World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea

Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
52
Citations
8769
World Ranking
13606
National Ranking
533

Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 189 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

Error in OpenAI API call: Error code: 500 - {'error': {'message': 'The server had an error while processing your request. Sorry about that!', 'type': 'server_error', 'param': None, 'code': None}}

Best Publications

  • Assessing the accuracy of metadynamics.

    Alessandro Laio;Antonio Rodriguez-Fortea;Francesco Luigi Gervasio;Matteo Ceccarelli

  • About the calculation of exchange coupling constants in polynuclear transition metal complexes.

    Eliseo Ruiz;Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea;Joan Cano;Santiago Alvarez

  • Endohedral metallofullerenes: a unique host–guest association

    Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea;Alan L. Balch;Josep M. Poblet

  • Exchange Coupling in Carboxylato‐Bridged Dinuclear Copper(II) Compounds: A Density Functional Study

    Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea;Pere Alemany;Santiago Alvarez;Eliseo Ruiz

  • Exchange coupling of transition-metal ions through hydrogen bonding: a theoretical investigation.

    Cédric Desplanches;Eliseo Ruiz;and Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea;Santiago Alvarez

  • The Smallest Stable Fullerene, M@C28 (M = Ti, Zr, U): Stabilization and Growth from Carbon Vapor

    Paul W. Dunk;Nathan K. Kaiser;Marc Mulet-Gas;Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea

  • The maximum pentagon separation rule provides a guideline for the structures of endohedral metallofullerenes

    Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea;Núria Alegret;Alan L. Balch;Josep M. Poblet

  • Is It Possible To Get High TC Magnets with Prussian Blue Analogues? A Theoretical Prospect

    Eliseo Ruiz;Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea;Santiago Alvarez;Michel Verdaguer;Michel Verdaguer

  • The Shape of the Sc2(μ2-S) Unit Trapped in C82: Crystallographic, Computational, and Electrochemical Studies of the Isomers, Sc2(μ2-S)@Cs(6)-C82 and Sc2(μ2-S)@C3v(8)-C82

    Brandon Q. Mercado;Ning Chen;Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea;Mary A. Mackey

  • Sc2(μ2-O) Trapped in a Fullerene Cage: The Isolation and Structural Characterization of Sc2(μ2-O)@Cs(6)-C82 and the Relevance of the Thermal and Entropic Effects in Fullerene Isomer Selection

    Brandon Q. Mercado;Melissa A. Stuart;Mary A. Mackey;Jane E. Pickens

  • Density functional study of magnetostructural correlations in cubane complexes containing the Cu4O4 core

    Javier Tercero;Eliseo Ruiz;Santiago Alvarez;Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea

  • "Open rather than closed" malonate methano-fullerene derivatives. The formation of methanofulleroid adducts of Y3N@C80.

    Olena Lukoyanova;Claudia M. Cardona;José Rivera;† Leyda Z. Lugo-Morales

  • Exchange coupling in halo-bridged dinuclear Cu(II) compounds: a density functional study.

    Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea;Pere Alemany;Santiago Alvarez;Eliseo Ruiz

  • Sc2S@C(s)(10528)-C72: a dimetallic sulfide endohedral fullerene with a non isolated pentagon rule cage.

    Ning Chen;Christine M. Beavers;Marc Mulet-Gas;Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea

  • Density functional study of the exchange coupling in distorted cubane complexes containing the Cu4O4 core

    Eliseo Ruiz;Antonio Rodrı́guez-Fortea;Pere Alemany;Santiago Alvarez

  • Synthesis of a new endohedral fullerene family, Sc2S@C2n (n = 40-50) by the introduction of SO2.

    Ning Chen;Manuel N. Chaur;Cheryl Moore;Julio R. Pinzón

  • Metal Nitride Cluster Fullerene M3N@C80 (M=Y, Sc) Based Dyads: Synthesis, and Electrochemical, Theoretical and Photophysical Studies

    Julio R. Pinzón;Claudia M. Cardona;Claudia M. Cardona;Maria Ángeles Herranz;Marta E. Plonska-Brzezinska;Marta E. Plonska-Brzezinska

  • U2@Ih(7)-C80: Crystallographic Characterization of a Long-Sought Dimetallic Actinide Endohedral Fullerene

    Xingxing Zhang;Yaofeng Wang;Roser Morales-Martínez;Jun Zhong

  • Electronic Structure and Redox Properties of Metal Nitride Endohedral Fullerenes M3N@C2n (M=Sc, Y, La, and Gd; 2n=80, 84, 88, 92, 96)

    Ramón Valencia;Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea;Anna Clotet;Coen de Graaf;Coen de Graaf

  • Exchange coupling in transition-metal complexes via density-functional theory: comparison and reliability of different basis set approaches.

    Eliseo Ruiz;Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea;Javier Tercero;Thomas Cauchy

  • Trimetallic nitride endohedral fullerenes: experimental and theoretical evidence for the M3N6+@C2n6- model.

    Manuel N. Chaur;Ramón Valencia;Antonio Rodríguez‐Fortea;Josep M. Poblet

Frequent Co-Authors

Josep M. Poblet
Josep M. Poblet Rovira i Virgili University
Luis Echegoyen
Luis Echegoyen The University of Texas at El Paso
Pere Alemany
Pere Alemany University of Barcelona
Enric Canadell
Enric Canadell Institut de Ciència de Materials de Barcelona
Eliseo Ruiz
Eliseo Ruiz University of Barcelona
Santiago Alvarez
Santiago Alvarez University of Barcelona
Alan L. Balch
Alan L. Balch University of California, Davis
Patrick Batail
Patrick Batail University of Angers
Marilyn M. Olmstead
Marilyn M. Olmstead University of California, Davis
Josef Michl
Josef Michl University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens the door to various specialized career paths. For those interested in the healthcare sales industry, learning how to get into pharmaceutical sales can be a rewarding option that blends scientific knowledge with customer relations and business skills.

If you’re aiming for a more clinical role, understanding how much schooling to be a pharmacist is crucial. Pharmacists require advanced education and training, often involving a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) degree, which builds on foundational chemistry and biology concepts.

For those drawn to forensic sciences, becoming an autopsy technician is an intriguing career choice. Discovering autopsy tech roles highlights the importance of specialized education and the critical role these professionals play in legal and medical investigations.

Exploring online forensic science courses offers flexible study opportunities for students wanting to apply chemistry towards criminal justice and forensic analysis. These programs provide practical skills that complement a solid chemistry background and prepare graduates for diverse roles in the forensic field.

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Rodríguez-Fortea

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles