| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecology and Evolution | 723 | 10 | 11 | 3 |
Transactions of The Royal Society of South Australia mainly deals with areas of study such as Ecology, Zoology, Taxonomy (biology), Genus and Fishery. Ecology research discussed connects with the study of Helminths.
The published articles focus on Ecology, Zoology, Fishery, Taxonomy (biology) and Paleontology. The published articles focus on Ecology but sometimes tackle the closely related topic of Helminths which is concerned with Aquatic animal. The journal publications feature studies on Zoology, including topics such as Genus.
Transactions of The Royal Society of South Australia investigates areas of study like Zoology, Archaeology, Helminths, Ecology and Spirocercidae. In particular, the Zoology works presented emphasize discussions on Morphometrics. It connects the study in Archaeology with the closely related area of Haystack.
Topics in Helminths were tackled in line with various other fields like Wildlife, Lizard, Host (biology), Geographic distribution and Nematode. It covers various topics on Ecology such as Nutrient, Cosmopolitan distribution, Plant community, Typha domingensis and Ecological niche. Attendees of it participated in discussions that delve into both Spirocercidae and Chabertiidae.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Transactions of The Royal Society of South Australia (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Transactions of The Royal Society of South Australia (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 9.09% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 90.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 0.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 10.00% of all publications and 0.00% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Trevor H. Worthy;Jacqueline M. T. Nguyen
(2020)Gerrut Norval;Bruce Halliday;Robert D. Sharrad;Michael G. Gardner;Michael G. Gardner
(2021)Sentiko Ibalim;Scott V.C. Groom;James B. Dorey;Alejandro Velasco-Castrillon
(2020)Brock A. Hedges;Andy D. Austin;John G. Conran;Gary S. Taylor
(2021)J. Anderson;G. Keppel;S.-M. Thomson;J. Gibbs
(2020)Gerrut Norval;Charles R. Bursey;Stephen R. Goldberg;Robert D. Sharrad
(2021)Studying Ecology and Evolution offers a strong foundation for various career paths, especially those linked to environmental health and biological research. Graduates often look for flexible educational options to enhance their qualifications, making online programs an attractive choice. For those interested in health data related to ecological studies, exploring cahiim accredited health information management programs online can provide essential skills in managing health information systems aligned with environmental health data.
Moreover, many biology and ecology graduates consider entering healthcare fields. Programs like the easiest accelerated nursing programs to get into offer efficient pathways for those shifting their focus to nursing, catering to individuals seeking a swift entry into clinical roles.
For professionals aiming to specialize in medical coding within environmental health contexts or hospitals, understanding the distinctions between certifications is crucial. Evaluating the ccs vs cpc certifications can help candidates choose the best credential for their career goals and salary expectations.
Finally, advanced practice roles like family nurse practitioners are accessible through targeted online education. The fnp post master's certificate programs are especially valuable for those with a master's degree seeking to expand their clinical expertise quickly.
