World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
18340
World Ranking
8030
National Ranking
4294

Thomas R. Przybeck publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas R. Przybeck sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 51 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Thomas R. Przybeck D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas R. Przybeck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas R. Przybeck is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their academic profile indicates a research career connected with this institution.

A comprehensive view of their work shows no recorded recent papers, frequent co-authors, or predominant publication venues available at this time.

There is no specific information related to book publications or documented main fields and subfields of study. Likewise, there is no detailed data on the main topics of their research work or awards received.

The publicly available data does not include citations, papers, or collaborations, which limits insight into the scope of their research impact or academic network.

Thomas R. Przybeck is currently an active researcher, with no indication of being deceased.

Best Publications

  • A Psychobiological Model of Temperament and Character

    C. Robert Cloninger;Dragan M. Svrakic;Thomas R. Przybeck

  • The Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire: U.S. normative data.

    C. Robert Cloninger;Thomas R. Przybeck;Dragan M. Svrakic

  • The effect of prescribed daily dose frequency on patient medication compliance.

    Seth A. Eisen;Douglas K. Miller;Robert S. Woodward;Edward Spitznagel

  • Differential Diagnosis of Personality Disorders by the Seven-Factor Model of Temperament and Character

    Dragan M. Svrakic;Cynthia Whitehead;Thomas R. Przybeck;C. Robert Cloninger

  • Prevalence and correlates of binge eating disorder in a community sample.

    Richard A. Grucza;Thomas R. Przybeck;C. Robert Cloninger

  • Reciprocal social behavior in children with and without pervasive developmental disorders.

    John N. Constantino;Thomas Przybeck;Darrin Friesen;Richard D. Todd

  • The factor structure of autistic traits

    John N. Constantino;Christian P. Gruber;Sandra Davis;Stephanie Hayes

  • Temperament, character, and personality disorders: etiologic, diagnostic, treatment issues

    D. M. Svrakic;S. Draganic;K. Hill;C. Bayon

  • Can personality assessment predict future depression? A twelve-month follow-up of 631 subjects.

    C. Robert Cloninger;Dragan M. Svrakic;Thomas R. Przybeck

  • Temperament dimensions explain the comorbidity of psychiatric disorders

    Marco Battaglia;Marco Battaglia;Thomas R Przybeck;Thomas R Przybeck;Laura Bellodi;Laura Bellodi;C.Robert Cloninger;C.Robert Cloninger

  • Temperament and Character Inventory

    Unknown

  • The relationship of personality to mood and anxiety states: A dimensional approach

    Stephen L. Brown;Dragon M. Svrakic;Thomas R. Przybeck;Robert C. Cloninger

  • Swedish normative data on personality using the temperament and character inventory

    Sven Brändström;Sven Brändström;Sven Brändström;Paul Schlette;Paul Schlette;Paul Schlette;Thomas R Przybeck;Thomas R Przybeck;Thomas R Przybeck;Mattias Lundberg;Mattias Lundberg;Mattias Lundberg

  • THE JUNIOR TEMPERAMENT AND CHARACTER INVENTORY: PRELIMINARY VALIDATION OF A CHILD SELF-REPORT MEASURE

    Joan L. Luby;Dragan M. Svrakic;Kimberli McCallum;Thomas R. Przybeck

  • Anxiety proneness linked to epistatic loci in genome scan of human personality traits.

    C. R. Cloninger;P. Van Eerdewegh;A. Goate;Howard Edenberg

  • Mood states and personality traits.

    Dragan M. Svrakic;Thomas R. Przybeck;C.Robert Cloninger

  • Discrepancies in estimates of prevalence and correlates of substance use and disorders between two national surveys

    Richard A. Grucza;Anna M. Abbacchi;Thomas R. Przybeck;Joseph C. Gfroerer

  • Dimensional assessment of personality in an out-patient sample: Relations of the systems of Millon and Cloninger

    Carmen Bayon;Kent Hill;Dragan M. Svrakic;Thomas R. Przybeck

  • Personality and depressive symptoms: a multi-dimensional analysis

    Richard A. Grucza;Thomas R. Przybeck;Edward L. Spitznagel;C.Robert Cloninger

  • Personality characteristics in obesity and relationship with successful weight loss

    Unknown

  • Further contribution to the conceptual validity of the unified biosocial model of personality : US and Yugoslav data

    Dragan M. Švrakić;Thomas R. Przybeck;C.Robert Cloninger

  • Prevalence and predictors of pathological gambling: results from the St. Louis personality, health and lifestyle (SLPHL) study.

    Renee M. Cunningham-Williams;Richard A. Grucza;Linda B. Cottler;Sharon B. Womack

Frequent Co-Authors

C. Robert Cloninger
C. Robert Cloninger Washington University in St. Louis
Edward L. Spitznagel
Edward L. Spitznagel Washington University in St. Louis
John N. Constantino
John N. Constantino Washington University in St. Louis
Lars-Göran Nilsson
Lars-Göran Nilsson Stockholm University
Rolf Adolfsson
Rolf Adolfsson Umeå University
Joan L. Luby
Joan L. Luby Washington University in St. Louis
Alison Goate
Alison Goate Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Marco Battaglia
Marco Battaglia Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Laura Bellodi
Laura Bellodi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
John Blangero
John Blangero The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to diverse online programs and rewarding careers, including roles in mental health, counseling, and addiction recovery. Many students choose to specialize further, such as working as a substance abuse counselor, a field with growing demand and a strong need for qualified professionals.

Requirements to become a substance abuse counselor vary by location and typically involve completing an accredited degree, meeting supervised training hours, and passing relevant exams. For example, Cincinnati substance abuse counselor certification requirements include earning a counseling-related degree and state licensure. In Cleveland, Cleveland substance abuse counselors education requirements emphasize specific course work and clinical experience.

The pathway can differ significantly in other cities, too. For those considering becoming a substance abuse counselor in Colorado Springs, local criteria may prioritize additional fieldwork or credentials. Meanwhile, those interested in the substance abuse counselor requirements in Columbus will need to follow a combination of academic and practicum standards set by Ohio's boards.

With numerous online degrees and credentialing pathways, psychology students can find flexible options that align with their career ambitions and state-specific requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas R. Przybeck

Recently Published Articles