World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sonia Martin-Lopez

Sonia Martin-Lopez

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 36 8719 8404 210 207 243 5218

Sonia Martin-Lopez publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sonia Martin-Lopez between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sonia Martin-Lopez published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 11.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2023. 25 of the 263 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2023. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 29 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 10 publications
2003 2025

263 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sonia Martin-Lopez: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 5
2005 6
2006 8
2007 3
2008 4
2009 9
2010 9
2011 7
2012 14
2013 9
2014 12
2015 13
2016 15
2017 21
2018 13
2019 13
2020 7
2021 23
2022 16
2023 29
2024 15
2025 10
Total 263
Download as CSV

Sonia Martin-Lopez publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sonia Martin-Lopez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 238–247 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 243 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260 243
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Sonia Martin-Lopez D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sonia Martin-Lopez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311 36
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Sonia Martin-Lopez is affiliated with the University of Alcalá in Spain. Their research primarily lies at the intersection of Engineering and Physics and Astronomy, with significant focus on Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics as subfields.

The scientist's work encompasses several main topics, including:

  • Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors
  • Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies
  • Photonic and Optical Devices
  • Seismic Waves and Analysis
  • Optical Network Technologies
  • Advanced Photonic Communication Systems
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques

Frequent coauthors in their publications include:

  • Miguel González-Herráez
  • María R. Fernández-Ruiz
  • Hugo F. Martins
  • Miguel Soriano-Amat
  • Vicente Durán

They have published extensively in several scientific venues, with a focus on:

  • Journal of Lightwave Technology
  • Optics Express
  • 27th International Conference on Optical Fiber Sensors
  • Optics Letters
  • Sensors

Selected recent papers illustrate the range and focus of their research:

  • Distributed acoustic sensing for seismic activity monitoring, 2020, APL Photonics
  • Time-expanded phase-sensitive optical time-domain reflectometry, 2021, Light Science & Applications
  • Seismic Monitoring With Distributed Acoustic Sensing From the Near-Surface to the Deep Oceans, 2021, Journal of Lightwave Technology
  • Surface Gravity Wave Interferometry and Ocean Current Monitoring With Ocean-Bottom DAS, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • Noise Levels and Signals Observed on Submarine Fibers in the Canary Islands Using DAS, 2021, Seismological Research Letters

Best Publications

  • Single-shot distributed temperature and strain tracking using direct detection phase-sensitive OTDR with chirped pulses.

    J Pastor-Graells;H F Martins;A Garcia-Ruiz;S Martin-Lopez

  • Coherent Noise Reduction in High Visibility Phase-Sensitive Optical Time Domain Reflectometer for Distributed Sensing of Ultrasonic Waves

    Hugo F. Martins;Sonia Martin-Lopez;Pedro Corredera;Massimo L. Filograno

  • Toward Prevention of Pipeline Integrity Threats Using a Smart Fiber-Optic Surveillance System

    Javier Tejedor;Hugo F. Martins;Daniel Piote;Javier Macias-Guarasa

  • Real-Time Monitoring of Railway Traffic Using Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors

    M. L. Filograno;P. Corredera Guillen;A. Rodriguez-Barrios;S. Martin-Lopez

  • Phase-sensitive Optical Time Domain Reflectometer Assisted by First-order Raman Amplification for Distributed Vibration Sensing Over >100 km

    Hugo F. Martins;Sonia Martin-Lopez;Pedro Corredera;Massimo L. Filograno

  • Distributed Brillouin Fiber Sensor Assisted by First-Order Raman Amplification

    Félix Rodriguez-Barrios;Sonia Martin-Lopez;Ana Carrasco-Sanz;Pedro Corredera

  • Distributed acoustic sensing for seismic activity monitoring

    María R. Fernández-Ruiz;Marcelo A. Soto;Ethan F. Williams;Sonia Martin-Lopez

  • Modulation instability-induced fading in phase-sensitive optical time-domain reflectometry

    Hugo F. Martins;Sonia Martin-Lopez;Pedro Corredera;Pedro Salgado

  • The role of pump incoherence in continuous-wave supercontinuum generation

    Frédérique Vanholsbeeck;Sonia Martin-Lopez;Miguel González-Herráez;Stéphane Coen

  • Brillouin optical time-domain analysis assisted by second-order Raman amplification

