World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
IEEE

Picture Coding Symposium (PCS)

Location: San Jose , United States

Submission deadline: 7/15/2022

Conference dates: 12/7/2022 - 12/9/2022

Research H-index
11

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Computer Science 352 34 72 10

Call for Papers

Topics
PCS 2022 invites you to submit work that pushes the boundaries of image and video coding. The following list contains some examples, but it is not an exhaustive list:

Image and video coding
Model-based and synthetic coding
Screen content coding
Multimodal coding and processing
Learning-based image and video coding
Compressed-domain image/video analysis
Datasets for learning-based visual coding and analysis
Image and video coding for machines
Multi-task image and video coding
Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality coding
360° and multi-view video processing and coding
Point cloud processing and coding
Light field processing and coding
Immersive and volumetric video
Representation, analysis and coding of 3D scenes
Emerging standards for visual data coding
Objective and subjective quality assessment
Transcoding and adaptive streaming
Optimized streaming methods
Real-time video communications
Error robustness, resilience and concealment
Low complexity video compression
Network-, edge- and cloud-based coding
Energy management in compression
Hardware architectures
Protection and integrity of visual data

Overview

This comprehensive ranking presents a detailed listing of scientific conferences in the field of Computer Science. Developed by Research.com, one of the leading platforms dedicated to science research across all major disciplines, this resource upholds a longstanding commitment to providing trusted, data-driven insights into scientific contributions since 2014.

Conference positions within this ranking are determined using a unique bibliometric score meticulously developed by Research.com. This score is calculated based on the estimated h-index and the number of leading scientists who have participated in each conference over the preceding three years. The presented Impact Score values were collected as of 2024-11-27, ensuring the data reflects the most up-to-date contributions and reputation within the discipline.

To construct this ranking, an extensive and rigorous evaluation process was conducted. More than 2,742 conferences were carefully selected following a detailed inspection and thorough examination of over 148,739 scientific documents published over the last three years. The analysis considered the scholarly output of 13,184 leading and highly respected scientists in the area of Computer Science, reflecting the depth and breadth of expertise underlying these assessments.

For readers seeking greater detail regarding the evaluation criteria and scoring methodology employed in establishing these rankings, comprehensive information is available on our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing at Picture Coding Symposium (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Wen Gao (23 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
  • Thomas Wiegand (20 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
  • Siwei Ma (19 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
  • Andre Kaup (13 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
  • Heiko Schwarz (12 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at Picture Coding Symposium (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Peking University (27 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
  • Heinrich Hertz Institute (21 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
  • Samsung (19 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (18 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • University of New South Wales (14 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 6 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2015 edition, 17.11% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 36.51% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 22.22% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 11.11% of all publications and 30.16% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online computer science degrees in the USA opens diverse opportunities while addressing practical concerns like affordability. Many students prioritize programs featured in computer science cost rankings to balance quality education with budget constraints.

For veterans transitioning to civilian careers, tailored options exist such as online cybersecurity degrees for veterans. These programs recognize unique needs and experiences, helping service members build in-demand skills in a flexible learning environment.

The rise of AI has also created new professional roles. Becoming an AI trainer involves understanding machine learning systems and guiding their development. Resources like ai trainer jobs provide insights into career paths and earning potential within this evolving field.

Meanwhile, the cybersecurity sector remains critical for digital safety. Many learners pursue credentials through cyber security course online offerings, which offer practical knowledge and certifications valued by employers across industries.

Best Scientists who published in this Conference

Related Articles

Recently Published Articles