World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel P. Kennedy

Daniel P. Kennedy

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 35 9090 8396 3832 3470 81 12396

Daniel P. Kennedy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel P. Kennedy between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel P. Kennedy published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2022. 12 of the 112 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2022. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 4 publications
2003 2025

112 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel P. Kennedy: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 1
2007 5
2008 2
2009 2
2010 1
2011 4
2012 2
2013 1
2014 8
2015 9
2016 3
2017 5
2018 3
2019 5
2020 11
2021 9
2022 21
2023 5
2024 8
2025 4
Total 112
Download as CSV

Daniel P. Kennedy publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel P. Kennedy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 81 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406 81
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel P. Kennedy D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel P. Kennedy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296 35
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel P. Kennedy is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience as a subfield. Other subfields they have contributed to include Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Global and Planetary Change, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Autism Spectrum Disorder Research, Neural dynamics and brain function, Mental Health Research Topics, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Climate variability and models, and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies.

Among their frequent coauthors are Lisa Byrge, Richard F. Betzel, Dorit Kliemann, Olaf Sporns, and Jacob Tanner, indicating collaborative engagement in research projects across related domains.

Daniel P. Kennedy has published in various scientific venues, with a notable number of papers appearing in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Human Brain Mapping, Scientific Reports, Molecular Autism, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Key recent publications include:

  • High-amplitude cofluctuations in cortical activity drive functional connectivity (2020), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Nonreplication of functional connectivity differences in autism spectrum disorder across multiple sites and denoising strategies (2020), Human Brain Mapping
  • Trends and Drivers of Terrestrial Sources and Sinks of Carbon Dioxide: An Overview of the TRENDY Project (2024), Global Biogeochemical Cycles
  • Pervasive alterations to snow-dominated ecosystem functions under climate change (2022), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Temporal fluctuations in the brain's modular architecture during movie-watching (2020), NeuroImage

Best Publications

  • The autism brain imaging data exchange: towards a large-scale evaluation of the intrinsic brain architecture in autism

    A Di Martino;C-G Yan;Q Li;E Denio

  • Mapping early brain development in autism.

    Eric Courchesne;Karen Pierce;Cynthia M. Schumann;Elizabeth Redcay

  • The social brain in psychiatric and neurological disorders.

    Daniel P. Kennedy;Ralph Adolphs

  • Failing to deactivate: Resting functional abnormalities in autism

    Daniel P. Kennedy;Elizabeth Redcay;Eric Courchesne

  • Enhancing studies of the connectome in autism using the autism brain imaging data exchange II

    Adriana Di Martino;David O'Connor;David O'Connor;Bosi Chen;Kaat Alaerts

  • The intrinsic functional organization of the brain is altered in autism

    Daniel P. Kennedy;Eric Courchesne;Eric Courchesne

  • Neurotypical Peers are Less Willing to Interact with Those with Autism based on Thin Slice Judgments

    Noah J. Sasson;Daniel J. Faso;Jack Nugent;Sarah Lovell

  • Personal space regulation by the human amygdala

    Daniel P Kennedy;Jan Gläscher;J Michael Tyszka;Ralph Adolphs

  • Atypical Visual Saliency in Autism Spectrum Disorder Quantified through Model-Based Eye Tracking

    Shuo Wang;Ming Jiang;Xavier Morin Duchesne;Elizabeth A. Laugeson

  • The autistic brain: birth through adulthood.

    Eric Courchesne;Elizabeth Redcay;Daniel P Kennedy

  • Functional abnormalities of the default network during self- and other-reflection in autism

    Daniel P. Kennedy;Eric Courchesne

  • Autism at the beginning: microstructural and growth abnormalities underlying the cognitive and behavioral phenotype of autism.

    Eric Courchesne;Elizabeth Redcay;John T. Morgan;Daniel P. Kennedy

  • High-amplitude cofluctuations in cortical activity drive functional connectivity.

    Farnaz Zamani Esfahlani;Youngheun Jo;Joshua Faskowitz;Lisa Byrge

  • Largely Typical Patterns of Resting-State Functional Connectivity in High-Functioning Adults with Autism

    J. Michael Tyszka;Daniel P. Kennedy;Lynn K. Paul;Ralph Adolphs

  • Intact Bilateral Resting-State Networks in the Absence of the Corpus Callosum

    J. Michael Tyszka;Daniel P. Kennedy;Ralph Adolphs;Lynn K. Paul

  • Differential electrophysiological response during rest, self-referential, and non–self-referential tasks in human posteromedial cortex

    Mohammad Dastjerdi;Brett L. Foster;Sharmin Nasrullah;Andreas M. Rauschecker

  • Idiosyncratic brain activation patterns are associated with poor social comprehension in autism.

    Lisa Byrge;Julien Dubois;J. Michael Tyszka;Ralph Adolphs

  • Agenesis of the corpus callosum and autism: a comprehensive comparison

    Lynn K. Paul;Christina Corsello;Daniel P. Kennedy;Ralph Adolphs

  • Perception of Emotions from Facial Expressions in High-Functioning Adults with Autism.

    Daniel P. Kennedy;Ralph Adolphs

  • Genetic Influence on Eye Movements to Complex Scenes at Short Timescales

    Daniel P. Kennedy;Brian M. D’Onofrio;Patrick D. Quinn;Sven Bölte

  • fMRI during natural sleep as a method to study brain function during early childhood.

    Elizabeth Redcay;Daniel P. Kennedy;Eric Courchesne;Eric Courchesne

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph Adolphs
Ralph Adolphs California Institute of Technology
Eric Courchesne
Eric Courchesne University of California, San Diego
Sven Bölte
Sven Bölte Karolinska Institute
Brian M. D’Onofrio
Brian M. D’Onofrio Indiana University
Terje Falck-Ytter
Terje Falck-Ytter Uppsala University
Richard F. Betzel
Richard F. Betzel Indiana University
Elizabeth Redcay
Elizabeth Redcay University of Maryland, College Park
Michael P. Milham
Michael P. Milham Child Mind Institute
Chen Yu
Chen Yu The University of Texas at Austin
Paul Lichtenstein
Paul Lichtenstein Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience in the USA can open the door to exciting career possibilities. For those interested in maximizing future earnings, check out the most lucrative majors to see how Neuroscience compares to other in-demand fields.

Many students today are also considering flexibility and affordability. Opting for online study can be a smart choice; there are a variety of cheap online colleges that accept FAFSA and make it easier to manage the cost of higher education.

Not sure if you’re ready for a full degree? Earning online certifications can boost your credentials in a shorter period of time and may help you qualify for entry-level roles in healthcare, research, or data analysis.

If balancing work, life, and education is a concern, you might also explore the easy university degrees available online, many of which allow for a lighter workload without sacrificing quality.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel P. Kennedy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles