World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Thomas Zack publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Zack sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Thomas Zack D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Zack sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Zack is affiliated with the University of Gothenburg in Sweden and primarily works within the domain of Earth and Planetary Sciences, contributing extensively to research in this field.

Their research spans several subfields, including:

  • Geophysics
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Paleontology

Key topics covered in their work include:

  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Earthquake and Tectonic Studies
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • High-Pressure Geophysics and Materials
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
  • Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

Thomas Zack has published numerous papers, with recent examples that reflect their range of interests and expertise:

  • Assessment of elemental fractionation and matrix effects during in situ Rb-Sr dating of phlogopite by LA-ICP-MS/MS: implications for the accuracy and precision of mineral ages, 2020, Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
  • In situ Rb-Sr dating of slickenfibres in deep crystalline basement faults, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • LA-ICP-MS/MS Single-Spot Rb-Sr Dating, 2021, Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
  • Impact of green clay authigenesis on element sequestration in marine settings, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Coupled U-Pb and Rb-Sr laser ablation geochronology trace Archean to Proterozoic crustal evolution in the Dharwar Craton, India, 2020, Precambrian Research

Their publications frequently appear in specific venues such as:

  • Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
  • Goldschmidt2021 abstracts
  • Journal of Metamorphic Geology
  • International Journal of Earth Sciences
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America

Thomas Zack collaborates regularly with several coauthors, with whom they have co-published multiple works. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Juraj Farkaš
  • Stefan Löhr
  • Sarah Gilbert
  • Andre Baldermann
  • Ahmad Redaa

Best Publications

  • MPI-DING reference glasses for in situ microanalysis: New reference values for element concentrations and isotope ratios

    Klaus Peter Jochum;Brigitte Stoll;Kirstin Herwig;Matthias Willbold

  • Temperature dependence of Zr in rutile: empirical calibration of a rutile thermometer

    T. Zack;R. Moraes;A. Kronz

  • Trace element abundances in rutiles from eclogites and associated garnet mica schists

    T Zack;T Zack;A Kronz;S.F Foley;T Rivers

  • Rutile geochemistry and its potential use in quantitative provenance studies

    T. Zack;T. Zack;H. von Eynatten;A. Kronz

  • The partitioning of trace elements between ilmenite, ulvospinel, armalcolite and silicate melts with implications for the early differentiation of the moon

    Stephan Klemme;Detlef Günther;Kathrin Hametner;Stefan Prowatke

  • Carboniferous high-potassium I-type granitoid magmatism in the Eastern Pontides: The Gümüşhane pluton (NE Turkey)

    Gueltekin Topuz;Rainer Altherr;Wolfgang Siebel;Winfried H. Schwarz

  • Rutile crystals as potential trace element and isotope mineral standards for microanalysis

    G. L. Luvizotto;T. Zack;H. P. Meyer;T. Ludwig

  • Extremely light Li in orogenic eclogites: The role of isotope fractionation during dehydration in subducted oceanic crust

    Thomas Zack;Paul B. Tomascak;Roberta L. Rudnick;Claude Dalpé

  • In situ U–Pb rutile dating by LA-ICP-MS: 208Pb correction and prospects for geological applications

    Thomas Zack;Daniel F. Stockli;George L. Luvizotto;Matthias G. Barth

  • Mineral ages and P-T conditions of Late Paleozoic high-pressure eclogite and provenance of mélange sediments from Atbashi in the south Tianshan orogen of Kyrgyzstan

    E. Hegner;R. Klemd;A. Kröner;M. Corsini

  • An evaluation of reactive fluid flow and trace element mobility in subducting slabs

    Thomas Zack;Timm John;Timm John

  • Nb and Zr behavior in rutile during high-grade metamorphism and retrogression: An example from the Ivrea–Verbano Zone

    G.L. Luvizotto;T. Zack

  • In situ Rb–Sr and K–Ca dating by LA-ICP-MS/MS: an evaluation of N2O and SF6 as reaction gases

    K. Johan Hogmalm;Thomas Zack;Andreas K.-O. Karlsson;Axel S. L. Sjöqvist

  • Laser ablation Rb/Sr dating by online chemical separation of Rb and Sr in an oxygen-filled reaction cell

    Thomas Zack;K. Johan Hogmalm

  • Deducing source rock lithology from detrital rutile geochemistry: An example from the Erzgebirge, Germany

    Silke Triebold;Hilmar von Eynatten;George Luiz Luvizotto;Thomas Zack

  • Intercomparison of boron isotope and concentration measurements : Part II: Evaluation of results

    Roberto Gonfiantini;Sonia Tonarini;Manfred Gröning;Alessandra Adorni-Braccesi

  • Post-collisional adakite-like magmatism in the Ağvanis Massif and implications for the evolution of the Eocene magmatism in the Eastern Pontides (NE Turkey)

    Gültekin Topuz;Aral I. Okay;Rainer Altherr;Winfried H. Schwarz

  • Jurassic accretionary complex and ophiolite from northeast Turkey: No evidence for the Cimmerian continental ribbon

    Gültekin Topuz;Gönenç Göçmengil;Yann Rolland;Ö. Faruk Çelik

  • The volatile inventory (F, Cl, Br, S, C) of magmatic apatite: An integrated analytical approach

    Michael A.W. Marks;Thomas Wenzel;Martin J. Whitehouse;Matthias Loose

  • Petrology and Geochronology of Rutile

    Thomas Zack;Ellen Kooijman

Frequent Co-Authors

Jochen Halfar
Jochen Halfar University of Toronto
Dorrit E. Jacob
Dorrit E. Jacob Macquarie University
Walter H. Adey
Walter H. Adey National Museum of Natural History
Andreas Kronz
Andreas Kronz University of Göttingen
Daniel F. Stockli
Daniel F. Stockli The University of Texas at Austin
Robert S. Steneck
Robert S. Steneck University of Maine
Stephan Klemme
Stephan Klemme University of Münster
Axel K. Schmitt
Axel K. Schmitt Curtin University
Hilmar von Eynatten
Hilmar von Eynatten University of Göttingen
Ivan P. Savov
Ivan P. Savov University of Leeds

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science through online degrees opens doors to diverse career pathways that extend beyond traditional roles. Many students seek programs that offer flexibility, affordability, and support tailored to specific needs. For example, those looking for specialized fields can find options like military friendly online photography degree programs, which combine creative skills with technical knowledge.

Cost efficiency is often a priority, especially for adult learners or working professionals. Programs listed under cheapest online spanish degree demonstrate that affordable education can lead to well-paying jobs. Similarly, veterans can benefit from tailored studies found in the veteran friendly online spanish degree category, which offer specialized resources and support.

For those interested in blending science with arts, pursuing an online mfa provides creative avenues that complement Earth Science expertise. These degrees not only enrich personal growth but also enhance career versatility in a competitive job market.

Choosing the right online degree involves balancing affordability, program focus, and support systems, especially for unique populations like veterans. Understanding your options helps you align educational goals with long-term career success.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Zack

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles