates
Tim Oates University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Gerome Miklau
Gerome Miklau University of Massachusetts Amherst
Don Towsley
Don Towsley University of Massachusetts Amherst
Paul R. Cohen
Paul R. Cohen University of Pittsburgh
Victor Lesser
Victor Lesser University of Massachusetts Amherst
Brian Neil Levine
Brian Neil Levine University of Massachusetts Amherst
Benyuan Liu
Benyuan Liu University of Massachusetts Lowell
W. Bruce Croft
W. Bruce Croft University of Massachusetts Amherst
James Allan
James Allan University of Massachusetts Amherst

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering Computer Science, there are many flexible and cost-effective online degree options. If you're aiming to accelerate your education, exploring the quickest masters degree online programs can help you quickly gain in-demand skills and fast-track your career advancement.

When choosing a degree, it's important to consider future job prospects and earning potential. Focusing on the most valuable masters degrees ensures your investment pays off with strong employment opportunities and industry relevance.

Not everyone needs a full bachelor's or master's degree—many high-paying positions are open to those with an associate credential. There are also 1 year associate degree programs online that provide a fast, practical route to a technology career, especially for those looking to enter the workforce sooner.

Cost is always a major consideration. Exploring affordable online courses allows you to gain quality education without a hefty price tag, making online learning accessible for many aspiring computer science professionals.

Best Scientists Citing David Jensen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles