World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
39
Citations
5634
World Ranking
2142
National Ranking
75

Rudibert King publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rudibert King sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 114 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 61 scientists 317–326 publications: 69 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 274 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Rudibert King D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rudibert King sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 125 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 106 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Single-particle fracture under impact loading

    Unknown

  • Feedback shear layer control for bluff body drag reduction

    Mark Pastoor;Lars Henning;Bernd R. Noack;Rudibert King

  • Adaptive Closed-Loop Separation Control on a High-Lift Configuration Using Extremum Seeking

    Unknown

  • Modeling of particle fracture by repeated impacts using continuum damage mechanics

    Unknown

  • Model-based Control of Vortex Shedding Using Low-dimensional Galerkin Models

    Johannes Gerhard;Mark Pastoor;Rudibert King;Bernd Noack

  • Combined Feedback–Feedforward Control of Wind Turbines Using State-Constrained Model Predictive Control

    Unknown

  • Active Separation Control with Pulsed Jets in a Critically Loaded Compressor Cascade

    Unknown

  • A model for the quantitative estimation of mineral liberation by grinding

    Unknown

  • A generalized mean-field model of the natural and high-frequency actuated flow around a high-lift configuration

    Dirk M. Luchtenburg;Bert Günther;Bernd R. Noack;Rudibert King

  • Advanced algorithms for gradient estimation in one- and two-parameter extremum seeking controllers

    Gregor Gelbert;Jonas P. Moeck;Christian O. Paschereit;Rudibert King

  • Measurement of fracture energy during single-particle fracture

    Unknown

  • Understanding and controlling filamentous growth of fungal cell factories: novel tools and opportunities for targeted morphology engineering.

    Vera Meyer;Timothy Cairns;Lars Barthel;Rudibert King

  • Closed-Loop Control of Lift for Longitudinal Gust Suppression at Low Reynolds Numbers

    Wesley Kerstens;Jens Pfeiffer;David Williams;Rudibert King

  • Extensions of adaptive slope-seeking for active flow control

    Unknown

  • Simulation of ore dressing plants

    Unknown

  • State–space modeling for control based on physics-informed neural networks

    Unknown

  • Robust control of separated shear flows in simulation and experiment

    Unknown

  • The effect of particle size distribution on the performance of a phosphate flotation process

    Unknown

  • Flexible automation with compact NMR spectroscopy for continuous production of pharmaceuticals.

    Simon Kern;Simon Kern;Lukas Wander;Klas Meyer;Svetlana Guhl

  • Feedback control of unstable thermoacoustic modes in an annular Rijke tube

    Gregor Gelbert;Jonas P. Moeck;Christian O. Paschereit;Rudibert King

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering is a highly specialized field, exploring related online degrees can offer alternative or complementary career options. For instance, degree programs in counseling can provide valuable skills for leadership and team management in engineering projects. To find options that balance quality with accessibility, consider reviewing the best easiest counseling degree programs.

Additionally, the growing demand for behavior analysis skills in tech and human factors roles makes applied behavior analysis an intriguing choice. Those interested may want to check out the quickest online ABA masters program for flexible, accelerated learning paths.

For students considering speech-language pathology (SLP) as a supplementary or alternate career path, understanding the admission landscape is crucial. The SLP acceptance rate can vary significantly by program, so being informed helps in strategic application planning.

If gaining entry into SLP programs presents challenges, exploring the easiest SLP grad schools to get into may offer a more attainable route into the profession, allowing you to adapt your career trajectory smoothly.

Recently Published Articles