nternational Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (ICAISC)

The ranking presented on this page provides a comprehensive evaluation of scientific conferences in the field of Computer Science. This ranking has been meticulously developed by Research.com, a leading authority in science research across all major domains, including Computer Science, and a trusted provider of scientific data since 2014.

The ranking utilizes a distinctive bibliometric score designed by Research.com, reflecting the rigorous standards upheld throughout its compilation. This score is calculated based on the estimated h-index as well as the number of leading scientists who have participated in each conference during the last three years. Such an approach ensures a robust and nuanced assessment, capturing both the impact and the scholarly presence associated with each event.

The Impact Score values included in this ranking were systematically collected as of 2024-11-27. The ranking process entailed an exhaustive review of over 2,742 conferences, selected following a detailed inspection and critical evaluation. This involved an in-depth analysis of more than 148,739 scientific documents published within the past three years by 13,184 prominent and respected scientists specializing in Computer Science.

The methodology underpinning this ranking demonstrates Research.com’s commitment to delivering transparent, objective, and accurate insights into the academic landscape. For a detailed explanation of the procedures and criteria used to compute the ranking scores, please refer to our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (based on the number of publications) are:

• Krzysztof Cpałka (26 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Rafał Scherer (24 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• Marcin Korytkowski (20 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• Marcin Gabryel (19 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• Krystian Łapa (17 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (based on the number of publications) are:

• Częstochowa University of Technology (157 papers) published 20 papers at the last edition, 7 less than at the previous edition,
• AGH University of Science and Technology (103 papers) published 26 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Wrocław University of Technology (73 papers) published 9 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
• Silesian University of Technology (47 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• Warsaw University of Technology (37 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2017 edition, 7.89% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 52.14% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 8.57% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 17.86% of all publications and 21.43% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.