World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
66
Citations
20242
World Ranking
2587
National Ranking
1147

Anthony R. Cashmore publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony R. Cashmore sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 100 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Anthony R. Cashmore D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony R. Cashmore sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony R. Cashmore is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. This association situates them within a leading academic institution known for its research contributions across various disciplines.

While specific data on publications, including recent papers, co-authors, and book publications, are not available, the information about their professional background is useful for contextual understanding of their academic environment.

Given the absence of detailed information on the scientist's fields or subfields of study, main topics of research, or frequent publication venues, it is not possible to outline any particular scientific focus or thematic areas. Similarly, no records of awards have been provided.

Despite the limited available data, the affiliation with a major research university such as the University of Pennsylvania suggests an active engagement in academic and possibly interdisciplinary research activities.

Best Publications

  • HY4 gene of A. thaliana encodes a protein with characteristics of a blue-light photoreceptor

    Margaret Ahmad;Anthony R. Cashmore

  • Cryptochromes: Blue Light Receptors for Plants and Animals

    Anthony R. Cashmore;Jose A. Jarillo;Ying-Jie Wu;Dongmei Liu

  • An evolutionarily conserved protein binding sequence upstream of a plant light-regulated gene.

    G Giuliano;E Pichersky;V S Malik;M P Timko

  • Light-Regulated Transcription

    William B. Terzaghi;Anthony R. Cashmore

  • Enhancement of blue-light sensitivity of Arabidopsis seedlings by a blue light receptor cryptochrome 2

    Chentao Lin;Hongyun Yang;Hongwei Guo;Todd Mockler

  • Phototropin-related NPL1 controls chloroplast relocation induced by blue light

    Jose A. Jarillo;Halina Gabrys;Juan Capel;Juan Capel;Jose M. Alonso;Jose M. Alonso

  • Association of Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide with the Arabidopsis Blue Light Receptor CRY1

    Chentao Lin;D. E. Robertson;M. Ahmad;A. A. Raibekas

  • The G-box: a ubiquitous regulatory DNA element in plants bound by the GBF family of bZIP proteins.

    Anne E. Menkens;Ulrike Schindler;Anthony R. Cashmore

  • Chimaeric gene coding for a transit peptide and a heterologous polypeptide

    Luis Herrera-Estrella;Guidi Van Den Broeck;Marc Van Montagu;Peter Schreier

  • The C Termini of Arabidopsis Cryptochromes Mediate a Constitutive Light Response

    Hong Quan Yang;Ying Jie Wu;Ru Hang Tang;Dongmei Liu

  • The signaling mechanism of Arabidopsis CRY1 involves direct interaction with COP1.

    Hong Quan Yang;Ru Hang Tang;Anthony R. Cashmore

  • The Phototropin Family of Photoreceptors

    W.R. Briggs;C.F. Beck;A.R. Cashmore;J.M. Christie

  • The CRY1 Blue Light Photoreceptor of Arabidopsis Interacts with Phytochrome A In Vitro

    Margaret Ahmad;Jose A. Jarillo;Olga Smirnova;Anthony R. Cashmore

  • Mutation of either G box or I box sequences profoundly affects expression from the Arabidopsis rbcS‐1A promoter.

    R. G. K. Donald;A. R. Cashmore

  • Targeting of a foreign protein to chloroplasts by fusion to the transit peptide from the small subunit of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase.

    Guido Van den Broeck;Michael P. Timko;Albert P. Kausch;Anthony R. Cashmore

  • Cryptochromes: Enabling Plants and Animals to Determine Circadian Time

    Anthony R Cashmore

  • Nucleotide sequences of two pea cDNA clones encoding the small subunit of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase and the major chlorophyll a/b-binding thylakoid polypeptide.

    G Coruzzi;R Broglie;A Cashmore;N H Chua

  • Heterodimerization between light-regulated and ubiquitously expressed Arabidopsis GBF bZIP proteins.

    U. Schindler;A.E. Menkens;H. Beckmann;J.R. Ecker

  • HAT3.1, a novel Arabidopsis homeodomain protein containing a conserved cysteine‐rich region

    Ulrike Schindler;Holger Beckmann;Anthony R. Cashmore

  • Structure and expression of a pea nuclear gene encoding a chlorophyll a/b-binding polypeptide.

    Anthony R. Cashmore

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret Ahmad
Margaret Ahmad Xavier University
Luis Herrera-Estrella
Luis Herrera-Estrella Texas Tech University
Jose A. Jarillo
Jose A. Jarillo Technical University of Madrid
Michael P. Timko
Michael P. Timko University of Virginia
Joseph R. Ecker
Joseph R. Ecker Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Eran Pichersky
Eran Pichersky University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Hans J. Bohnert
Hans J. Bohnert University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Chentao Lin
Chentao Lin University of California, Los Angeles
Jeff Schell
Jeff Schell Max Planck Society
Nam-Hai Chua
Nam-Hai Chua National University of Singapore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA opens doors to diverse healthcare careers and educational paths. Many students interested in genetics also consider related programs like health administration, medical billing, and nursing, which offer strong job prospects and flexible online options.

If you’re looking for a role with critical administrative impacts, explore health administration degree programs. These can often be completed online and prepare graduates for leadership roles in the healthcare sector. For those in a hurry, online health administration programs offer accelerated options, helping you graduate faster.

Careers such as medical billing and coding are also in demand and can be a good starting point. If cost is a concern, you may ask, how much does it cost to become a medical billing and coding specialist? Affordable online courses are available, making this pathway accessible.

Those drawn to clinical work might consider nursing colleges with high acceptance rates. These institutions provide more opportunities for students to launch their nursing careers.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony R. Cashmore

Recently Published Articles