World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas Bonald

Thomas Bonald

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
6553
World Ranking
10658
National Ranking
261

Thomas Bonald publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Bonald sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 198 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Thomas Bonald D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Bonald sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Bonald is a researcher affiliated with Télécom ParisTech in France. Their work primarily falls within the field of Computer Science, with a focus on Artificial Intelligence. They have contributed to several subfields including Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Molecular Biology, Signal Processing, and Biophysics.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Neural Networks and Applications

Bonald has published a number of scientific papers, appearing frequently in notable venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Nature Communications, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). Key publications include:

  • Scarf enables a highly memory-efficient analysis of large-scale single-cell genomics data, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Scikit-network: Graph Analysis in Python, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Pairwise Adjusted Mutual Information, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Scarf: A toolkit for memory efficient analysis of large-scale single-cell genomics data, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Factuality of Large Language Models in the Legal Domain, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)

The researcher has collaborated with several frequent co-authors. These include Fabian M. Suchanek, Nathan de Lara, Simon Delarue, Parashar Dhapola, and Johan Rodhe.

Best Publications

  • Analytic evaluation of RED performance

    T. Bonald;M. May;J.-C. Bolot

  • Impact of fairness on Internet performance

    Thomas Bonald;Laurent Massoulié

  • Statistical bandwidth sharing: a study of congestion at flow level

    S. Ben Fred;T. Bonald;A. Proutiere;G. Régnié

  • Wireless downlink data channels: user performance and cell dimensioning

    Thomas Bonald;Alexandre Proutière

  • Epidemic live streaming: optimal performance trade-offs

    Thomas Bonald;Laurent Massoulié;Fabien Mathieu;Diego Perino

  • A queueing analysis of max-min fairness, proportional fairness and balanced fairness

    T. Bonald;L. Massoulié;A. Proutière;J. Virtamo

  • A Score-Based Opportunistic Scheduler for Fading Radio Channels

    Thomas Bonald

  • Insensitive Bandwidth Sharing in Data Networks

    T. Bonald;A. Proutière

  • Insensitivity in processor-sharing networks

    T. Bonald;A. Proutière

  • Statistical performance guarantees for streaming flows using expedited forwarding

    T. Bonald;A. Proutiere;J.W. Roberts

  • Inter-cell scheduling in wireless data networks

    Thomas Bonald;Sem Borst;Alexandre Proutiere

  • A recursive formula for multirate systems with elastic traffic

    T. Bonald;J. Virtamo

  • Wireless data performance in multi-cell scenarios

    T. Bonald;S. Borst;N. Hegde;A. Proutiére

  • Congestion at flow level and the impact of user behaviour

    T. Bonald;J. W. Roberts

  • How mobility impacts the flow-level performance of wireless data systems

    T. Bonald;S.C. Borst;A. Proutiere

  • Internet and the Erlang formula

    Thomas Bonald;James W. Roberts

  • On performance bounds for the integration of elastic and adaptive streaming flows

    Thomas Bonald;Alexandre Proutière

  • Flow-level performance and capacity of wireless networks with user mobility

    Thomas Bonald;Sem Borst;Nidhi Hegde;Matthieu Jonckheere

  • On performance bounds for balanced fairness

    T. Bonald;A. Proutière

  • Comparison of TCP Reno and TCP Vegas: efficiency and fairness

    Thomas Bonald

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems

    Thomas Bonald;N. Duffield

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexandre Proutiere
Alexandre Proutiere Royal Institute of Technology
James Roberts
James Roberts French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Marc Lelarge
Marc Lelarge École Normale Supérieure
Sem Borst
Sem Borst Eindhoven University of Technology
Dario Rossi
Dario Rossi Télécom ParisTech
Laurent Massoulié
Laurent Massoulié French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Gustavo de Veciana
Gustavo de Veciana The University of Texas at Austin
Jason Nieh
Jason Nieh Columbia University
Philippe Ciblat
Philippe Ciblat Télécom ParisTech
Charles Bordenave
Charles Bordenave Aix-Marseille University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology continues to advance, online education offers flexible and affordable opportunities for students pursuing careers in Computer Science and related fields. When considering degree options, affordability and program reputation are essential factors to weigh.

If you’re looking for budget-friendly options, the cheapest online bachelor degree programs can help lower the cost of your education without sacrificing quality. For those interested in more specialized technical roles, pursuing an online bachelor's in engineering is a practical pathway into high-demand jobs in sectors like software, hardware, or IT.

Leadership or management roles in technology may require advanced credentials. An executive mba online equips professionals with the business acumen needed for upper-level positions in tech companies or startups. Additionally, if you are drawn to data stewardship or digital information management, a library sciences degree can pave the way for unique careers intersecting with technology and information science.

Exploring these related online degrees can open diverse career pathways while offering flexibility to fit your schedule and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Bonald

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles