World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
32
Citations
3844
World Ranking
3179
National Ranking
1081

W. M. Roquemore publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. M. Roquemore sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 145 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

W. M. Roquemore D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. M. Roquemore sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Overview of the National Jet Fuels Combustion Program

    Unknown

  • Characteristics of a Trapped-Vortex Combustor

    Unknown

  • Numerical investigations of transitional H2/N2 jet diffusion flames

    Unknown

  • Buoyant diffusion flames

    Unknown

  • Effect of nonunity Lewis number and finite-rate chemistry on the dynamics of a hydrogen-air jet diffusion flame☆

    Unknown

  • Performance of a trapped-vortex combustor

    Unknown

  • Role of inner and outer structures in transitional jet diffusion flame

    Unknown

  • Study on Trapped-Vortex Combustor-Effect of Injection on Flow Dynamics

    Viswanath R. Katta;W. M. Roquemore

  • Effect of increasing channel width on the structure of rotating detonation wave

    Viswanath R. Katta;Kevin Y. Cho;John L. Hoke;Joshua R. Codoni

  • Preliminary results of a numerical-experimental study of the dynamic structure of a buoyant jet diffusion flame

    Unknown

  • Interaction of a vortex with a flat flame formed between opposing jets of hydrogen and air

    V.R. Katta;C.D. Carter;G.J. Fiechtner;W.M. Roquemore

  • Role of flow visualization in the development of UNICORN

    Unknown

  • A study of a bluff-body combustor using laser sheet lighting

    Unknown

  • Calculation of Multidimensional Flames Using Large Chemical Kinetics

    Viswanath R. Katta;William M. Roquemore

  • Vortex combustor concept for gas turbine engines

    W. Roquemore;Dale Shouse;Dave Burrus;Art Johnson

  • Performance Assessment of a Prototype Trapped Vortex Combustor Concept for Gas Turbine Application

    Unknown

  • Impact of soot on flame flicker

    Viswanath R. Katta;William M. Roquemore;Arvind Menon;Seong Young Lee

  • Simulation of Dynamic Methane Jet Diffusion Flames Using Finite Rate Chemistry Models

    Viswanath R. Katta;W. M. Roquemore

  • Emissions Reduction Technologies for Military Gas Turbine Engines

    Unknown

  • Dynamics of an inverse diffusion flame and its role in polycyclic-aromatic-hydrocarbon and soot formation

    Viswanath R. Katta;Linda G. Blevins;William M. Roquemore

Frequent Co-Authors

Surya Pratap Vanka
Surya Pratap Vanka University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering can open doors to diverse career paths. For example, understanding how competitive programs can be is key. If you’re curious about program selectivity, insights on how hard is it to get into speech pathology grad school can offer a useful comparison for engineering fields.

Finding the right program is essential, especially when considering admission chances. Resources highlighting the easiest slp grad schools to get into emphasize the value of selecting schools that match your profile, balancing acceptance rates and academic rigor.

Cost is another major factor; understanding tuition and fees can help you plan financially. For detailed financial planning, the guide on online speech pathology degree costs and fees provides a clear breakdown, applicable when evaluating various STEM and engineering online programs.

Veterans looking to transition into engineering fields through education will appreciate the focus on supportive environments. Information on veteran friendly online speech pathology degree programs highlights important considerations for those seeking veteran-friendly academic pathways, relevant across many disciplines including engineering.

Best Scientists Citing W. M. Roquemore

Recently Published Articles