World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 34 3037 2754 353 325 156 7791

David de Meza publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David de Meza between 1977 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David de Meza published across 47 years, from 1977 to 2023, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2004. 3 of the 176 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2004. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 3 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication
1977 2023

176 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David de Meza: publications per year, 1977 to 2023
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 3
1979 2
1980 5
1981 3
1982 2
1983 7
1984 3
1985 5
1986 6
1987 6
1988 4
1989 4
1990 3
1991 3
1992 6
1993 1
1994 4
1995 6
1996 3
1997 5
1998 7
1999 2
2000 7
2001 5
2002 4
2003 4
2004 8
2005 0
2006 2
2007 3
2008 1
2009 1
2010 3
2011 1
2012 5
2013 5
2014 6
2015 3
2016 2
2017 4
2018 6
2019 2
2020 3
2021 7
2022 2
2023 1
Total 176
Download as CSV

David de Meza publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David de Meza sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 152–156 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 156 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100 156
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

David de Meza D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David de Meza sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157
33 178
34 171 34
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97
44 115
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

David de Meza is affiliated with the London School of Economics and Political Science in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Economics, Econometrics and Finance, as well as Business, Management and Accounting.

The scientist's work covers a range of subfields, including Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. The main topics addressed in their research reflect this interdisciplinary approach, with notable emphasis on Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing, Housing Market and Economics, Economic Theories and Models, Optimism, Hope, and Well-being, Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction, Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research, and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics.

David de Meza has published in various academic venues. Frequent publication sources include Economics Letters, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Economica, Journal of Public Economics, and Journal of Economic Theory.

Their recent papers include:

  • "Neither an Optimist Nor a Pessimist Be: Mistaken Expectations Lower Well-Being" (2020) in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • "Insuring Replaceable Possessions" (2022) in Economica
  • "Too much trade: The hidden problem of adverse selection" (2021) in Journal of Public Economics
  • "Is the second-cheapest wine a rip-off?" (2021) in Economics Letters
  • "Too much waste, not enough rationing: The failure of stochastic, competitive markets" (2020) in Journal of Economic Theory

De Meza has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, notably:

  • Francesco Reito (3 joint publications)
  • Diane Reyniers (2 joint publications)
  • Christopher Dawson (1 joint publication)
  • Vikram Pathania (1 joint publication)

The research topics indicate a blend of quantitative economic modeling and behavioral insights, focusing on aspects such as market behaviors, pricing strategies, psychological influences on economics, and well-being metrics. This includes analysis of consumer behavior in housing markets and decision-making processes influenced by optimism and psychological factors.

Best Publications

  • Too Much Investment: A Problem of Asymmetric Information

    David de Meza;David C. Webb

  • The Borrower's Curse: Optimism, Finance and Entrepreneurship

    David de Meza;Clive Southey

  • Advantageous Selection in Insurance Markets

    David de Meza;David C. Webb

  • Economic Behaviour and Institutions.

    David de Meza;Thrainn Eggertsson

  • House prices, the supply of collateral and the enterprise economy

    Jane Black;David de Meza;David Jeffreys

  • A strategic motivation for commodity bundling

    David de Meza;J. Carabjo;D. Seidmann

  • Does Asset Ownership Always Motivate Managers? Outside Options and the Property Rights Theory of the Firm

    David de Meza;Ben Lockwood

  • Financial capability: a behavioural economics perspective

    David de Meza;Bernd Irlenbusch;Diane Reyniers

  • And a vision appeared unto them of a great profit: evidence of self-deception among the self-employed

    Gholamreza Arabsheibani;David de Meza;David de Meza;John Maloney;Bernard Pearson

  • The social efficiency of private decisions to enforce property rights

    David de Meza;J. R. Gould

  • Systematic Price Differences Between Successive Auctionsare no Anomaly

    Jane Black;David de Meza

  • Creating a Good Atmosphere: Minimum Participation for Tackling the 'Greenhouse Effect'

    David de Meza;Julia Black;M. Levi

  • Production flexibility as a motive for multinationality

    David de Meza;F. van der Ploeg

  • Wealth, Enterprise and Credit Policy

    David de Meza;David C. Webb

  • Does credit rationing imply insufficient lending

    David de Meza;David de Meza;David C. Webb

  • Overlending?

    Unknown

  • Export subsidies and high productivity: cause or effect?

    David de Meza

  • In praise of inequality: public good provision and income distribution

    Jun-ichi Itaya;David de Meza;Gareth D. Myles

  • INCENTIVE DESIGN UNDER LOSS AVERSION

    David de Meza;David C. Webb

  • Health insurance and the demand for medical care

    David de Meza

  • When are origin and destination regimes equivalent

    Ben Lockwood;David De Meza;Gareth D. Myles

Frequent Co-Authors

Ben Lockwood
Ben Lockwood University of Warwick
Andrew Henley
Andrew Henley Cardiff University
Satoshi Kanazawa
Satoshi Kanazawa London School of Economics and Political Science
Julia Black
Julia Black London School of Economics and Political Science
Nancy L. Segal
Nancy L. Segal California State University, Fullerton
Maurice D. Levi
Maurice D. Levi University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Economics and Finance can open doors to a wide range of advanced online degrees and specialized career pathways. Today, many professionals seek to enhance their expertise with online master’s programs that fit their career ambitions and schedules.

Those interested in managing people and shaping organizational policies may consider a masters in hr online. This degree helps develop critical skills for leading teams and navigating complex workplace dynamics.

If you are driven by data and analytics, pursuing an online data analytics master's degree could help you master advanced statistical analysis and predictive modeling. Similarly, those with an interest in organizational growth and change can explore best organizational development master's programs to build leadership capabilities for dynamic industries.

For students fascinated by financial technology and business performance, a business analytics and intelligence online masters program can provide the skills needed to thrive in data-driven roles. These related online pathways can complement your foundation in Economics and Finance, supporting a rewarding and flexible career.

Best Scientists Citing David de Meza

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles