World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
10025
World Ranking
10810
National Ranking
2971

Steven M. Cramer publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven M. Cramer sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 264 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Steven M. Cramer D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven M. Cramer sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Chemical Society
  • 1997 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Steven M. Cramer is affiliated with Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in the United States. Their research contributions span several disciplines, primarily focused on engineering, biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, and chemistry.

They have published extensively in fields such as molecular biology, spectroscopy, biomedical engineering, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and industrial and manufacturing engineering. Their main topics of work include analytical chemistry and chromatography, protein purification and stability, monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies research, advanced chemical sensor technologies, metabolomics and mass spectrometry studies, microfluidic and capillary electrophoresis applications, and spectroscopy and quantum chemical studies.

Frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • Biotechnology Progress
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Chromatography A
  • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Understanding the effects of system differences for parameter estimation and scale-up of high throughput chromatographic data, 2021, Journal of Chromatography A
  • A thermodynamic evaluation of antibody-surface interactions in multimodal cation exchange chromatography, 2020, Journal of Chromatography A
  • High-throughput in silico workflow for optimization and characterization of multimodal chromatographic processes, 2024, Biotechnology Progress
  • Effects of Air-Entraining Admixtures on Stability of Air Bubbles in Concrete, 2021, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
  • Probing IgG1 FC-Multimodal Nanoparticle Interactions: A Combined Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Molecular Dynamics Simulations Approach, 2021, Langmuir

Frequent co-authors of Steven M. Cramer include:

  • Scott H. Altern
  • John P. Welsh
  • Chris Williams
  • Abraham M. Lenhoff
  • Vijesh Kumar

They have been recognized with fellowships including:

  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2017
  • Fellow of the American Chemical Society, 2012
  • Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE), 1997

Best Publications

  • Steric mass-action ion exchange: Displacement profiles and induced salt gradients

    Clayton A. Brooks;Steven M. Cramer

  • Potential for Using Waste Glass in Portland Cement Concrete

    Craig Polley;Steven M. Cramer;Rodolfo V. de la Cruz

  • Prediction of protein retention times in anion-exchange chromatography systems using support vector regression.

    Minghu Song;Curt M. Breneman;Jinbo Bi;Nagamani Sukumar

  • Antibody variable region interactions with Protein A: Implications for the development of generic purification processes

    Sanchayita Ghose;Martin Allen;Brian Hubbard;Clayton Brooks

  • Evaluation and comparison of alternatives to Protein A chromatography Mimetic and hydrophobic charge induction chromatographic stationary phases.

    Sanchayita Ghose;Brian Hubbard;Steven M Cramer

  • A holistic approach to protein secondary structure characterization using amide I band Raman spectroscopy.

    Samir U. Sane;Steven M. Cramer;Todd M. Przybycien

  • Binding capacity differences for antibodies and Fc-fusion proteins on protein A chromatographic materials

    Sanchayita Ghose;Brian Hubbard;Steven M. Cramer

  • Optimization of preparative ion-exchange chromatography of proteins: linear gradient separations

    S.R. Gallant;S. Vunnum;S.M. Cramer

  • Downstream bioprocessing: recent advances and future promise

    Steven M Cramer;Melissa A Holstein

  • The ROMACONS Project: a contribution to the historical and engineering analysis of hydraulic concrete in Roman maritime structures

    John Peter Oleson;Christopher Brandon;Steven M. Cramer;Roberto Cucitore

  • Membrane chromatographic systems for high-throughput protein separations

    Joseph A. Gerstner;Richard Hamilton;Steven M. Cramer

  • Ion-exchange displacement chromatography of proteins

    Guhan Jayaraman;Shishir D. Gadam;Steven M. Cramer

  • Characterization of non-linear adsorption properties of dextran-based polyelectrolyte displacers in ion-exchange systems

    Shishir D. Gadam;Guhan Jayaraman;Steven M. Cramer

  • Prediction of protein retention in ion-exchange systems using molecular descriptors obtained from crystal structure.

    Mazza Cb;Sukumar N;Breneman Cm;Cramer Sm

  • Ion-exchange displacement chromatography of proteins Dendritic polymers as novel displacers

    Guhan Jayaraman;Yu-Fei Li;J.A. Moore;Steven M. Cramer

  • On-demand manufacturing of clinical-quality biopharmaceuticals

    Crowell Le;Lu Ae;Love Kr;Stockdale A

  • Protein Interactions in Hydrophobic Charge Induction Chromatography (HCIC)

    Sanchayita Ghose;Brian Hubbard;Steven M. Cramer

  • A priori prediction of adsorption isotherm parameters and chromatographic behavior in ion-exchange systems

    Asif Ladiwala;Kaushal Rege;Curtis M. Breneman;Steven M. Cramer

  • Earlywood and latewood elastic properties in loblolly pine

    Steven Cramer;David Kretschmann;Roderic Lakes;Troy Schmidt

  • Investigation of protein retention and selectivity in HIC systems using quantitative structure retention relationship models.

    Asif Ladiwala;Fang Xia;Qiong Luo;Curt M. Breneman

  • Modeling non-linear elution of proteins in ion-exchange chromatography

    Stuart R. Gallant;Amitava Kundu;Steven M. Cramer

  • ACCELERATED PUBLICATION Antibody Variable Region Interactions with Protein A: Implications for the Development of Generic Purification Processes

    Sanchayita Ghose;Martin Allen;Brian Hubbard;Clayton Brooks

  • Prediction of protein retention times in anion-exchange chromatography systems using support vector regression

    Curt M. Breneman;Minghu Song;Jinbo Bi;N. Sukumar

Frequent Co-Authors

Shekhar Garde
Shekhar Garde Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Jonathan S. Dordick
Jonathan S. Dordick Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
B. Wayne Bequette
B. Wayne Bequette Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Joel L. Plawsky
Joel L. Plawsky Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Wilfred Chen
Wilfred Chen University of Delaware
Georges Belfort
Georges Belfort Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Jinbo Bi
Jinbo Bi University of Connecticut
Ravi S. Kane
Ravi S. Kane Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Chemistry-related careers often leads students to consider a diverse range of study options and professional routes. For those interested in complementary disciplines, an accredited online criminal justice associate degree can provide foundational knowledge that pairs well with scientific understanding in regulatory or forensic fields.

Another valuable qualification is a paralegal certificate, which can open doors to legal support roles within pharmaceutical companies or chemical patent law, blending science with legal expertise.

For those drawn to the business side of Chemistry, learning how to get into pharmaceutical sales is a practical pathway. It combines scientific knowledge with communication skills to effectively market and promote health products.

Finally, pursuing advanced education in Chemistry can lead to becoming a pharmacist. Understanding how much schooling to be a pharmacist is essential, as this career requires rigorous academic preparation but offers a rewarding role in health care and medication management.

Best Scientists Citing Steven M. Cramer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles