| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 40 | 3865 | 3616 | 961 | 862 | 113 | 7251 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel G. Panaccione between 1988 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel G. Panaccione published across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2001. 5 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.
117 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1988 | 1 |
| 1989 | 3 |
| 1990 | 3 |
| 1991 | 1 |
| 1992 | 3 |
| 1993 | 2 |
| 1994 | 0 |
| 1995 | 1 |
| 1996 | 3 |
| 1997 | 2 |
| 1998 | 3 |
| 1999 | 0 |
| 2000 | 0 |
| 2001 | 7 |
| 2002 | 1 |
| 2003 | 3 |
| 2004 | 2 |
| 2005 | 5 |
| 2006 | 5 |
| 2007 | 4 |
| 2008 | 2 |
| 2009 | 2 |
| 2010 | 5 |
| 2011 | 1 |
| 2012 | 4 |
| 2013 | 4 |
| 2014 | 4 |
| 2015 | 5 |
| 2016 | 3 |
| 2017 | 6 |
| 2018 | 5 |
| 2019 | 7 |
| 2020 | 3 |
| 2021 | 5 |
| 2022 | 2 |
| 2023 | 3 |
| 2024 | 2 |
| 2025 | 4 |
| 2026 | 1 |
| Total | 117 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel G. Panaccione sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 113 publications — 34th percentile
34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 36–40 | 2 | |
| 41–45 | 7 | |
| 46–50 | 40 | |
| 51–55 | 58 | |
| 56–60 | 60 | |
| 61–65 | 107 | |
| 66–70 | 130 | |
| 71–75 | 153 | |
| 76–80 | 191 | |
| 81–85 | 199 | |
| 86–90 | 206 | |
| 91–95 | 218 | |
| 96–100 | 226 | |
| 101–105 | 227 | |
| 106–110 | 247 | |
| 111–115 | 255 | 113 |
| 116–120 | 253 | |
| 121–125 | 233 | |
| 126–130 | 219 | |
| 131–135 | 201 | |
| 136–140 | 194 | |
| 141–145 | 176 | |
| 146–150 | 157 | |
| 151–155 | 147 | |
| 156–160 | 151 | |
| 161–165 | 159 | |
| 166–170 | 137 | |
| 171–175 | 128 | |
| 176–180 | 126 | |
| 181–185 | 98 | |
| 186–190 | 114 | |
| 191–195 | 100 | |
| 196–200 | 90 | |
| 201–205 | 71 | |
| 206–210 | 98 | |
| 211–215 | 70 | |
| 216–220 | 86 | |
| 221–225 | 61 | |
| 226–230 | 58 | |
| 231–235 | 53 | |
| 236–240 | 64 | |
| 241–245 | 39 | |
| 246–250 | 46 | |
| 251–255 | 51 | |
| 256–260 | 36 | |
| 261–265 | 44 | |
| 266–270 | 35 | |
| 271–275 | 30 | |
| 276–280 | 33 | |
| 281–285 | 35 | |
| 286–290 | 36 | |
| 291–295 | 26 | |
| 296–300 | 26 | |
| 301–305 | 31 | |
| 306–310 | 30 | |
| 311–315 | 21 | |
| 316–320 | 29 | |
| 321–325 | 14 | |
| 326–330 | 15 | |
| 331–335 | 15 | |
| 336–340 | 17 | |
| 341–345 | 15 | |
| 346–350 | 12 | |
| 351–355 | 17 | |
| 356–360 | 18 | |
| 361–365 | 12 | |
| 366–370 | 11 | |
| 371–375 | 6 | |
| 376–380 | 6 | |
| 381–385 | 11 | |
| 386–390 | 9 | |
| 391–395 | 10 | |
| 396–400 | 8 | |
| 401–405 | 4 | |
| 406–410 | 9 | |
| 411–415 | 11 | |
| 416–420 | 4 | |
| 421–425 | 7 | |
| 426–430 | 4 | |