    Sonia Martin-Lopez;Mercedes Alcon-Camas;Felix Rodriguez;Pedro Corredera

  • A Novel Fiber Optic Based Surveillance System for Prevention of Pipeline Integrity Threats

    Javier Tejedor;Javier Macias-Guarasa;Hugo F. Martins;Daniel Piote

  • Machine Learning Methods for Pipeline Surveillance Systems Based on Distributed Acoustic Sensing: A Review

    Javier Tejedor;Javier Macias-Guarasa;Hugo Fidalgo Martins;Juan Pastor-Graells

  • Extending the Real Remoteness of Long-Range Brillouin Optical Time-Domain Fiber Analyzers

    Marcelo A. Soto;Xabier Angulo-Vinuesa;Sonia Martin-Lopez;Sang-Hoon Chin

  • Real Field Deployment of a Smart Fiber-Optic Surveillance System for Pipeline Integrity Threat Detection: Architectural Issues and Blind Field Test Results

    Javier Tejedor;Javier Macias-Guarasa;Hugo F. Martins;Juan Pastor-Graells

  • Real time dynamic strain monitoring of optical links using the backreflection of live PSK data.

    H F Martins;K Shi;B C Thomsen;S Martin-Lopez

  • Raman-Assisted Brillouin Distributed Temperature Sensor Over 100 km Featuring 2 m Resolution and 1.2 $^{\circ}$ C Uncertainty

    X. Angulo-Vinuesa;S. Martin-Lopez;J. Nuno;P. Corredera

  • Distributed Vibration Sensing Over 125 km With Enhanced SNR Using Phi-OTDR Over a URFL Cavity

    Hugo F. Martins;Sonia Martin-Lopez;Pedro Corredera;Juan Diego Ania-Castanon

  • Time-expanded phase-sensitive optical time-domain reflectometry.

    Miguel Soriano-Amat;Hugo F. Martins;Vicente Durán;Luis Costa

  • Non-local effects in dual-probe-sideband Brillouin optical time domain analysis.

    Alejandro Dominguez-Lopez;Xabier Angulo-Vinuesa;Alexia Lopez-Gil;Sonia Martin-Lopez

  • Fully Distributed Optical Fiber Strain Sensor With 10 −12 ϵ/√Hz Sensitivity

    Luis Costa;Hugo F. Martins;Sonia Martin-Lopez;Maria R. Fernandez-Ruiz

  • Supercontinuum generation using a continuous-wave Raman fiber laser

    M. González-Herráez;S. Martı́n-López;P. Corredera;M.L. Hernanz

  • Raman-assisted Brillouin optical time-domain analysis with sub-meter resolution over 100 km.

    Xabier Angulo-Vinuesa;Sonia Martín-López;Pedro Corredera;Miguel González-Herráez

Frequent Co-Authors

Miguel Gonzalez-Herraez
Miguel Gonzalez-Herraez University of Alcalá
Luc Thévenaz
Luc Thévenaz École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Marcelo A. Soto
Marcelo A. Soto Federico Santa María Technical University
Orlando Frazão
Orlando Frazão Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering of Porto
Manuel Lopez-Amo
Manuel Lopez-Amo Universidad Publica De Navarra
Zhongwen Zhan
Zhongwen Zhan California Institute of Technology
Walter Margulis
Walter Margulis Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro
Deolinda Flores
Deolinda Flores University of Porto
Luca Palmieri
Luca Palmieri University of Padua
Stéphane Coen
Stéphane Coen University of Auckland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to diverse career possibilities—including many outside traditional technical fields. Today, many students and professionals enhance their skills by pursuing flexible online programs that complement their STEM background.

For those interested in business fundamentals, a best online business degree can provide a strong foundation in management, finance, and marketing. Moving into leadership roles is possible with an online master's degree in organizational leadership, which focuses on developing effective management and team dynamics suitable for technical environments.

Engineers looking to specialize further may consider an mba in operations management online, which equips graduates with skills in overseeing processes and optimizing efficiency within tech-driven industries. For added convenience, students can explore online mba programs no gmat for flexible admission requirements and accelerated career advancement.

Exploring these online degrees can help engineering and technology students broaden their expertise and unlock new leadership opportunities in both technical and managerial sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Sonia Martin-Lopez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles