What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Mineral
- Igneous rock
- Basalt
His primary areas of study are Mineralogy, Rutile, Trace element, Geochemistry and Eclogite.
His work on Electron microprobe, Ilmenite and Geological materials as part of general Mineralogy study is frequently linked to Relative shift, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His research in Rutile intersects with topics in Metamorphic rock and Provenance.
Thomas Zack has researched Trace element in several fields, including Isotope dilution and Microanalysis.
His Geochemistry research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Amphibole and Pluton.
His Eclogite study incorporates themes from Permian, Isotope fractionation, Craton and Protolith.
His most cited work include:
- MPI-DING reference glasses for in situ microanalysis: New reference values for element concentrations and isotope ratios (743 citations)
- Temperature dependence of Zr in rutile: empirical calibration of a rutile thermometer (350 citations)
- Trace element abundances in rutiles from eclogites and associated garnet mica schists (244 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Thomas Zack mostly deals with Geochemistry, Mineralogy, Rutile, Trace element and Metamorphic rock.
The study of Geochemistry is intertwined with the study of Eclogite in a number of ways.
His work on Electron microprobe and Ilmenite as part of his general Mineralogy study is frequently connected to Partition coefficient, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.
His Rutile research incorporates elements of Quartz, Titanite, Provenance and Analytical chemistry.
The Trace element study which covers Microanalysis that intersects with Isotope dilution.
The concepts of his Metamorphic rock study are interwoven with issues in Granulite and Petrography.
He most often published in these fields:
- Geochemistry (52.10%)
- Mineralogy (42.02%)
- Rutile (34.45%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Geochemistry (52.10%)
- Geochronology (9.24%)
- Rutile (34.45%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Geochemistry, Geochronology, Rutile, Mineralogy and Oceanography.
In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Geochemistry, Mineral resource classification, Isotopes of oxygen, Matrix and Eclogite is strongly linked to δ18O.
His Geochronology study combines topics in areas such as Greenstone belt, Radiometric dating, Mafic and Zircon.
His Rutile research focuses on Provenance and how it relates to Ivrea zone.
His Mineralogy study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Mineral, Mass fraction and Tectonophysics.
His work in Massif addresses subjects such as Lithology, which are connected to disciplines such as Metamorphic rock.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Petrology and Geochronology of Rutile (51 citations)
- Laser ablation Rb/Sr dating by online chemical separation of Rb and Sr in an oxygen-filled reaction cell (39 citations)
- Isotopic evidence for microbial production and consumption of methane in the upper continental crust throughout the Phanerozoic eon (26 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Mineral
- Igneous rock
- Basalt
His main research concerns Geochemistry, Geochronology, Mineralogy, Mafic and Radiometric dating.
His work is dedicated to discovering how Geochronology, Zircon are connected with Archean, Rubidium-strontium dating and Isochron dating and other disciplines.
His research brings together the fields of Rutile and Mineralogy.
His biological study deals with issues like Polyatomic ion, which deal with fields such as Quartz.
The various areas that Thomas Zack examines in his Mafic study include Mineral, Quartz-porphyry, Craton, Basalt and Terrane.
The Radiometric dating study combines topics in areas such as Muscovite, Argon–argon dating, Biotite and Calcite.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
