World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
36
Citations
6725
World Ranking
2484
National Ranking
84

Sandro Wartzack publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandro Wartzack sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 481 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Sandro Wartzack D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandro Wartzack sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering

    Benjamin Schleich;Nabil Anwer;Luc Mathieu;Sandro Wartzack

  • CAx für Ingenieure: Eine praxisbezogene Einführung

    Unknown

  • Skin Model Shapes: A new paradigm shift for geometric variations modelling in mechanical engineering

    Unknown

  • Challenges and Potentials of Digital Twins and Industry 4.0 in Product Design and Production for High Performance Products

    Raphael Wagner;Benjamin Schleich;Benjamin Haefner;Andreas Kuhnle

  • Effective usage of 2D MXene nanosheets as solid lubricant – Influence of contact pressure and relative humidity

    Max Marian;Gui Cheng Song;Bo Wang;Victor M. Fuenzalida

  • Mxene nanosheets as an emerging solid lubricant for machine elements – Towards increased energy efficiency and service life

    Max Marian;Stephan Tremmel;Sandro Wartzack;Guichen Song

  • From solid modelling to skin model shapes: Shifting paradigms in computer-aided tolerancing

    Unknown

  • Approaches for the assembly simulation of skin model shapes

    Unknown

  • From tolerance allocation to tolerance-cost optimization: a comprehensive literature review

    Unknown

  • Halide-Free Synthesis and Tribological Performance of Oil-Miscible Ammonium and Phosphonium-Based Ionic Liquids

    A. Westerholt;M. Weschta;A. Bösmann;S. Tremmel

  • Efficiency improvement in automobile bucket tappet/camshaft contacts by DLC coatings – Influence of engine oil, temperature and camshaft speed

    Ladislaus Dobrenizki;Stephan Tremmel;Sandro Wartzack;Dennis Christopher Hoffmann

  • Exploring the lubrication mechanisms of synovial fluids for joint longevity – A perspective

    Max Marian;Raj Shah;Blerim Gashi;Stanley Zhang

  • Discrete shape modeling for skin model representation

    Unknown

  • Designing surface textures for EHL point-contacts - Transient 3D simulations, meta-modeling and experimental validation

    Max Marian;Philipp Grützmacher;Andreas Rosenkranz;Stephan Tremmel

  • Non-Dimensional Groups, Film Thickness Equations and Correction Factors for Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication: A Review

    Max Marian;Marcel Bartz;Sandro Wartzack;Andreas Rosenkranz

  • Humidity resistant MoS2 coatings deposited by unbalanced magnetron sputtering

    Unknown

  • A discrete geometry approach for tolerance analysis of mechanism

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of the surface fatigue behavior of amorphous carbon coatings through cyclic nanoindentation

    Tim Weikert;Sandro Wartzack;Maximilian Volkan Baloglu;Kai Willner

  • Ti3C2Tx solid lubricant coatings in rolling bearings with remarkable performance beyond state-of-the-art materials

    Max Marian;Klara Feile;Benedict Rothammer;Marcel Bartz

  • Novel approaches for the assembly simulation of rigid Skin Model Shapes in tolerance analysis

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Marion Merklein
Marion Merklein University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Andreas Rosenkranz
Andreas Rosenkranz University of Chile
Karsten Durst
Karsten Durst Technical University of Darmstadt
Steffen Staab
Steffen Staab University of Stuttgart
Michael Kohlhase
Michael Kohlhase University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Simon Thiele
Simon Thiele Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg
Frieder R. Lang
Frieder R. Lang University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Ulrich Lohbauer
Ulrich Lohbauer University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Rikard Söderberg
Rikard Söderberg Chalmers University of Technology
Anselm Petschelt
Anselm Petschelt University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens a range of career opportunities, but many students also consider related fields that complement their skills. For example, fields like speech-language pathology (SLP) offer unique pathways for those interested in healthcare or communication technologies.

Choosing the right program can be challenging. If you're exploring SLP programs, understanding how many slp grad schools should i apply to is crucial to maximize acceptance chances without overwhelming yourself.

Some may prefer less competitive options, so reviewing the easiest slp masters to get into can help narrow down programs that align with your goals and academic profile.

Cost is always a key factor. Investigating speech pathology online program cost helps ensure you select a program that fits your budget, especially when considering online options that offer flexibility.

For veterans, special considerations apply. Many institutions provide tailored support and benefits, making resources like speech pathology programs online for veterans an important reference point for those transitioning from military service.

Best Scientists Citing Sandro Wartzack

Recently Published Articles