World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
73
Citations
18451
World Ranking
797
National Ranking
24

Coen J. Ritsema publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Coen J. Ritsema sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 278 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Coen J. Ritsema D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Coen J. Ritsema sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Agriculture
  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem

His primary areas of study are Hydrology, Soil water, Water content, Soil science and Infiltration. The various areas that Coen J. Ritsema examines in his Hydrology study include Vegetation and Soil horizon. His Soil water research integrates issues from Wetting and Surface water.

His Water content study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Leaching, Groundwater, Peat, Moisture and Loam. Coen J. Ritsema works mostly in the field of Infiltration, limiting it down to concerns involving Vadose zone and, occasionally, Ponding, Porous medium and Capillary action. His studies in Surface runoff integrate themes in fields like Shrubland and Temporal scales.

His most cited work include:

  • Preferential flow in water repellent sandy soils: principles and modeling implications (122 citations)
  • Response of soil dissolved organic matter to microplastic addition in Chinese loess soil. (118 citations)
  • Exponential increase of publications related to soil water repellency (113 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Hydrology, Soil water, Soil science, Water content and Surface runoff. His work in the fields of Hydrology, such as Erosion, Infiltration and Drainage basin, overlaps with other areas such as Water flow. His research on Soil water frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Environmental chemistry.

His Soil science study frequently involves adjacent topics like Wetting. His Water content research includes themes of Moisture, Organic matter, Loam and Groundwater. His work carried out in the field of Surface runoff brings together such families of science as Soil biodiversity, Shrubland, Loess and Soil retrogression and degradation.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Hydrology (38.08%)
  • Soil water (35.15%)
  • Soil science (24.69%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?

  • Hydrology (38.08%)
  • Surface runoff (20.92%)
  • Erosion (13.81%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Hydrology, Surface runoff, Erosion, Environmental resource management and Soil water. His Hydrology research integrates issues from Sediment and Topsoil. The concepts of his Surface runoff study are interwoven with issues in Organic matter, Fire frequency and Flume.

Coen J. Ritsema combines subjects such as Mulch, Climate change and Soil retrogression and degradation with his study of Erosion. The various areas that he examines in his Environmental resource management study include Agriculture, Land degradation, Desertification and Sustainable land management. The subject of his Soil water research is within the realm of Soil science.

Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Response of soil dissolved organic matter to microplastic addition in Chinese loess soil. (118 citations)
  • Evaluating sediment storage dams: structural off-site sediment trapping measures in northwest Ethiopia (82 citations)
  • Persistence of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in loess soil under different combinations of temperature, soil moisture and light/darkness. (71 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Agriculture
  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem

Coen J. Ritsema focuses on Hydrology, Surface runoff, Erosion, Environmental resource management and Drainage basin. Many of his research projects under Hydrology are closely connected to Outflow with Outflow, tying the diverse disciplines of science together. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Soil science, Vegetation and Soil horizon.

His study in Topsoil and Soil water falls under the purview of Soil science. His Environmental resource management research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Desertification, Land management, Sustainable land management, Sustainability and Land degradation. The Drainage basin study combines topics in areas such as Sediment, Hydrology and Water resources.

Best Publications

  • Emerging pollutants in the environment: a challenge for water resource management

    Violette Geissen;Hans Mol;Erwin Klumpp;Günter Umlauf

  • How water moves in a water repellent sandy soil: 1. Potential and actual water repellency

    Louis W. Dekker;Coen J. Ritsema

  • The threat of soil salinity: A European scale review

    I.N. Daliakopoulos;I.K. Tsanis;I.K. Tsanis;A. Koutroulis;N.N. Kourgialas

  • LISEM: a single-event physically based hydrological and soil erosion model for drainage basins; I: theory, input and output

    Unknown

  • Water Repellency and Critical Soil Water Content in a Dune Sand

    Louis W. Dekker;Stefan H. Doerr;Klaas Oostindie;Apostolos K. Ziogas

  • Preferential flow mechanism in a water repellent sandy soil

    Coen J. Ritsema;Louis W. Dekker;J. M. H. Hendrickx;W. Hamminga

  • How water moves in a water repellent sandy soil: 2. Dynamics of fingered flow

    Coen J. Ritsema;Louis W. Dekker

  • Occurrence, prediction and hydrological effects of water repellency amongst major soil and land-use types in a humid temperate climate

    S. H. Doerr;R. A. Shakesby;L. W. Dekker;C. J. Ritsema

  • Wetting patterns and moisture variability in water repellent Dutch soils.

