World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
88
Citations
24957
World Ranking
2732
National Ranking
1414

Thomas S. Whittam publications per year

1980: 3 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 1 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 1 publications 1985: 1 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publications 2013: 2 publications
1980 2013

188 publications in total across all disciplines

Thomas S. Whittam publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas S. Whittam sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 185 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Thomas S. Whittam D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas S. Whittam sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas S. Whittam is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their academic profile reflects involvement in a range of scientific research activities, though specific details about recent papers, co-authors, and publication venues are not documented in the available data.

The scientist's work does not have recorded publications in major fields or subfields of study, nor are there documented main topics or thematic areas outlined. Likewise, there is no listed record of books published under their name or associations with any publishing houses.

No awards or honors have been listed for Thomas S. Whittam, and there is no indication of their passing, suggesting they are currently living. The absence of detailed research outputs or collaboration records limits a comprehensive overview of their scientific contributions based on the available information.

Best Publications

  • Methods of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis for bacterial population genetics and systematics

    R. K. Selander;D. A. Caugant;H. Ochman;James M. Musser

  • Restricted structural gene polymorphism in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex indicates evolutionarily recent global dissemination

    Srinand Sreevatsan;Xi Pan;Kathryn E. Stockbauer;Nancy D. Connell

  • Phylogenetic distribution of branched RNA-linked multicopy single-stranded DNA among natural isolates of Escherichia coli.

    P J Herzer;S Inouye;M Inouye;T S Whittam

  • Parallel evolution of virulence in pathogenic Escherichia coli

    Sean D. Reid;Corinne J. Herbelin;Alyssa C. Bumbaugh;Robert K. Selander

  • Variation in virulence among clades of Escherichia coli O157:H7 associated with disease outbreaks

    Shannon D. Manning;Alifiya S. Motiwala;A. Cody Springman;Weihong Qi

  • Carbonic anhydrase is an ancient enzyme widespread in prokaryotes

    Kerry S. Smith;Claudia Jakubzick;Thomas S. Whittam;James G. Ferry

  • Clonal relationships among Escherichia coli strains that cause hemorrhagic colitis and infantile diarrhea.

    T S Whittam;M L Wolfe;I K Wachsmuth;F Orskov

  • Complete genomic sequence of Pasteurella multocida, Pm70.

    Barbara J. May;Qing Zhang;Ling Ling Li;Michael L. Paustian

  • Type III protein secretion mechanism in mammalian and plant pathogens.

    Sheng Yang He;Kinya Nomura;Thomas S. Whittam

  • Global Phylogeny of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Based on Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) Analysis: Insights into Tuberculosis Evolution, Phylogenetic Accuracy of Other DNA Fingerprinting Systems, and Recommendations for a Minimal Standard SNP Set

    Ingrid Filliol;Alifiya S. Motiwala;Magali Cavatore;Weihong Qi

  • Genotypic and phenotypic changes in the emergence of Escherichia coli O157:H7.

    Peter Feng;Keith A. Lampel;Helge Karch;Thomas S. Whittam

  • Pathogenesis and evolution of virulence in enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli

    Michael S. Donnenberg;Thomas S. Whittam

  • Genetic structure of populations of Legionella pneumophila.

    R K Selander;R M McKinney;T S Whittam;W F Bibb

  • Multilocus genetic structure in natural populations of Escherichia coli.

    Thomas S. Whittam;Howard Ochman;Robert K. Selander

  • Cryptic Lineages of the Genus Escherichia

    Seth T. Walk;Elizabeth W. Alm;David M. Gordon;Jeffrey L. Ram

  • Molecular genetic relationships of the salmonellae.

    E. F. Boyd;Fu-Sheng Wang;T. S. Whittam;R. K. Selander

  • Phylogenetic analysis of enteroaggregative and diffusely adherent Escherichia coli.

    John R. Czeczulin;Thomas S. Whittam;Ian R. Henderson;Fernando Navarro-Garcia;Fernando Navarro-Garcia

  • Evolution of Genomic Content in the Stepwise Emergence of Escherichia coli O157:H7

    Lukas M. Wick;Weihong Qi;David W. Lacher;Thomas S. Whittam

  • Genetic diversity and population structure of Escherichia coli isolated from freshwater beaches

    Seth T. Walk;Elizabeth W. Alm;Lisa M. Calhoun;Janice M. Mladonicky

  • Clonal Relationships among Escherichia coliStrains That CauseHemorrhagic Colitis andInfantile Diarrhea

    Thomas S. Whittam;Marie L. Wolfe;I. Kaye Wachsmuth;Richard A. Wilson

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert K. Selander
Robert K. Selander University of Rochester
James M. Musser
James M. Musser Houston Methodist
Dominique A. Caugant
Dominique A. Caugant Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Phillip I. Tarr
Phillip I. Tarr Washington University in St. Louis
Vivek Kapur
Vivek Kapur Pennsylvania State University
Howard Ochman
Howard Ochman The University of Texas at Austin
Ida Ørskov
Ida Ørskov Statens Serum Institut
Luiz R. Trabulsi
Luiz R. Trabulsi Instituto Butantan
Frits Ørskov
Frits Ørskov Statens Serum Institut
andrew g clark
andrew g clark Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to diverse career pathways, including opportunities in healthcare management and medical coding. Students interested in the business side of healthcare may consider an online healthcare MBA to gain specialized leadership and management skills tailored for healthcare settings.

Alternatively, combining a strong scientific background with certifications in medical billing and coding can lead to rewarding roles in healthcare operations. Understanding the differences between ccs vs cpc certifications is essential for choosing the most suitable credential for your career goals.

Career prospects for medical coders are strong, with competitive medical coder salary potential based on experience, certification, and geographic location. Before pursuing this path, it's helpful to weigh the medical coding job outlook and consider both the advantages and challenges of working in this growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas S. Whittam

Recently Published Articles