World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
20
Citations
1371
World Ranking
2024
National Ranking
998

Daniel M. Smith publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Smith sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 99 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Daniel M. Smith D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Smith sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 20 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Parliamentary Control of Coalition Governments

    Kaare Strøm;Wolfgang C. Müller;Daniel Markham Smith

  • Political dynasties and the incumbency advantage in party-centered environments

    Jon H. Fiva;Daniel M. Smith

  • Identifying voter preferences for politicians’ personal attributes: a conjoint experiment in Japan

    Yusaku Horiuchi;Daniel M. Smith;Teppei Yamamoto

  • Political Dynasties and the Selection of Cabinet Ministers

    Daniel M. Smith;Shane Martin

  • Just a Number? Voter Evaluations of Age in Candidate-Choice Experiments

    Unknown

  • The Roots of American Foreign Policy: An Analysis of Power and Purpose.

    Unknown

  • Measuring the Competitiveness of Elections

    Gary W. Cox;Jon H. Fiva;Daniel M. Smith

  • Parties, Legislators, and the Origins of Proportional Representation

    Gary W. Cox;Jon H. Fiva;Daniel M. Smith

  • Coalition Government and Party Mandate: How Coalition Agreements Constrain Ministerial Action

    Unknown

  • Gender and Dynastic Political Selection

    Olle Folke;Johanna Rickne;Daniel M. Smith

  • The Contraction Effect: How Proportional Representation Affects Mobilization and Turnout

    Gary W. Cox;Jon H. Fiva;Daniel M. Smith

  • Colonel House in Paris: A Study of American Policy at the Paris Peace Conference, 1919

    Unknown

  • Heir to Empire: United States Economic Diplomacy, 1916-1923

    Unknown

  • Local candidates and voter mobilization: Evidence from historical two-round elections in Norway

    Jon H. Fiva;Daniel M. Smith

  • Candidate selection methods and policy cohesion in parties The impact of open recruitment in Japan

    Daniel M Smith;Hidenori Tsutsumi

  • Moral hazard in electoral teams: List rank and campaign effort

    Gary W. Cox;Jon H. Fiva;Daniel M. Smith;Rune J. Sørensen

  • Norwegian parliamentary elections, 1906–2013: representation and turnout across four electoral systems

    Jon H. Fiva;Daniel M. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary W. Cox
Gary W. Cox Stanford University
Yusaku Horiuchi
Yusaku Horiuchi Dartmouth College
Olle Folke
Olle Folke Uppsala University
Shane Martin
Shane Martin University of Essex
Benny Geys
Benny Geys BI Norwegian Business School
Wolfgang C. Müller
Wolfgang C. Müller University of Vienna
Kaare Strøm
Kaare Strøm University of California, San Diego
Gerard J. Nuovo
Gerard J. Nuovo The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniel M. Smith

Recently Published Articles