World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
10931
World Ranking
4361
National Ranking
381

Thomas R. Barrick publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas R. Barrick sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 157 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Thomas R. Barrick D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas R. Barrick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas R. Barrick is affiliated with St George's, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant emphasis on advanced imaging techniques and neurological studies.

The main fields of study in their work include:

  • Medicine

Their research further delves into several subfields, such as:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Key topics addressed in Barrick's publications include:

  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • NMR spectroscopy and applications
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

They have contributed to several recent papers:

  • "A Comparison of Connected Speech Tasks for Detecting Early Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning" (2021) published in Frontiers in Computer Science
  • "The PASTIS trial: Testing tadalafil for possible use in vascular cognitive impairment" (2022) published in Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • "Network neuroscience of apathy in cerebrovascular disease" (2020) published in Progress in Neurobiology
  • "PRESERVE: Randomized Trial of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Control in Small Vessel Disease" (2021) published in Stroke
  • "Determining the OPTIMAL DTI analysis method for application in cerebral small vessel disease" (2022) published in NeuroImage Clinical

The venues where Barrick frequently publishes include:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Stroke
  • Frontiers in Computer Science
  • Progress in Neurobiology

Among their frequent co-authors are:

  • Franklyn A. Howe
  • Catherine A. Spilling
  • Mohani-Preet K. Dhillon
  • Usman Khan
  • Jeremy Madigan

Best Publications

  • Voxel-based morphometry reveals increased gray matter density in Broca's area in male symphony orchestra musicians

    Vanessa Sluming;Thomas R. Barrick;Matthew Howard;Matthew Howard;Enis Cezayirli

  • White matter damage on diffusion tensor imaging correlates with age-related cognitive decline.

    Rebecca A Charlton;T R Barrick;D J McIntyre;Y Shen

  • Atlas-based segmentation of white matter tracts of the human brain using diffusion tensor tractography and comparison with classical dissection

    I. Nigel C. Lawes;Thomas R. Barrick;Vengadasalam Murugam;Natalia Spierings

  • White matter fiber tracking in patients with space-occupying lesions of the brain: a new technique for neurosurgical planning?

    Chris A Clark;Thomas R Barrick;Mary M Murphy;B.Anthony Bell

  • Blood–brain barrier permeability is increased in normal-appearing white matter in patients with lacunar stroke and leucoaraiosis

    R Topakian;T R Barrick;F A Howe;H S Markus

  • Automated brain tumour detection and segmentation using superpixel-based extremely randomized trees in FLAIR MRI.

    Mohammadreza Soltaninejad;Guang Yang;Guang Yang;Tryphon Lambrou;Nigel M. Allinson

  • Structural network efficiency is associated with cognitive impairment in small-vessel disease

    Andrew J. Lawrence;Ai Wern Chung;Robin G. Morris;Hugh S. Markus

  • Theory of mind associations with other cognitive functions and brain imaging in normal aging.

    Rebecca A Charlton;Thomas R Barrick;Hugh S Markus;Robin G Morris

  • The influence of genetic and cardiovascular risk factors on the CADASIL phenotype

    Sumeet Singhal;Steve Bevan;Tom Barrick;Philip Rich

  • White matter structural decline in normal ageing: a prospective longitudinal study using tract-based spatial statistics.

    Thomas R. Barrick;Rebecca A. Charlton;Chris A. Clark;Hugh S. Markus

  • Corpus callosum damage in heavy marijuana use: preliminary evidence from diffusion tensor tractography and tract-based spatial statistics

    Danilo Arnone;Thomas R. Barrick;S. Chengappa;Clare E. Mackay

  • Voxel-based morphometric comparison of hippocampal and extrahippocampal abnormalities in patients with left and right hippocampal atrophy.

    Simon S. Keller;Clare E. Mackay;Thomas R. Barrick;Udo C. Wieshmann

  • Multi-centre reproducibility of diffusion MRI parameters for clinical sequences in the brain.

    Matthew Grech-Sollars;Patrick W Hales;Keiko Miyazaki;Felix Raschke

  • Supervised learning based multimodal MRI brain tumour segmentation using texture features from supervoxels

    Mohammadreza Soltaninejad;Guang Yang;Guang Yang;Tryphon Lambrou;Nigel M. Allinson

  • White matter pathways associated with working memory in normal aging.

    Rebecca A. Charlton;Thomas R. Barrick;I. Nigel C. Lawes;Hugh S. Markus

  • Mechanisms of Cognitive Impairment in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: Multimodal MRI Results from the St George's Cognition and Neuroimaging in Stroke (SCANS) Study

    Andrew J. Lawrence;Bhavini Patel;Robin G. Morris;Andrew D. MacKinnon

  • Multimodal MRI in cerebral small vessel disease: its relationship with cognition and sensitivity to change over time.

    Arani Nitkunan;Tom R. Barrick;Rebecca A. Charlton;Chris A. Clark

  • White Matter Pathway Asymmetry Underlies Functional Lateralization

    T R Barrick;I N Lawes;C E Mackay;C A Clark

  • Differential relationships between apathy and depression with white matter microstructural changes and functional outcomes

    Matthew J. Hollocks;Andrew J. Lawrence;Rebecca L. Brookes;Thomas R. Barrick

  • Voxel-based morphometry and stereology provide convergent evidence of the importance of medial prefrontal cortex for fluid intelligence in healthy adults

    Qiyong Gong;Qiyong Gong;Vanessa Sluming;Andrew Mayes;Simon S. Keller

Frequent Co-Authors

Hugh S. Markus
Hugh S. Markus University of Cambridge
Robin G. Morris
Robin G. Morris King's College London
Neil Roberts
Neil Roberts University of Edinburgh
Clare E. Mackay
Clare E. Mackay University of Oxford
Paul W. Jones
Paul W. Jones St George's, University of London
Lynn E. DeLisi
Lynn E. DeLisi Harvard Medical School
John T. O'Brien
John T. O'Brien University of Cambridge
Andrew M. Blamire
Andrew M. Blamire Newcastle University
Gary A. Ford
Gary A. Ford University of Oxford
Masud Husain
Masud Husain University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience can open doors to a variety of related fields. Many students consider degrees in psychology, social work, clinical practice, or therapy. With online education growing, there are now flexible and affordable pathways available for advancing your studies and career in these areas.

Those seeking an accessible entry point might look into the most affordable online psychology degree options. For individuals aiming to work in the helping professions, earning a masters in social work online can lead to roles in counseling, advocacy, and community engagement.

For advanced, clinician-focused roles, the online psyd pathway allows you to study clinical psychology at the doctoral level, preparing for licensure and independent practice. Those interested in family and relationship counseling have the option of pursuing a credential through mft online programs, which provide training in marriage and family therapy.

Each of these online degree pathways offers unique advantages for students passionate about the mind, behavior, and human well-being—building on your Neuroscience background for a dynamic and impactful career.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas R. Barrick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles