World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrew F. Glew

Andrew F. Glew

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
6904
World Ranking
4166
National Ranking
1968

Andrew F. Glew publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew F. Glew sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 132 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Andrew F. Glew D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew F. Glew sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • Central processing unit
  • Programming language

His main research concerns Computer hardware, Operating system, Parallel computing, Embedded system and Code. His Computer hardware study frequently links to related topics such as Data type. His work on Virtual machine, Multiprocessing and Systems management as part of general Operating system study is frequently connected to System Management Mode, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Consistency, Signal, Pointer and Translation lookaside buffer in addition to Parallel computing. His Embedded system research incorporates elements of Load/store architecture, Key, Encryption and Code module. His Memory data register research focuses on subjects like Status register, which are linked to Arithmetic and Overflow flag.

His most cited work include:

  • Method for pipeline processing of instructions by controlling access to a reorder buffer using a register file outside the reorder buffer (197 citations)
  • Processor ordering consistency for a processor performing out-of-order instruction execution (190 citations)
  • System and method for protection against untrusted system management code by redirecting a system management interrupt and creating a virtual machine container (116 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Computer hardware, Operating system, Parallel computing, Microprocessor and Set. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Computer hardware, Storage area is strongly linked to Electronic circuit. Andrew F. Glew combines subjects such as Embedded system and Code with his study of Operating system.

His Parallel computing study which covers Pointer that intersects with Re-order buffer. His research in Microprocessor tackles topics such as Operand which are related to areas like Instructions per cycle. Andrew F. Glew studied Set and Instruction set that intersect with Control unit.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Computer hardware (38.46%)
  • Operating system (26.37%)
  • Parallel computing (18.13%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2009-2015)?

  • Computer network (6.59%)
  • Computer hardware (38.46%)
  • Computer security (4.40%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Andrew F. Glew focuses on Computer network, Computer hardware, Computer security, Information handling and Set. His study in the field of Storage area is also linked to topics like Basis. In general Computer security, his work in Intrusion detection system and Risk assessment is often linked to Function and Intrusion linking many areas of study.

His Set research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Value, Resource allocation and Process, Operations management. His Scheduling research includes themes of Database, Logical conjunction, Real-time computing, Simulation and Operations research. His work carried out in the field of Resource allocation brings together such families of science as AND gate, Data processing system, Resource scheduling and Executable.

Between 2009 and 2015, his most popular works were:

  • Invalidating translation lookaside buffer entries in a virtual machine (VM) system (63 citations)
  • Entitlement vector for managing resource allocation (50 citations)
  • Fine-grained security in federated data sets (44 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Operating system
  • Central processing unit
  • Programming language

His primary areas of study are Computer security, Computer network, Trap, Information handling and AND gate. His work in the fields of Computer security, such as Risk assessment and Intrusion detection system, intersects with other areas such as Intrusion, Function and Risk monitoring. His study in Trap is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Control flow, Control-flow integrity and Embedded system.

His study in Information handling intersects with areas of studies such as Thread, Entitlement, Object and Schedule. Andrew F. Glew interconnects Data processing system, Database, Process and Resource scheduling in the investigation of issues within AND gate. His study explores the link between Database and topics such as Resource allocation that cross with problems in Executable.

Best Publications

  • Pipeline process of instructions in a computer system

    Hinton Glenn J;Papworth David B;Glew Andrew F;Fetterman Michael A

  • Mechanism for efficiently overlapping multiple operand types in a microprocessor

    Andrew F. Glew;Darrell D. Boggs;Michael A. Fetterman;Glenn J. Hinton

  • Authenticated code method and apparatus

    Andrew Glew;James Ii Sutton;Lawrence Ii Smith;David Grawrock

  • METHOD AND DEVICE FOR EXECUTING FLOATING POINT INSTRUCTION AND PACK DATA INSTRUCTION BY USING SINGLE REGISTER FILE

    Lin Derrick;Vakkalagadda Romamohan R;Glew Andrew F;Mennemeier Larry M

  • System and method for protection against untrusted system management code by redirecting a system management interrupt and creating a virtual machine container

