Data Sources and Bibliometric Collection
The 5th edition of the Research.com Best Ecology and Evolution Scientists in Korea Ranking is primarily based on comprehensive bibliometric data obtained from OpenAlex and CrossRef, complemented by multiple other reliable data sources. These databases are among the most prominent and widely recognized repositories in the global research community, ensuring that the data used is both extensive and authoritative. The bibliometric data for devising citation-based metrics that inform this ranking were collected on January 12, 2026. A scientist’s position in the ranking is determined by their D-index (Discipline H-index), a refined metric that exclusively includes publications and citation data pertinent to the specific discipline under examination, thereby providing a focused and accurate representation of scholarly impact within Ecology and Evolution.
Scope of Research and Ranking Criteria
The ranking process involved a meticulous examination of 279,971 scientist profiles identified from diverse bibliometric databases across all disciplines. Notably, 6 scientists specializing in Ecology and Evolution were identified and assessed with heightened scrutiny. To qualify for inclusion in the ranking, a scientist’s D-index had to be a minimum of 30, alongside a majority of their tier-one publications being directly related to Ecology and Evolution. Furthermore, the evaluation took into account notable awards and achievements within the field to reinforce the scholarly impact reflected in bibliometric measures.
The D-index threshold for selecting top researchers is calibrated in increments of 10, according to the estimated total number of scholars in each discipline, ensuring that approximately the top 1% of leading experts are incorporated into the list. An additional filter requires that the proximity between a scientist's overall H-index and their D-index not exceed 30%, ensuring consistency and relevance of impact within the discipline.
Additional Verification Procedures
The researchers responsible for this ranking recognize that raw bibliometric data alone cannot serve as an absolute measure for evaluating scholarly contributions. Hence, all included scientist profiles underwent a rigorous manual verification process. These profiles were cross-referenced against publications indexed in a wide range of trustworthy and reputable sources to confirm accuracy and authenticity.
While the number of publications in premier journals and conference proceedings does not directly affect a scientist’s ranking position, it serves as a valuable secondary indicator of their research contributions to the specific area of Ecology and Evolution. The ranking itself is established through each researcher’s D-index, derived from the robust data available via OpenAlex and CrossRef.
For a comprehensive understanding of the methodology underpinning this ranking, readers are encouraged to consult our methodology page.
Research.com’s Mission and Vision
At Research.com, our mission is to inspire researchers, corporate entities, and policymakers worldwide to scrutinize where leading scientific experts are advancing their work. We strive to provide the global scientific community with an authoritative resource to identify top experts in specific research domains, across countries, and within distinguished research institutions. Through careful and meticulous ranking methodologies, we aim to foster transparency, facilitate collaborations, and inform strategic decisions that support the advancement of science and innovation on a global scale.
