World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
43
Citations
7092
World Ranking
4957
National Ranking
355

Wlodek Kofman publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wlodek Kofman sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 329 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Wlodek Kofman D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wlodek Kofman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wlodek Kofman is affiliated with Grenoble Alpes University in France, where their research primarily focuses on physics and astronomy as well as engineering disciplines. Their work spans multiple subfields including astronomy and astrophysics, aerospace engineering, ocean engineering, geophysics, and biomedical engineering.

The main topics addressed in their research include planetary science and exploration, astro and planetary science, geophysical methods and applications, microwave imaging and scattering analysis, spacecraft design and technology, space science and extraterrestrial life, and seismic imaging and inversion techniques.

Recent publications by Wlodek Kofman highlight a diverse range of studies relevant to planetary science and remote sensing. Notable papers include:

  • Multi-temporal phenological indices derived from time series Sentinel-1 images to country-wide crop classification, 2022, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
  • Geophysical Characterization of the Interiors of Ganymede, Callisto and Europa by ESA's JUpiter ICy moons Explorer, 2024, Space Science Reviews
  • The Global Search for Liquid Water on Mars from Orbit: Current and Future Perspectives, 2020, Life
  • Radar for Europa Assessment and Sounding: Ocean to Near-Surface (REASON), 2024, Space Science Reviews
  • The Basal Detectability of an Ice-Covered Mars by MARSIS, 2022, Geophysical Research Letters

The venues where Kofman frequently publishes include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Space Science Reviews
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Remote Sensing

Collaborations have been an important aspect of Kofman's research activity, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Alain Hèrique
  • G. G. Ori
  • Antonio Genova
  • O. Mousis
  • Wenzhe Fa

Their body of work contributes to expanding knowledge in planetary exploration and geophysical analysis of celestial bodies, using a variety of remote sensing techniques and spacecraft instrumentation. This research aligns closely with advancing understanding of planetary interiors, surface characteristics, and potential biomarkers such as water presence on Mars and Jovian moons.

Best Publications

  • Radar Soundings of the Subsurface of Mars

    Giovanni Picardi;Jeffrey J. Plaut;Daniela Biccari;Ornella Bombaci

  • Subsurface radar sounding of the south polar layered deposits of Mars.

    Jeffrey J. Plaut;Giovanni Picardi;Ali Safaeinili;Anton B. Ivanov

  • The landing(s) of Philae and inferences about comet surface mechanical properties

    Jens Biele;Stephan Ulamec;Michael Maibaum;Reinhard Roll

  • Properties of the 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko interior revealed by CONSERT radar

    Wlodek Kofman;Alain Herique;Yves Barbin;Jean Pierre Barriot

  • The Cluster Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Field Fluctuations (STAFF) Experiment

    N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin;P. Chauveau;S. Louis;A. Meyer

  • The Mars express MARSIS sounder instrument

    R. Jordan;G. Picardi;J. Plaut;K. Wheeler

  • North polar deposits of Mars: Extreme purity of the water ice

    Cyril Grima;Wlodek Kofman;Jérémie Mouginot;Roger J. Phillips

  • The Comet Nucleus Sounding Experiment by Radiowave Transmission (CONSERT): A Short Description of the Instrument and of the Commissioning Stages

    Wlodek Kofman;Alain Hérique;Jean-Pierre Goutail;Tor Hagfors

  • Dielectric map of the Martian northern hemisphere and the nature of plain filling materials

    Jérémie Mouginot;Jérémie Mouginot;Antoine Pommerol;Antoine Pommerol;Pierre Beck;Wlodek Kofman

  • Estimation of the Total Electron Content of the Martian Ionosphere using Radar Sounder Surface Echoes

    Ali Safaeinili;Wlodek Kofman;Jérémie Mouginot;Yonggyu Gim

  • Accumulation and erosion of Mars' south polar layered deposits.

    Roberto Seu;Roger J. Phillips;Giovanni Alberti;Daniela Biccari

  • TandEM: Titan and Enceladus mission

    Athena Coustenis;Sushil K. Atreya;T. Balint;R.H. Brown

  • Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionospheric Sounding (MARSIS) after nine years of operation: A summary

    R. Orosei;R. L. Jordan;D. D. Morgan;M. Cartacci

  • Radar signal simulation: Surface modeling with the Facet Method

    J.-F. Nouvel;A. Herique;W. Kofman;A. Safaeinili

  • Elevated Electron Temperatures in the Auroral E Layer Measured With the Chatanika Radar

    Vincent B. Wickwar;Chantal Lathuillere;Wlodek Kofman;Gerard Lejeune

  • Impact of Mars ionosphere on orbital radar sounder operation and data processing

    A. Safaeinili;W. Kofman;J. F. Nouvel;A. Herique

  • The 3-5 MHz global reflectivity map of Mars by MARSIS/Mars Express: implications for the current inventory of subsurface H2O

    J. Mouginot;J. Mouginot;Antoine Pommerol;Antoine Pommerol;W. Kofman;P. Beck

  • RIME: Radar for Icy Moon Exploration

    L. Bruzzone;J. J. Plaut;G. Alberti;D. D. Blankenship

  • Comet nucleus sounding experiment by radiowave transmission

    W. Kofman;Y. Barbin;J. Klinger;A.-C. Levasseur-Regourd

  • Correction of the ionospheric distortion on the MARSIS surface sounding echoes

    J. Mouginot;W. Kofman;A. Safaeinili;A. Herique

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeremie Mouginot
Jeremie Mouginot Grenoble Alpes University
Roberto Orosei
Roberto Orosei National Institute for Astrophysics
Stephen M. Clifford
Stephen M. Clifford Planetary Science Institute
Pierre Beck
Pierre Beck Grenoble Alpes University
Giovanni Picardi
Giovanni Picardi Sapienza University of Rome
Jeffrey J. Plaut
Jeffrey J. Plaut Jet Propulsion Lab
Erling Nielsen
Erling Nielsen Max Planck Society
Olivier Witasse
Olivier Witasse European Space Research and Technology Centre
Lorenzo Bruzzone
Lorenzo Bruzzone University of Trento
Hans Nilsson
Hans Nilsson Swedish Institute of Space Physics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA can open doors to diverse career pathways beyond traditional geology roles. Many students explore interdisciplinary fields that enhance their skill set and marketability. For instance, pursuing an online masters in human resource management can complement technical expertise with leadership and organizational skills, preparing graduates for management positions within scientific organizations.

For mature students or those returning to education later in life, exploring options such as one year degree for seniors programs allows for swift credential upgrades or career changes without extensive time commitments. This flexibility is particularly valuable for Earth Science professionals seeking to specialize or pivot careers efficiently.

Additionally, some Earth Science graduates consider expanding into information sciences. Degrees from ala accredited schools provide high-quality training in managing scientific data, archives, and libraries. The question often arises whether is a masters in library science worth it, especially when it enhances access to critical research and environmental data, making this a strategic choice for science information management careers.

Best Scientists Citing Wlodek Kofman

Trending Scientists