World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
43
Citations
13453
World Ranking
1650
National Ranking
712

Solomon Feferman publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Solomon Feferman sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 176 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Solomon Feferman D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Solomon Feferman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Mathematical Society
  • 1986 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 1972 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Solomon Feferman was affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research spanned multiple main fields, including Mathematics, Computer Science, and Psychology, each with a significant number of publications. Within these fields, their work also extended into specialized subfields such as Mathematical Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their contributions concentrated around several main topics of study: Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis, Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms, and Philosophy and Theoretical Science. These topics reflected a broad interdisciplinary approach combining rigorous mathematical theory with considerations of logic and cognitive processes.

Frequent collaborations were notable with Geoffrey Hellman, with whom Solomon Feferman coauthored multiple works. Although specific paper titles and publication venues are not documented here, such collaborative relationships indicate a sustained engagement in their areas of expertise.

Awards received during their career include being named a Fellow of the American Mathematical Society in 2013. Additionally, Solomon Feferman was recognized twice as a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, once in 1972 and again in 1986. These honors reflect recognition within the scientific and mathematical communities over several decades.

Best Publications

  • Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability.

    Solomon Feferman;Hartley Rogers

  • The first order properties of products of algebraic systems

    S. Feferman;R. L. Vaught

  • Arithmetization of metamathematics in a general setting

    Solomon Feferman

  • Model-Theoretic Logics

    Jon Barwise;Solomon Feferman

  • Toward Useful Type-Free Theories. I

    Solomon Feferman

  • A Language and Axioms for Explicit Mathematics

    Solomon Feferman

  • Constructive Theories of Functions and Classes

    Solomon Feferman

  • Transfinite recursive progressions of axiomatic theories

    Solomon Feferman

  • Iterated Inductive Definitions and Subsystems of Analysis: Recent Proof-theoretical Studies

    Wilfried Buchholz;Solomon Feferman;Wolfram Pohlers;Wilfried Sieg

  • Reflecting on incompleteness

    Solomon Feferman

  • Some applications of the notions of forcing and generic sets

    S. Feferman

  • Monadic Second-Order Theories

    Y. Gurevich

  • Theories of Finite Type Related to Mathematical Practice

    Solomon Feferman

  • Categorical Foundations and Foundations of Category Theory

    Solomon Feferman

  • Systems of predicative analysis, II: Representations of ordinals

    Solomon Feferman

  • Hilbert's program relativized; Proof-theoretical and foundational reductions

    Solomon Feferman

  • Does mathematics need new axioms

    Solomon Feferman;Harvey M. Friedman;Penelope Maddy;John R. Steel

  • Logic, Logics, and Logicism

    Solomon Feferman

  • Iterated Inductive Fixed-Point Theories: Application to Hancock's Conjecture

    Solomon Feferman

  • Lectures on proof theory

    Solomon Feferman

  • Does Mathematics Need New Axioms

    Solomon Feferman

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen G. Simpson
Stephen G. Simpson Pennsylvania State University
Yuri Gurevich
Yuri Gurevich University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Alfred Tarski
Alfred Tarski University of California, Berkeley
Vladimir Lifschitz
Vladimir Lifschitz The University of Texas at Austin
Erich Grädel
Erich Grädel RWTH Aachen University
Ilkka Niiniluoto
Ilkka Niiniluoto University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For Mathematics graduates looking to expand their career options, pursuing related online degrees can be a strategic move. Many students consider business administration to complement their analytical skills. Programs like 1 year mba programs offer a fast-track option for gaining vital management expertise without a lengthy commitment.

Flexibility is also crucial for working professionals. Those seeking convenience might explore online mba accepting transfer credits to leverage past coursework and accelerate their journey toward an MBA.

Alternatively, data-driven fields present promising opportunities. A master in data analytics can be an excellent fit for math graduates aiming to specialize in big data, predictive modeling, and business intelligence.

Finally, for those wanting an accessible entry point, exploring the easiest mba programs may offer a manageable path towards boosting qualifications and career advancement without overwhelming admission hurdles.

Best Scientists Citing Solomon Feferman

Recently Published Articles