World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
58
Citations
14741
World Ranking
4126
National Ranking
364

Anthony K. P. Jones publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony K. P. Jones sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 168 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Anthony K. P. Jones D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony K. P. Jones sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony K. P. Jones is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their scholarly activity primarily focuses on medicine, with particular expertise in pharmacology, physiology, cognitive neuroscience, rheumatology, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's research contributions center on several key topics, including:

  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Pain mechanisms and treatments
  • Pain management and placebo effect
  • Osteoarthritis treatment and mechanisms
  • Psychosomatic disorders and their treatments
  • Fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome research
  • Long-term effects of COVID-19

Jones has published extensively, with recent papers including:

  • Long-term clinical outcomes in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus outbreaks after hospitalisation or ICU admission: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020), Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
  • A new integrated behavioural intervention for knee osteoarthritis: development and pilot study (2021), BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Is Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Effective for the Treatment of Pain in Fibromyalgia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2020), Journal of Pain
  • Effects of neurofeedback in the management of chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials (2020), European Journal of Pain
  • LONG-TERM CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN SURVIVORS OF CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAKS AFTER HOSPITALISATION OR ICU ADMISSION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF FOLLOW-UP STUDIES (2020), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jones include Manoj Sivan, Christopher Brown, Nelson J. Trujillo-Barreto, James Henshaw, and Alexander J. Casson.

Jones often publishes in venues such as:

  • European Journal of Pain
  • Frontiers in Pain Research
  • BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • The cortical representation of pain.

    Rolf Detlef Treede;Daniel R. Kenshalo;Richard Harvey Gracely;Anthony K.P. Jones

  • Pain processing during three levels of noxious stimulation produces differential patterns of central activity.

    Stuart W.G Derbyshire;Anthony K.P Jones;Ferenc Gyulai;Stuart Clark

  • Temporal difference models describe higher-order learning in humans

    Ben Seymour;John P. O'Doherty;Peter Dayan;Martin Koltzenburg

  • Cortical and subcortical localization of response to pain in man using positron emission tomography.

    A. K. P Jones;W. D. Brown;Karl John Friston;L. Y Qi

  • Long-term clinical outcomes in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus outbreaks after hospitalisation or ICU admission: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Hassaan Ahmed;Kajal Patel;Darren C Greenwood;Stephen Halpin

  • Pain Processing in Four Regions of Human Cingulate Cortex Localized with Co‐registered PET and MR Imaging

    Brent A. Vogt;Stuart Derbyshire;Anthony K. P. Jones

  • HORMONAL AND METABOLIC RESPONSES TO AN ENKEPHALIN ANALOGUE IN NORMAL MAN

    W.A Stubbs;A Jones;C.R.W Edwards;G Delitala

  • Attention to pain localization and unpleasantness discriminates the functions of the medial and lateral pain systems.

    B. Kulkarni;D. E. Bentley;R. Elliott;P. Youell

  • Cerebral responses to pain in patients with atypical facial pain measured by positron emission tomography.

    S. W. G. Derbyshire;A. K. P. Jones;P. Devani;K. J. Friston

  • Identification of human brain loci processing esophageal sensation using positron emission tomography

    Q Aziz;J L Andersson;S Valind;Anders Sundin

  • Pain and Stroop interference tasks activate separate processing modules in anterior cingulate cortex.

    S. W. G. Derbyshire;B. A. Vogt;A. K. P. Jones

  • Poststroke shoulder pain: a prospective study of the association and risk factors in 152 patients from a consecutive cohort of 205 patients presenting with stroke.

    Giles E. Gamble;Elisa Barberan;Hans Ulrich Laasch;David Bowsher

  • Arthritic pain is processed in brain areas concerned with emotions and fear

    Bhavna Kulkarni;D E Bentley;R Elliott;Peter J Julyan

  • Meditation experience predicts less negative appraisal of pain: electrophysiological evidence for the involvement of anticipatory neural responses.

    Christopher A. Brown;Anthony K.P. Jones

  • Modulation of pain ratings by expectation and uncertainty: Behavioral characteristics and anticipatory neural correlates.

    Christopher A. Brown;Ben Seymour;Yvonne Boyle;Wael El-Deredy

  • Chronic pain: a PET study of the central effects of percutaneous high cervical cordotomy

    V. Di Piero;V. Di Piero;A. K.P. Jones;F. Iannotti;M. Powell

  • Cerebral responses to a continual tonic pain stimulus measured using positron emission tomography

    S.W.G Derbyshire;A.K.P Jones

  • Reproducibility of placebo analgesia: Effect of dispositional optimism

    Debbie L. Morton;Alison Watson;Wael El-Deredy;Anthony K.P. Jones

  • In vivo distribution of opioid receptors in man in relation to the cortical projections of the medial and lateral pain systems measured with positron emission tomography.

    A.K.P. Jones;L.Y. Qi;T. Fujirawa;S.K. Luthra

  • Placebo conditioning and placebo analgesia modulate a common brain network during pain anticipation and perception

    Alison Watson;Wael El-Deredy;Gian Domenico Iannetti;Donna Lloyd

  • Reductions in co-contraction following neuromuscular re-education in people with knee osteoarthritis

    Stephen J. Preece;Richard K. Jones;Christopher A. Brown;Timothy W. Cacciatore

  • A new integrated behavioural intervention for knee osteoarthritis: development and pilot study.

    Stephen J. Preece;Nathan Brookes;Nathan Brookes;Anita E. Williams;Richard K. Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Wael El-Deredy
Wael El-Deredy Valparaiso University
Stuart W G Derbyshire
Stuart W G Derbyshire National University of Singapore
Vincent J. Cunningham
Vincent J. Cunningham University of Aberdeen
Terry Jones
Terry Jones University of California, Davis
Brent A. Vogt
Brent A. Vogt Boston University
Karl J. Friston
Karl J. Friston University College London
Richard J. Brown
Richard J. Brown University of Manchester
Victor W. Pike
Victor W. Pike National Institutes of Health
Rebecca Elliott
Rebecca Elliott University of Manchester
Irene Tracey
Irene Tracey University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Anthony K. P. Jones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles