World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 40 2077 1929 5 4 158 4597

Zoran Ren publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Zoran Ren between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Zoran Ren published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2007. 8 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2007. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications
1970 2025

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Zoran Ren: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 2
1998 3
1999 3
2000 0
2001 2
2002 6
2003 1
2004 4
2005 4
2006 4
2007 15
2008 11
2009 8
2010 2
2011 5
2012 4
2013 4
2014 3
2015 6
2016 11
2017 5
2018 13
2019 11
2020 15
2021 11
2022 10
2023 5
2024 5
2025 3
Total 177
Download as CSV

Zoran Ren publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zoran Ren sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 157–166 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 158 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132 158
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Zoran Ren D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zoran Ren sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104 40
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Auxetic Cellular Materials - a Review

    Nejc Novak;Matej Vesenjak;Zoran Ren

  • Quasi-static and dynamic compressive behaviour of sheet TPMS cellular structures

    Nejc Novak;Oraib Al-Ketan;Lovre Krstulović-Opara;Reza Rowshan

  • Blast response study of the sandwich composite panels with 3D chiral auxetic core

    Nejc Novak;Luka Starčevič;Matej Vesenjak;Zoran Ren

  • Simulation of crash tests for high containment levels of road safety barriers

    M. Borovinšek;M. Vesenjak;M. Ulbin;Z. Ren

  • Static and dynamic axial crush performance of in-situ foam-filled tubes

    Isabel Duarte;Matej Vesenjak;Lovre Krstulović-Opara;Zoran Ren

  • Computational and experimental crash analysis of the road safety barrier

    Zoran Ren;Matej Vesenjak

  • Development of novel hybrid TPMS cellular lattices and their mechanical characterisation

    Nejc Novak;Oraib Al-Ketan;Matej Borovinšek;Lovre Krstulović-Opara

  • Compressive behaviour of chiral auxetic cellular structures at different strain rates

    Nejc Novak;Matej Vesenjak;Shigeru Tanaka;Kazuyuki Hokamoto

  • Impact and blast resistance of uniform and graded sandwich panels with TPMS cellular structures

    Unknown

  • Mechanical properties of hybrid metamaterial with auxetic chiral cellular structure and silicon filler

    Nejc Novak;Lovre Krstulović-Opara;Zoran Ren;Matej Vesenjak

  • Compression and shear behaviour of graded chiral auxetic structures

    Nejc Novak;Lovre Krstulović-Opara;Zoran Ren;Matej Vesenjak

  • A NEW MODEL FOR THE NUMERICAL DETERMINATION OF PITTING RESISTANCE OF GEAR TEETH FLANKS

    Unknown

  • Surface fatigue of gear teeth flanks

    Unknown

  • Cell shape effect evaluation of polyamide cellular structures

    Matej Vesenjak;Lovre Krstulović-Opara;Zoran Ren;Željko Domazet

  • Mechanical characterisation of auxetic cellular structures built from inverted tetrapods

    Nejc Novak;Matej Vesenjak;Lovre Krstulović-Opara;Zoran Ren

  • Mechanical behaviour of auxetic cellular structures built from inverted tetrapods at high strain rates

    Nejc Novak;Kazuyuki Hokamoto;Matej Vesenjak;Zoran Ren

  • Crush performance of multifunctional hybrid foams based on an aluminium alloy open-cell foam skeleton

    Isabel Duarte;Matej Vesenjak;Lovre Krstulović-Opara;Zoran Ren

  • Bending Performance Evaluation of Aluminium Alloy Tubes Filled with Different Cellular Metal Cores

    Matej Vesenjak;Isabel Duarte;Joachim Baumeister;Hartmut Göhler

  • Experimental Study of Open-Cell Cellular Structures with Elastic Filler Material

    Matej Vesenjak;Lovre Krstulović-Opara;Zoran Ren;Andreas Öchsner

  • Shear modulus of conventional and auxetic open-cell foam

    Nejc Novak;Olly Duncan;Olly Duncan;Tom Allen;Andrew Alderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Matej Vesenjak
Matej Vesenjak University of Maribor
Hideo Nakajima
Hideo Nakajima Osaka University
Carolin Körner
Carolin Körner University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Andrew Alderson
Andrew Alderson Sheffield Hallam University
Naresh Thadhani
Naresh Thadhani Georgia Institute of Technology
Rashid K. Abu Al-Rub
Rashid K. Abu Al-Rub Khalifa University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can be a great way to complement a Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering background. For those interested in working closely with people, various types of therapy degrees offer diverse opportunities to specialize in mental health and support services. These programs provide practical skills that can enhance teamwork and leadership in engineering projects.

Many students seek programs that balance quality and accessibility. Identifying the easy to get counseling degree options can help streamline education while maintaining relevant credentials, making it possible to shift career focus or expand professional skill sets with less time and financial investment.

For professionals aiming to accelerate their education, fast-paced options like the bcba accelerated program provide a pathway to earning credentials quickly. This is especially useful for engineers interested in behavior analysis or human factors in design, where understanding behavior improves product usability and safety.

When considering graduate studies, it’s important to understand admissions challenges. Resources explaining how hard it is to get into slp grad school highlight valuable insights into application competitiveness, which can also apply to stringent engineering graduate programs. Being informed helps candidates prepare stronger applications and select the right program.

Best Scientists Citing Zoran Ren

Recently Published Articles