IWAENC 2022 : International Workshop on Acoustic Signal Enhancement (IWAENC)

The scientific conference ranking presented on this page offers a comprehensive evaluation of conferences within the field of Electronics and Electrical Engineering. Developed by Research.com—a recognized leader in the science research domain since 2014—this ranking provides reliable and data-driven insights into scientific contributions and research impact.

Conference positions in the ranking are determined through a unique bibliometric score designed exclusively by Research.com. This score accounts for the estimated h-index as well as the number of distinguished scientists who have participated in each conference during the past three years. These multifaceted metrics ensure that the ranking reflects not only the conference’s historical influence but also its ability to attract leading contributors in Electronics and Electrical Engineering.

The Impact Score values featured in this ranking were meticulously gathered as of 2024-11-27, offering the latest and most accurate snapshot of conference standing in the field. The rigorous ranking process entailed the evaluation of over 2,204 conferences. These were chosen following an extensive review process which closely examined more than 95,378 scientific documents published over the preceding three years by 6,160 of the most prominent and respected scientists in the area.

This exhaustive and systematic approach underscores the commitment to impartial and high-quality assessment, ensuring that this ranking serves as a trusted resource for researchers, academics, and institutional decision-makers. For those interested in a deeper understanding of the methodologies and calculations behind these rankings, comprehensive information can be found on our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at International Workshop on Acoustic Signal Enhancement (based on the number of publications) are:

• Simon Doclo (18 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• Emanuel A. P. Habets (16 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• Sharon Gannot (14 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• Patrick A. Naylor (13 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• Nobutaka Ono (11 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 5 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at International Workshop on Acoustic Signal Enhancement (based on the number of publications) are:

• University of Oldenburg (21 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Bar-Ilan University (14 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
• University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (14 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition,
• Nippon Telegraph and Telephone (13 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Imperial College London (13 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2018 edition, 7.02% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 34.91% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 19.81% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 24.53% of all publications and 20.75% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.