| 431–435 | 3 | |
| 436–440 | 5 | |
| 441–445 | 8 | |
| 446–450 | 6 | |
| 451–455 | 7 | |
| 456–460 | 5 | |
| 461–465 | 6 | |
| 466 | 2 | |
| 467+ | 99 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel G. Panaccione sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 40 D-Index — 42nd percentile
42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 200 | |
| 31 | 236 | |
| 32 | 253 | |
| 33 | 283 | |
| 34 | 288 | |
| 35 | 240 | |
| 36 | 246 | |
| 37 | 243 | |
| 38 | 247 | |
| 39 | 229 | |
| 40 | 232 | 40 |
| 41 | 230 | |
| 42 | 228 | |
| 43 | 219 | |
| 44 | 193 | |
| 45 | 164 | |
| 46 | 158 | |
| 47 | 143 | |
| 48 | 131 | |
| 49 | 127 | |
| 50 | 122 | |
| 51 | 122 | |
| 52 | 110 | |
| 53 | 102 | |
| 54 | 98 | |
| 55 | 79 | |
| 56 | 85 | |
| 57 | 88 | |
| 58 | 91 | |
| 59 | 62 | |
| 60 | 61 | |
| 61 | 59 | |
| 62 | 54 | |
| 63 | 61 | |
| 64 | 59 | |
| 65 | 58 | |
| 66 | 41 | |
| 67 | 49 | |
| 68 | 39 | |
| 69 | 32 | |
| 70 | 40 | |
| 71 | 47 | |
| 72 | 38 | |
| 73 | 28 | |
| 74 | 29 | |
| 75 | 28 | |
| 76 | 22 | |
| 77 | 21 | |
| 78 | 25 | |
| 79 | 26 | |
| 80 | 19 | |
| 81 | 16 | |
| 82 | 12 | |
| 83 | 16 | |
| 84 | 14 | |
| 85 | 11 | |
| 86 | 17 | |
| 87 | 13 | |
| 88 | 10 | |
| 89 | 12 | |
| 90 | 18 | |
| 91 | 16 | |
| 92 | 16 | |
| 93 | 17 | |
| 94 | 12 | |
| 95 | 8 | |
| 96 | 9 | |
| 97 | 9 | |
| 98 | 11 | |
| 99 | 12 | |
| 100 | 5 | |
| 101 | 8 | |
| 102 | 4 | |
| 103 | 11 | |
| 104 | 5 | |
| 105 | 9 | |
| 106 | 7 | |
| 107 | 4 | |
| 108 | 8 | |
| 109+ | 99 |
Richard J. O'Connell;Michael R. Thon;Stéphane Hacquard;Stefan G. Amyotte
Christopher L. Schardl;Carolyn A. Young;Uljana Hesse;Stefan G. Amyotte
John W. Pitkin;Daniel G. Panaccione;Jonathan D. Walton
Christopher L Schardl;Daniel G Panaccione;Paul Tudzynski
John S. Scott-Craig;Daniel G. Panaccione;Felice Cervone;Jonathan D. Walton
Daniel G. Panaccione;Richard D. Johnson;Jinghong Wang;Carolyn A. Young
Daniel G. Panaccione;John S. Scott-Craig;Jean-Alain Pocard;Jonathan D. Walton
Unknown
Jinghong Wang;Caroline Machado;Daniel G. Panaccione;Huei-Fung Tsai
Christopher L. Schardl;Carolyn A. Young;Juan Pan;Simona Florea
Thomas Haarmann;Caroline Machado;Yvonne Lübbe;Telmo Correia
Unknown
Jonathan D. Walton;Daniel G. Panaccione
Unknown
Carolyn A. Young;Christopher L. Schardl;Daniel G. Panaccione;Simona Florea
Unknown
Simona Florea;Daniel G Panaccione;Christopher L Schardl
Daniel G. Panaccione;Jessica R. Cipoletti;Andrea B. Sedlock;Kenneth P. Blemings
Christine M. Coyle;Johnathan Z. Cheng;Sarah E. O'Connor;Daniel G. Panaccione
Daniel A. Potter;J. Tyler Stokes;Carl T. Redmond;Christopher L. Schardl
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.