CW 2026 — International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW)

The Computer Science Conference Ranking presented on this page offers an authoritative evaluation of scientific conferences within the field of Computer Science. Compiled by Research.com, a leading platform for science research across all major fields including Computer Science, the ranking leverages a wealth of trusted scientific data and contributions collected since 2014.

The ranking positions are determined using a distinct bibliometric score, meticulously developed by the Research.com team. This score is computed from a combination of the estimated h-index and the number of leading scientists who have presented at each conference over the preceding three years. This rigorous approach ensures a comprehensive and impartial assessment of academic impact and leadership within the field.

The Impact Score values featured in this ranking were compiled as of 2024-11-27, ensuring that the data reflects current trends and the most recent advancements in Computer Science research. The evaluation process encompassed a detailed inspection and systematic analysis of over 2742 conferences, selected following a thorough review of more than 148,739 scientific documents published over the past three years by 13,184 distinguished and widely recognized scientists in the discipline.

This rigorous, data-driven methodology highlights the depth of research and expertise applied by the Research.com team, guaranteeing a reliable and unbiased ranking for the academic community. For a detailed explanation of the methodology behind our conference ranking and the computation of bibliometric scores, please refer to our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at Cyberworlds (based on the number of publications) are:

• Olga Sourina (19 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Alexei Sourin (17 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Hassan Ugail (13 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition,
• Stanislav Klimenko (11 papers) absent at the last edition,
• En-hui Yang (10 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at Cyberworlds (based on the number of publications) are:

• Nanyang Technological University (67 papers) published 20 papers at the last edition, 14 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Waterloo (36 papers) absent at the last edition,
• University of Bradford (33 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition,
• University of Toronto (25 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Queen's University (21 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2018 edition, 17.11% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 36.51% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 6.35% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 20.63% of all publications and 36.51% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.