World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
40
Citations
4597
World Ranking
2077
National Ranking
5

Zoran Ren publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zoran Ren sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 158 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Zoran Ren D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zoran Ren sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Auxetic Cellular Materials - a Review

    Nejc Novak;Matej Vesenjak;Zoran Ren

  • Quasi-static and dynamic compressive behaviour of sheet TPMS cellular structures

    Nejc Novak;Oraib Al-Ketan;Lovre Krstulović-Opara;Reza Rowshan

  • Blast response study of the sandwich composite panels with 3D chiral auxetic core

    Nejc Novak;Luka Starčevič;Matej Vesenjak;Zoran Ren

  • Simulation of crash tests for high containment levels of road safety barriers

    M. Borovinšek;M. Vesenjak;M. Ulbin;Z. Ren

  • Static and dynamic axial crush performance of in-situ foam-filled tubes

    Isabel Duarte;Matej Vesenjak;Lovre Krstulović-Opara;Zoran Ren

  • Computational and experimental crash analysis of the road safety barrier

    Zoran Ren;Matej Vesenjak

  • Development of novel hybrid TPMS cellular lattices and their mechanical characterisation

    Nejc Novak;Oraib Al-Ketan;Matej Borovinšek;Lovre Krstulović-Opara

  • Compressive behaviour of chiral auxetic cellular structures at different strain rates

    Nejc Novak;Matej Vesenjak;Shigeru Tanaka;Kazuyuki Hokamoto

  • Impact and blast resistance of uniform and graded sandwich panels with TPMS cellular structures

    Unknown

  • Mechanical properties of hybrid metamaterial with auxetic chiral cellular structure and silicon filler

    Nejc Novak;Lovre Krstulović-Opara;Zoran Ren;Matej Vesenjak

  • Compression and shear behaviour of graded chiral auxetic structures

    Nejc Novak;Lovre Krstulović-Opara;Zoran Ren;Matej Vesenjak

  • A NEW MODEL FOR THE NUMERICAL DETERMINATION OF PITTING RESISTANCE OF GEAR TEETH FLANKS

    Unknown

  • Surface fatigue of gear teeth flanks

    Unknown

  • Cell shape effect evaluation of polyamide cellular structures

    Matej Vesenjak;Lovre Krstulović-Opara;Zoran Ren;Željko Domazet

  • Mechanical characterisation of auxetic cellular structures built from inverted tetrapods

    Nejc Novak;Matej Vesenjak;Lovre Krstulović-Opara;Zoran Ren

  • Mechanical behaviour of auxetic cellular structures built from inverted tetrapods at high strain rates

    Nejc Novak;Kazuyuki Hokamoto;Matej Vesenjak;Zoran Ren

  • Crush performance of multifunctional hybrid foams based on an aluminium alloy open-cell foam skeleton

    Isabel Duarte;Matej Vesenjak;Lovre Krstulović-Opara;Zoran Ren

  • Bending Performance Evaluation of Aluminium Alloy Tubes Filled with Different Cellular Metal Cores

    Matej Vesenjak;Isabel Duarte;Joachim Baumeister;Hartmut Göhler

  • Experimental Study of Open-Cell Cellular Structures with Elastic Filler Material

    Matej Vesenjak;Lovre Krstulović-Opara;Zoran Ren;Andreas Öchsner

  • Shear modulus of conventional and auxetic open-cell foam

    Nejc Novak;Olly Duncan;Olly Duncan;Tom Allen;Andrew Alderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Matej Vesenjak
Matej Vesenjak University of Maribor
Hideo Nakajima
Hideo Nakajima Osaka University
Carolin Körner
Carolin Körner University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Andrew Alderson
Andrew Alderson Sheffield Hallam University
Naresh Thadhani
Naresh Thadhani Georgia Institute of Technology
Rashid K. Abu Al-Rub
Rashid K. Abu Al-Rub Khalifa University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can be a great way to complement a Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering background. For those interested in working closely with people, various types of therapy degrees offer diverse opportunities to specialize in mental health and support services. These programs provide practical skills that can enhance teamwork and leadership in engineering projects.

Many students seek programs that balance quality and accessibility. Identifying the easy to get counseling degree options can help streamline education while maintaining relevant credentials, making it possible to shift career focus or expand professional skill sets with less time and financial investment.

For professionals aiming to accelerate their education, fast-paced options like the bcba accelerated program provide a pathway to earning credentials quickly. This is especially useful for engineers interested in behavior analysis or human factors in design, where understanding behavior improves product usability and safety.

When considering graduate studies, it’s important to understand admissions challenges. Resources explaining how hard it is to get into slp grad school highlight valuable insights into application competitiveness, which can also apply to stringent engineering graduate programs. Being informed helps candidates prepare stronger applications and select the right program.

Best Scientists Citing Zoran Ren

Recently Published Articles