World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
23
Citations
3125
World Ranking
1758
National Ranking
883

Robert W. Oldendick publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Oldendick sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 43 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Robert W. Oldendick D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Oldendick sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 23 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert W. Oldendick is affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research contributions are situated primarily within the Social Sciences, with a focus on the subfield of Sociology and Political Science.

Their scholarly work centers around topics such as Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice, as well as Social and Cultural Dynamics. These areas reflect an interest in understanding the ongoing patterns and structures within societies and the dynamics that influence cultural and social changes.

Oldendick's recent publications include the following paper:

  • Public Opinion. By David L. Weakliem. Medford, Mass.: Polity Press, 2020. Pp. viii+184. $64.95 (cloth) $22.95 (paper)., published in 2021 in the American Journal of Sociology

The American Journal of Sociology is also the primary venue where Oldendick's work has appeared, marking this publication as a key platform for their research dissemination.

There are no frequent coauthors listed for Oldendick, indicating either solo authorship or a broad collaboration network without recurring partners.

Best Publications

  • Opinions on Fictitious Issues: The Pressure to Answer Survey Questions

    George F. Bishop;Alfred J. Tuchfarber;Robert W. Oldendick

  • Pseudo-Opinions on Public Affairs

    George F. Bishop;Robert W. Oldendick;Alfred J. Tuchfarber;Stephen E. Bennett

  • Help-seeking for intimate partner violence and forced sex in South Carolina.

    Ann L Coker;Christina Derrick;Julia L Lumpkin;Timothy E Aldrich

  • Population-Based Survey of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Usage, Patient Satisfaction, and Physician Involvement

    Robert Oldendick;Ann L. Coker;Darryl Wieland;James I. Raymond

  • Change in the Structure of American Political Attitudes: The Nagging Question of Question Wording

    George F. Bishop;Alfred J. Tuchfarber;Robert W. Oldendick

  • Effects of Filter Questions in Public Opinion Surveys

    George F. Bishop;Robert W. Oldendick;Alfred J. Tuchfarber

  • What Must My Interest in Politics Be If I Just Told You “I Don't Know”?

    George F. Bishop;Robert W. Oldendick;Alfred Tuchfarber

  • Effects of Question Wording and Format on Political Attitude Consistency

    George F. Bishop;Robert W. Oldendick;Alfred J. Tuchfarber

  • Public Opinion: Measuring the American Mind

    Barbara A. Bardes;Robert W Oldendick

  • Social Construction and White Attitudes toward Equal Opportunity and Multiculturalism

    Michael W. Link;Robert W. Oldendick

  • Mass and Elite Foreign Policy Opinions

    Robert W. Oldendick;Barbara Ann Bardes

  • Beyond Internationalism: A Case for Multiple Dimensions in the Structure of Foreign Policy Attitudes.

    Barbara Bardes;Robert Oldendick

  • Political Information Processing: Question Order and Context Effects

    George F. Bishop;Robert W. Oldendick;Alfred J. Tuchfarber

  • THE ANSWERING MACHINE GENERATION: WHO ARE THEY AND WHAT PROBLEM DO THEY POSE FOR SURVEY RESEARCH?

    Robert W. Oldendick;Michael W. Link

  • Call Screening: Is It Really a Problem for Survey Research?

    Michael W. Link;Robert W. Oldendick

  • Effects of Presenting One Versus Two Sides of an Issue in Survey Questions

    George F. Bishop;Robert W. Oldendick;Alfred J. Tuchfarber

  • Evaluation of the quality of care in the clinical care centers of the National Centers of Excellence in Women's Health.

    Roger T Anderson;Carol S Weisman;Sarah Hudson Scholle;Jillian T Henderson

  • The role of survey research in the benchmarking process

    Michael W. Link;Robert W. Oldendick

  • Intimate Partner Violence Among Men and Women in South Carolina, 1998

    Ann L. Coker;Christina Derrick;Julia L. Lumpkin;Robert Oldendick

  • Interest in political campaigns: The influence of question order and electoral context

    George F. Bishop;Robert W. Oldendick;Alfred J. Tuchfarber

  • Experiments in filtering political opinions

    George F. Bishop;Robert W. Oldendick;Alfred J. Tuchfarber

  • Comparing nanoparticle risk perceptions to other known EHS risks

    David M. Berube;Christopher L. Cummings;Jordan H. Frith;Andrew R. Binder

  • The Changing Structure of Mass Belief Systems: Fact or Artifact?

    George F. Bishop;Robert W. Oldendick;Alfred J. Tuchfarber;Stephen E. Bennett

Frequent Co-Authors

Ann L. Coker
Ann L. Coker University of Kentucky
Robert F. Valois
Robert F. Valois University of South Carolina
Caroline A. Macera
Caroline A. Macera San Diego State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science opens doors to several online degree and career options. Many students choose to boost their credentials with online certifications that pay well. These short programs can quickly enhance your resume or provide entry points into specialized fields.

If you're looking to advance your education quickly, quick masters degrees are available in areas like public policy, international relations, and administration. These allow you to gain valuable expertise without years of study.

Cost is a key concern for many learners. Exploring the most affordable online colleges can help you earn a quality degree without major financial strain. Many top-ranked programs now offer flexible and budget-friendly options.

Political science also overlaps with other disciplines. Careers in public affairs, policy, or environmental advocacy are popular–especially since there are high paying jobs for environmental studies majors that complement a political science background.

Best Scientists Citing Robert W. Oldendick

Trending Scientists