    L.W Dekker;C.J. Ritsema

  • Physics of water repellent soils

    T. W.J. Bauters;T. S. Steenhuis;David DiCarlo;J. L. Nieber

  • Effects of wildfire on soil nutrients in Mediterranean ecosystems

    Lucrezia Caon;V. Ramón Vallejo;Coen J. Ritsema;Violette Geissen

  • Factors affecting farmers' behaviour in pesticide use: insights from a field study in northern China

    Liangxin Fan;Haipeng Niu;Xiaomei Yang;Wei Qin

  • Extension of a GIS procedure for calculating the RUSLE equation LS factor

    Hongming Zhang;Qinke Yang;Rui Li;Qingrui Liu

  • Use of barley straw residues to avoid high erosion and runoff rates on persimmon plantations in Eastern Spain under low frequency–high magnitude simulated rainfall events

    Artemi Cerdà;Óscar González-Pelayo;Antonio Giménez-Morera;Antonio Jordán

  • Persistence of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in loess soil under different combinations of temperature, soil moisture and light/darkness.

    Celia Martins Bento;Xiaomei Yang;Gerrit Gort;Sha Xue

  • Modeling and field evidence of finger formation and finger recurrence in a water repellent sandy soil

    Coen J. Ritsema;Louis W. Dekker;John L. Nieber;Tammo S. Steenhuis

  • EFFECT OF DRYING TEMPERATURE ON THE SEVERITY OF SOIL WATER REPELLENCY

    Louis W. Dekker;Coen J. Ritsema;Klaas Oostindie;Obbe H. Boersma

  • Occurrence of soil water repellency in arid and humid climates

    D.F. Jaramillo;L.W. Dekker;C.J. Ritsema;J.M.H. Hendrickx

  • Preferential Flow Paths in a Water Repellent Clay Soil with Grass Cover

    Louis W. Dekker;Coen J. Ritsema

  • Extraction of compounds associated with water repellency in sandy soils of different origin

    S. H. Doerr;C. T. Llewellyn;P. Douglas;C. P. Morley

  • Water repellency of soils; the influence of ambient relative humidity

    S. H. Doerr;L. W. Dekker;C. J. Ritsema;R. A. Shakesby

Frequent Co-Authors

Louis W. Dekker
Louis W. Dekker Wageningen University & Research
Violette Geissen
Violette Geissen Wageningen University & Research
António Ferreira
António Ferreira Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra
Tammo S. Steenhuis
Tammo S. Steenhuis Cornell University
Guobin Liu
Guobin Liu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Xingmin Mu
Xingmin Mu Northwest A&F University
Jan Jacob Keizer
Jan Jacob Keizer University of Aveiro
Victor Jetten
Victor Jetten University of Twente
Saskia Keesstra
Saskia Keesstra Wageningen University & Research
Celeste Coelho
Celeste Coelho University of Aveiro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science through online education opens doors to diverse career pathways. For military veterans interested in expanding their skills, programs like the online Spanish degree for military veterans highlight opportunities to combine language proficiency with environmental and geological expertise, enhancing communication in global scientific fields.

Creative professionals might consider integrating artistic perspectives via an mfa online, which can complement Earth Science studies by fostering innovative approaches to data visualization and environmental advocacy.

For those aiming to lead teams or manage projects within environmental organizations, obtaining a best online master degree in human resource management offers vital leadership and organizational skills that are crucial for career advancement in science-based industries.

Additionally, many seniors seeking career changes or enrichment can explore flexible options like one year degree programs for seniors, providing accelerated pathways to gain new knowledge in Earth Science or related fields without long-term commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Coen J. Ritsema

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles