World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert M. Freund

Robert M. Freund

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
30
Citations
3103
World Ranking
3556
National Ranking
1375

Robert M. Freund publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Freund sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 133 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Robert M. Freund D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Freund sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Relatively Smooth Convex Optimization by First-Order Methods, and Applications

    Haihao Lu;Robert M. Freund;Yurii E. Nesterov

  • Computation of Minimum-Volume Covering Ellipsoids

    Unknown

  • Review of A mathematical view of interior-point methods in convex optimization, by James Renegar, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA

    Robert M. Freund

  • New analysis and results for the Frank–Wolfe method

    Unknown

  • On the complexity of four polyhedral set containment problems

    Robert Michael Freund;James B. Orlin

  • Some characterizations and properties of the “distance to ill-posedness” and the condition measure of a conic linear system

    Unknown

  • Condition-Based Complexity of Convex Optimization in Conic Linear Form via the Ellipsoid Algorithm

    Unknown

  • Interior Point Methods: Current Status and Future Directions

    Unknown

  • Solution Methodologies for the Smallest Enclosing Circle Problem

    Unknown

  • Condition number complexity of an elementary algorithm for computing a reliable solution of a conic linear system

    Unknown

  • A constructive proof of Tucker's combinatorial lemma

    Robert M Freund;Michael J Todd

  • Computational Experience and the Explanatory Value of Condition Measures for Linear Optimization

    Fernando Ordóñez;Robert M. Freund

  • Polynomial-time algorithms for linear programming based only on primal scaling and projected gradients of a potential function

    Unknown

  • Bandgap optimization of two-dimensional photonic crystals using semidefinite programming and subspace methods

    H. Men;N. C. Nguyen;R. M. Freund;P. A. Parrilo

  • A New Condition Measure, Preconditioners, and Relations Between Different Measures of Conditioning for Conic Linear Systems

    Unknown

  • Identifying the set of always-active constraints in a system of linear inequalities by a single linear program

    Unknown

  • Dual gauge programs, with applications to quadratic programming and the minimum-norm problem

    Unknown

  • Condition measures and properties of the central trajectory of a linear program

    Unknown

  • Optimal scaling of balls and polyhedra

    Unknown

  • Postoptimal analysis of a linear program under simultaneous changes in matrix coefficients

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in mathematics, there are numerous online degree options that complement analytical and quantitative skills. For example, pursuing a master of finance online can open doors in financial modeling, risk analysis, and investment banking, leveraging strong mathematical foundations.

Those aiming to blend business acumen with quantitative expertise might consider accelerated business degrees. Exploring accelerated online mba programs offers a quicker path to leadership roles while building on mathematical problem-solving skills.

Another dynamic field is digital marketing, which increasingly relies on data analytics and metrics. A masters in digital marketing can help sharpen abilities to analyze consumer data and optimize campaigns effectively.

For those seeking intensive business education, the best 1 year mba programs provide focused curricula that integrate quantitative skills with strategic decision-making, preparing graduates for diverse career paths that value mathematical expertise.

Recently Published Articles