World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Microbiology

D-Index
42
Citations
10934
World Ranking
5314
National Ranking
134

Bernard Berger publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard Berger sits on this spectrum.

55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 264 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 233 scientists 205–214 publications: 207 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55 publications 679+

This scientist: 88 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

Bernard Berger D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard Berger sits on this spectrum.

40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 111 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 122 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 93 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum reflects its adaptation to the human gastrointestinal tract

    Mark A. Schell;Maria Karmirantzou;Berend Snel;David Vilanova

  • The anxiolytic effect of Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 involves vagal pathways for gut–brain communication

    P. Bercik;A. J. Park;D. Sinclair;A. Khoshdel

  • Probiotic Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 Reduces Depression Scores and Alters Brain Activity: A Pilot Study in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

    Maria Ines Pinto-Sanchez;Geoffrey B. Hall;Kathy Ghajar;Andrea Nardelli

  • The genome sequence of the probiotic intestinal bacterium Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC 533

    R. David Pridmore;Bernard Berger;Frank Desiere;David Vilanova

  • Calypso: a user-friendly web-server for mining and visualizing microbiome–environment interactions

    Martha Zakrzewski;Carla Proietti;Jonathan J. Ellis;Shihab Hasan;Shihab Hasan

  • Oral Phage Therapy of Acute Bacterial Diarrhea With Two Coliphage Preparations: A Randomized Trial in Children From Bangladesh

    Shafiqul Alam Sarker;Shamima Sultana;Gloria Reuteler;Deborah Moine

  • Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC1.3724 supplementation on weight loss and maintenance in obese men and women

    Marina Sanchez;Christian Darimont;Vicky Drapeau;Shahram Emady-Azar

  • Colonization-Induced Host-Gut Microbial Metabolic Interaction

    Sandrine P. Claus;Sandrine L. Ellero;Bernard Berger;Lutz Krause

  • Dynamics of Infant Gut Microbiota Are Influenced by Delivery Mode and Gestational Duration and Are Associated with Subsequent Adiposity

    Shaillay Dogra;Olga Sakwinska;Shu-E Soh;Catherine Ngom-Bru

  • Safety analysis of a Russian phage cocktail: from MetaGenomic analysis to oral application in healthy human subjects

    Shawna McCallin;Shafiqul Alam Sarker;Caroline Barretto;Shamima Sultana

  • Oral T4-like phage cocktail application to healthy adult volunteers from Bangladesh.

    Shafiqul Alam Sarker;Shawna McCallin;Caroline Barretto;Bernard Berger

  • The Mouse Microbiome Is Required for Sex-Specific Diurnal Rhythms of Gene Expression and Metabolism

    Benjamin D. Weger;Cédric Gobet;Jake Yeung;Eva Martin

  • Identification of Genes Associated with the Long-Gut-Persistence Phenotype of the Probiotic Lactobacillus johnsonii Strain NCC533 Using a Combination of Genomics and Transcriptome Analysis

    Emmanuel Denou;Emmanuel Denou;Raymond David Pridmore;Bernard Berger;Jean-Michel Panoff

  • Cultivation of Borrelia burgdorferi from erythema migrans lesions and perilesional skin

    Unknown

  • Isolation and characterization of the Lyme disease spirochete from the skin of patients with erythema chronicum migrans

    Bernard W. Berger;Mark H. Kaplan;Israel R. Rothenberg;Alan G. Barbour

  • Linking Human Milk Oligosaccharides, Infant Fecal Community Types, and Later Risk To Require Antibiotics.

    Bernard Berger;Nadine Porta;Francis Foata;Dominik Grathwohl

  • Bloodstream invasion in early Lyme disease: Results from a prospective, controlled, blinded study using the polymerase chain reaction

    Jesse L. Goodman;John F. Bradley;Allan E. Ross;Paul Goellner

  • Investigation of the intestinal microbiota in preterm infants using different methods

    Carole Rougé;Oliver Goldenberg;Laurent Ferraris;Bernard Berger

  • Similarity and Differences in the Lactobacillus acidophilus Group Identified by Polyphasic Analysis and Comparative Genomics

    Bernard Berger;R. David Pridmore;Caroline Barretto;Françoise Delmas-Julien

  • Oral application of Escherichia coli bacteriophage: safety tests in healthy and diarrheal children from Bangladesh

    Shafiqul Alam Sarker;Bernard Berger;Ying Deng;Silas Kieser

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Recently Published Articles