World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
45
Citations
5339
World Ranking
1516
National Ranking
15

V. Vijayakumar publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where V. Vijayakumar sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 227 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

V. Vijayakumar D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where V. Vijayakumar sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Controllability for fractional evolution inclusions without compactness

    Yong Zhou;V. Vijayakumar;R. Murugesu

  • Computational frame work of Cattaneo-Christov heat flux effects on Engine Oil based Williamson hybrid nanofluids: A thermal case study

    Wasim Jamshed;Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar;Rabha W. Ibrahim;Tayyaba Mukhtar

  • A note concerning to approximate controllability of Atangana-Baleanu fractional neutral stochastic systems with infinite delay

    Unknown

  • Results on controllability of Hilfer fractional differential equations with infinite delay via measures of noncompactness

    K. Kavitha;V. Vijayakumar;R. Udhayakumar;C. Ravichandran

  • A Note on Approximate Controllability of Fractional Semilinear Integrodifferential Control Systems via Resolvent Operators

    Unknown

  • A discussion on approximate controllability of Sobolev-type Hilfer neutral fractional stochastic differential inclusions

    C. Dineshkumar;Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar;R. Udhayakumar;V. Vijayakumar

  • Results on approximate controllability of Sobolev-type fractional neutral differential inclusions of Clarke subdifferential type

    K. Kavitha;V. Vijayakumar;Anurag Shukla;Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar

  • Results on controllability of Hilfer fractional neutral differential equations with infinite delay via measures of noncompactness

    K. Kavitha;V. Vijayakumar;R. Udhayakumar

  • A discussion on the approximate controllability of Hilfer fractional neutral stochastic integro-differential systems

    C. Dineshkumar;R. Udhayakumar;V. Vijayakumar;Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar

  • Results on the existence of Hilfer fractional neutral evolution equations with infinite delay via measures of noncompactness

    K. Kavitha;V. Vijayakumar;R. Udhayakumar;Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar

  • Asymptotic stability of fractional order (1,2] stochastic delay differential equations in Banach spaces

    Unknown

  • Results on approximate controllability for non-densely defined Hilfer fractional differential system with infinite delay

    V. Vijayakumar;R. Udhayakumar

  • A note on approximate controllability of the Hilfer fractional neutral differential inclusions with infinite delay

    K. Kavitha;V. Vijayakumar;R. Udhayakumar;N. Sakthivel

  • A note on the approximate controllability of Sobolev type fractional stochastic integro-differential delay inclusions with order 1<r<2

    C. Dineshkumar;R. Udhayakumar;V. Vijayakumar;Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar

  • Results concerning to approximate controllability of non‐densely defined Sobolev‐type Hilfer fractional neutral delay differential system

    Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar;V. Vijayakumar

  • Approximate Controllability of Second-Order Evolution Differential Inclusions in Hilbert Spaces

    N. I. Mahmudov;V. Vijayakumar;R. Murugesu

  • Approximate controllability for a class of fractional neutral integro-differential inclusions with state-dependent delay

    Velusamy Vijayakumar;C. Ravichandran;R Murugesu

  • Features of entropy optimization on viscous second grade nanofluid streamed with thermal radiation: A Tiwari and Das model

    Wasim Jamshed;S.R. Mishra;P.K. Pattnaik;Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar

  • A new study on existence and uniqueness of nonlocal fractional delay differential systems of order 1 < r < 2 in Banach spaces

    W. Kavitha Williams;V. Vijayakumar;R. Udhayakumar;Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar

  • Results on approximate controllability results for second‐order Sobolev‐type impulsive neutral differential evolution inclusions with infinite delay

    V. Vijayakumar;Sumati Kumari Panda;Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar;Haci Mehmet Baskonus

Frequent Co-Authors

Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar
Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
Sivanandam Sivasankaran
Sivanandam Sivasankaran King Abdulaziz University
Nazim I. Mahmudov
Nazim I. Mahmudov Eastern Mediterranean University
Haci Mehmet Baskonus
Haci Mehmet Baskonus Harran University
Juan J. Trujillo
Juan J. Trujillo University of La Laguna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, expanding your skill set with complementary online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals combine their quantitative background with business acumen through programs like the fastest mba programs online, which offer accelerated paths to leadership roles in finance, consulting, and tech industries.

Another popular option is pursuing a masters degree in marketing. This degree complements mathematical expertise by enhancing analytical skills focused on market research, consumer data analysis, and digital strategy, making graduates highly competitive in the evolving marketing landscape.

If timing and cost are concerns, you might consider cheapest 1 year online mba programs, which combine affordability with efficiency. These programs allow math graduates to quickly transition into business management roles without interrupting their career momentum.

For students with prior credits or coursework, exploring options like an online mba with transfer credits accepted can reduce both the cost and duration of study. This flexibility is ideal for professionals balancing work, study, and career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing V. Vijayakumar

Recently Published Articles