| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genetics | 122 | 12 | 20 | 6 |
| Molecular Biology | 151 | 11 | 10 | 5 |
Genetics and Molecular Biology generally zeroes in on subjects such as Genetics, Gene, Botany, Molecular biology and Zoology. Genetics and Molecular Biology focuses on different Genetics studies like Allele, Genome, Chromosome, Karyotype and Genotype. In particular, the Allele works presented emphasize discussions on Microsatellite.
In it, Evolutionary biology, Heterochromatin and Ploidy are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Karyotype research. The journal concentrates on Gene topics that focus on Gene expression, Exon and Phylogenetic tree. It explores research in Zoology and the adjacent study of Ecology.
The most cited publications investigate areas of study like Genetics, Botany, Gene, Ecology and Genetic diversity. The studies on Botany discussed at the published papers can also contribute to research in the domains of RAPD, Abiotic stress and Horticulture. While the journal publications focused on Ecology, they were also able to explore topics like Zoology and Genetic structure.
The journal was organized to reinforce research efforts on Gene, Genetics, Pandemic, Disease and Phylogenetic tree. It investigates Gene research which frequently intersects with Computational biology. The Genetics research presented places emphasis on topics like Meiosis, Frameshift mutation, Exon, Genotyping and Exome sequencing.
Clinical significance, Virus, Breast cancer, Single-nucleotide polymorphism and In vivo are some topics wherein Disease research discussed in the journal have an impact. While Genetics and Molecular Biology focused on Phylogenetic tree, it was also able to explore topics like Evolutionary biology, Genome and Mitochondrial DNA. The studies on Mitochondrial DNA discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Zoology and Genetic diversity.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Genetics and Molecular Biology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Genetics and Molecular Biology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 10.47% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 50.65% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 15.58% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 2.60% of all publications and 31.17% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Namrata Kumar;Natalia C. Moreno;Bruno C. Feltes;Carlos F. M. Menck
(2020)Mayla Daiane Correa Molinari;Mayla Daiane Correa Molinari;Renata Fuganti-Pagliarini;Silvana Regina Rockenbach Marin;Silvana Regina Rockenbach Marin;Leonardo Cesar Ferreira
(2020)Gaia Roversi;Gaia Roversi;Elisa Adele Colombo;Ivana Magnani;Cristina Gervasini
(2021)Rafael Kretschmer;Rafael Kretschmer;Marcelo Santos de Souza;Suziane Alves Barcellos;Tiago Marafiga Degrandi
(2020)Alain Sarasin;Patrick Munier;François Cartault
(2020)Jeison Willy de Souza Magnabosco;Hugo Pacheco de Freitas Fraga;Raquel Santos da Silva;Marcelo Rogalski
(2020)Aureliano C Cunha;Renato Augusto Corrêa dos Santos;Diego Mauricio Riaño-Pachón;Fábio Márcio Squina
(2020)Camilla Bruno Di-Nizo;Malcolm Andrew Ferguson-Smith;Maria José de J Silva
(2020)For students interested in Ecology and Evolution, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities in healthcare and environmental management. Those looking to combine ecological knowledge with healthcare can consider an accredited online health information management degree cahiim. This path emphasizes data management crucial for environmental health studies and medical institutions.
Many biology graduates find accelerated nursing programs a practical gateway into patient-centered careers. The accelerated nursing programs offer a faster route to licensure, benefiting those passionate about community health and conservation medicine.
For professionals interested in the administrative aspects of health and environmental data, obtaining a medical coding certification can enhance employability in healthcare facilities that support ecological research and public health monitoring.
Additionally, for advanced practice nurses focused on integrating ecological awareness into clinical care, online fnp post master's certificate online programs provide specialized education to expand their scope of impact in underserved environments.