    James Sutton;David Grawrock;Richard Uhlig;David Poisner

  • Authenticated code module

    Andrew F. Glew;James A. Sutton;Lawrence O. Smith;David W. Grawrock

  • Method for performing data type operations on different register files that logically appear as single register file

    Doron Orenstein;Ramamohan R. Vakkalagadda;Andrew F. Glew;Larry M. Mennemeier

  • Entry allocation in a circular buffer using wrap bits indicating whether a queue of the circular buffer has been traversed

    David B. Papworth;Andrew F. Glew;Michael A. Fetterman;Glenn J. Hinton

  • Data processor with circuitry for handling pointers associated with a register exchange operation

    David W. Clift;James M. Arnold;Robert P. Colwell;Andrew F. Glew

  • Processor supporting execution of an authenticated code instruction

    Andrew Glew;James Sutton;Lawrence Smith;David Grawrock

  • Methods and systems to control virtual machines

    Steve M. Bennett;Gilbert Neiger;Erik C. Cota-Robles;Stalinselvaraj Jeyasingh

  • Method for executing different sets of instructions that cause a processor to perform different data type operations

    Adrew F Glew;Larry M Mennemeier;Alexander D Peleg;Carole Dulong

  • Flag renaming and flag masks within register alias table

    Robert P. Colwell;Andrew F. Glew;Atiq A. Bajwa;Glenn J. Hinton

  • Method and apparatus for handling speculative memory access operations

    Andrew F. Glew;Haitham Akkary

  • Method and apparatus for predicting, clearing and redirecting unpredicted changes in instruction flow in a microprocessor

    Robert P. Colwell;Atiq Bajwa;Michael A. Fetterman;Andrew F. Glew

  • Fault-tolerant boot strap mechanism for a multiprocessor system

    Milind Karnik;Joseph Batz;Keshavan Tiruvallur;Andrew Glew

  • Method and apparatus for processing memory-type information within a microprocessor

    Andrew F. Apartment Glew;Glenn J. Hinton

  • Position calibration device for controlling shifting grouped data

    Peleg Alexander D;Yaari Yaacov;Mittal Millind;Mennemeier Larry M

  • Out-of-order processor with a memory subsystem which handles speculatively dispatched load operations

    Jeffrey M. Abramson;David B. Papworth;Haitham H. Akkary;Andrew F. Glew

  • Method and apparatus for combining uncacheable write data into cache-line-sized write buffers

    Andy Glew;Nitin Sarangdhar;Mandar Joshi

Frequent Co-Authors

Glenn J. Hinton
Glenn J. Hinton Intel (United States)
David B. Papworth
David B. Papworth Intel (United States)
Gilbert Neiger
Gilbert Neiger Intel (United States)
Michael Kozuch
Michael Kozuch Intel (United States)
Clarence T. Tegreene
Clarence T. Tegreene Microsoft (United States)
Richard Uhlig
Richard Uhlig Intel (United States)
James P. Kardach
James P. Kardach FINsix Corporation
Roderick A. Hyde
Roderick A. Hyde Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Jordin T. Kare
Jordin T. Kare Microsoft (United States)
Victoria Y. H. Wood
Victoria Y. H. Wood Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open diverse career opportunities in technology. For those seeking to enter the workforce quickly, pursuing the fastest degree to get may be a practical option. These programs are designed to provide employable skills in a shorter time frame.

If you want to deepen your expertise, especially in trending fields like AI, consider one of the best online masters in AI. Such advanced degrees can help boost your competitive edge and open doors to specialized tech roles.

Choosing the right undergraduate pathway is equally important. Reviewing the best majors in college for computer science enthusiasts can help you make informed decisions based on your interests and the job market's needs.

For professionals balancing work and study, completing one of the short masters programs lets you fast-track your qualifications without a lengthy commitment. These options provide flexible study formats and focused curricula for quicker career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew F. Glew

Recently Published Articles