World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel P. Kennedy

Daniel P. Kennedy

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
12396
World Ranking
9090
National Ranking
3832

Daniel P. Kennedy publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel P. Kennedy sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 81 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Daniel P. Kennedy D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel P. Kennedy sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel P. Kennedy is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience as a subfield. Other subfields they have contributed to include Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Global and Planetary Change, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Autism Spectrum Disorder Research, Neural dynamics and brain function, Mental Health Research Topics, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Climate variability and models, and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies.

Among their frequent coauthors are Lisa Byrge, Richard F. Betzel, Dorit Kliemann, Olaf Sporns, and Jacob Tanner, indicating collaborative engagement in research projects across related domains.

Daniel P. Kennedy has published in various scientific venues, with a notable number of papers appearing in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Human Brain Mapping, Scientific Reports, Molecular Autism, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Key recent publications include:

  • High-amplitude cofluctuations in cortical activity drive functional connectivity (2020), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Nonreplication of functional connectivity differences in autism spectrum disorder across multiple sites and denoising strategies (2020), Human Brain Mapping
  • Trends and Drivers of Terrestrial Sources and Sinks of Carbon Dioxide: An Overview of the TRENDY Project (2024), Global Biogeochemical Cycles
  • Pervasive alterations to snow-dominated ecosystem functions under climate change (2022), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Temporal fluctuations in the brain's modular architecture during movie-watching (2020), NeuroImage

Best Publications

  • The autism brain imaging data exchange: towards a large-scale evaluation of the intrinsic brain architecture in autism

    A Di Martino;C-G Yan;Q Li;E Denio

  • Mapping early brain development in autism.

    Eric Courchesne;Karen Pierce;Cynthia M. Schumann;Elizabeth Redcay

  • The social brain in psychiatric and neurological disorders.

    Daniel P. Kennedy;Ralph Adolphs

  • Failing to deactivate: Resting functional abnormalities in autism

    Daniel P. Kennedy;Elizabeth Redcay;Eric Courchesne

  • Enhancing studies of the connectome in autism using the autism brain imaging data exchange II

    Adriana Di Martino;David O'Connor;David O'Connor;Bosi Chen;Kaat Alaerts

  • The intrinsic functional organization of the brain is altered in autism

    Daniel P. Kennedy;Eric Courchesne;Eric Courchesne

  • Neurotypical Peers are Less Willing to Interact with Those with Autism based on Thin Slice Judgments

    Noah J. Sasson;Daniel J. Faso;Jack Nugent;Sarah Lovell

  • Personal space regulation by the human amygdala

    Daniel P Kennedy;Jan Gläscher;J Michael Tyszka;Ralph Adolphs

  • Atypical Visual Saliency in Autism Spectrum Disorder Quantified through Model-Based Eye Tracking

    Shuo Wang;Ming Jiang;Xavier Morin Duchesne;Elizabeth A. Laugeson

  • The autistic brain: birth through adulthood.

    Eric Courchesne;Elizabeth Redcay;Daniel P Kennedy

  • Functional abnormalities of the default network during self- and other-reflection in autism

    Daniel P. Kennedy;Eric Courchesne

  • Autism at the beginning: microstructural and growth abnormalities underlying the cognitive and behavioral phenotype of autism.

    Eric Courchesne;Elizabeth Redcay;John T. Morgan;Daniel P. Kennedy

  • High-amplitude cofluctuations in cortical activity drive functional connectivity.

    Farnaz Zamani Esfahlani;Youngheun Jo;Joshua Faskowitz;Lisa Byrge

  • Largely Typical Patterns of Resting-State Functional Connectivity in High-Functioning Adults with Autism

    J. Michael Tyszka;Daniel P. Kennedy;Lynn K. Paul;Ralph Adolphs

  • Intact Bilateral Resting-State Networks in the Absence of the Corpus Callosum

    J. Michael Tyszka;Daniel P. Kennedy;Ralph Adolphs;Lynn K. Paul

  • Differential electrophysiological response during rest, self-referential, and non–self-referential tasks in human posteromedial cortex

    Mohammad Dastjerdi;Brett L. Foster;Sharmin Nasrullah;Andreas M. Rauschecker

  • Idiosyncratic brain activation patterns are associated with poor social comprehension in autism.

    Lisa Byrge;Julien Dubois;J. Michael Tyszka;Ralph Adolphs

  • Agenesis of the corpus callosum and autism: a comprehensive comparison

    Lynn K. Paul;Christina Corsello;Daniel P. Kennedy;Ralph Adolphs

  • Perception of Emotions from Facial Expressions in High-Functioning Adults with Autism.

    Daniel P. Kennedy;Ralph Adolphs

  • Genetic Influence on Eye Movements to Complex Scenes at Short Timescales

    Daniel P. Kennedy;Brian M. D’Onofrio;Patrick D. Quinn;Sven Bölte

  • fMRI during natural sleep as a method to study brain function during early childhood.

    Elizabeth Redcay;Daniel P. Kennedy;Eric Courchesne;Eric Courchesne

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph Adolphs
Ralph Adolphs California Institute of Technology
Eric Courchesne
Eric Courchesne University of California, San Diego
Sven Bölte
Sven Bölte Karolinska Institute
Brian M. D’Onofrio
Brian M. D’Onofrio Indiana University
Terje Falck-Ytter
Terje Falck-Ytter Uppsala University
Richard F. Betzel
Richard F. Betzel Indiana University
Elizabeth Redcay
Elizabeth Redcay University of Maryland, College Park
Michael P. Milham
Michael P. Milham Child Mind Institute
Chen Yu
Chen Yu The University of Texas at Austin
Paul Lichtenstein
Paul Lichtenstein Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience in the USA can open the door to exciting career possibilities. For those interested in maximizing future earnings, check out the most lucrative majors to see how Neuroscience compares to other in-demand fields.

Many students today are also considering flexibility and affordability. Opting for online study can be a smart choice; there are a variety of cheap online colleges that accept FAFSA and make it easier to manage the cost of higher education.

Not sure if you’re ready for a full degree? Earning online certifications can boost your credentials in a shorter period of time and may help you qualify for entry-level roles in healthcare, research, or data analysis.

If balancing work, life, and education is a concern, you might also explore the easy university degrees available online, many of which allow for a lighter workload without sacrificing quality.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel P. Kennedy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles