World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
36
Citations
12830
World Ranking
2572
National Ranking
103

Robert M. Corless publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Corless sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 243 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Robert M. Corless D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Corless sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert M. Corless is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Mathematics, where they have contributed to numerous publications focused on computational theory, numerical analysis, and mathematical topics.

The main fields of study associated with Robert M. Corless include:

  • Computer Science
  • Mathematics

The subfields of study encompass:

  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Numerical Analysis
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Geometry and Topology
  • Mathematical Physics

Their work covers a range of topics:

  • Polynomial and algebraic computation
  • Numerical methods for differential equations
  • Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
  • Numerical Methods and Algorithms
  • Matrix Theory and Algorithms
  • Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Graph theory and applications

Frequent collaborators of Robert M. Corless include Eunice Y. S. Chan, Neil J. Calkin, David J. Jeffrey, Leili Rafiee Sevyeri, and Juana Sendra.

The main venues for their publications are:

  • Maple Transactions
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SIAM Review
  • AIMS Mathematics
  • Numerical Algorithms

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Robert M. Corless include:

  • "Blends have decent numerical properties," 2023, Maple Transactions
  • "Chaos Game Representation," 2023, SIAM Review
  • "Computation and Applications of Mathieu Functions: A Historical Perspective," 2021, SIAM Review
  • "Some Facts and Conjectures about Mandelbrot Polynomials," 2021, Maple Transactions
  • "Proceedings of the Maple Conference 2021," 2022, Maple Transactions

Robert M. Corless has contributed to book publications available through Springer Science+Business Media and the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. Titles include:

  • "Maple in Mathematics Education and Research," 2021
  • "Computational Discovery on Jupyter," 2023

Best Publications

  • On the Lambert W function

    Robert M. Corless;Gaston H. Gonnet;D. E. G. Hare;David J. Jeffrey

  • Some applications of the Lambert W function to physics

    Sree R. Valluri;David J. Jeffrey;Robert M. Corless

  • The singular value decomposition for polynomial systems

    Robert M. Corless;Patrizia M. Gianni;Barry M. Trager;Stephen M. Watt

  • A sequence of series for the Lambert W function

    Robert M. Corless;David J. Jeffrey;Donald E. Knuth

  • A Graduate Introduction to Numerical Methods

    Robert M. Corless;Nicolas Fillion

  • Compact finite difference method for integro-differential equations

    Jichao Zhao;Robert M. Corless

  • QR factoring to compute the GCD of univariate approximate polynomials

    R.M. Corless;S.M. Watt;Lihong Zhi

  • Approximate and real trajectories for generic dynamical systems

    R.M. Corless;S.Y. Pilyugin

  • Linearization of matrix polynomials expressed in polynomial bases

    A. Amiraslani;R. M. Corless;P. Lancaster

  • A model of the combined effects of vortex-induced oscillation and galloping

    R.M. Corless;G.V. Parkinson

  • A reordered Schur factorization method for zero-dimensional polynomial systems with multiple roots

    Robert M. Corless;Patrizia M. Gianni;Barry M. Trager

  • Compact finite difference method for American option pricing

    Jichao Zhao;Matt Davison;Robert M. Corless

  • Initial value problems for ODEs in problem solving environments

    L. F. Shampine;Robert M. Corless

  • Continued fractions and chaos

    R. M. Corless

  • Emerging Tools for Experimental Mathematics

    Jonathan M. Borwein;Robert M. Corless

  • Numerical Implicitization of Parametric Hypersurfaces with Linear Algebra

    Robert M. Corless;Mark Giesbrecht;Ilias S. Kotsireas;Stephen M. Watt

  • Towards factoring bivariate approximate polynomials

    Robert M. Corless;Mark W. Giesbrecht;Mark van Hoeij;Ilias S. Kotsireas

  • Numerical methods can suppress chaos

    R.M. Corless;C. Essex;M.A.H. Nerenberg

  • Optimization strategies for the approximate GCD problem

    Paulina Chin;Robert M. Corless;George F. Corliss

  • On Lambert's W Function

    Robert M. Corless;Gaston Gonnet;D. E. G. Hare;David J. Jeffrey

  • Advances in Computational Mathematics

    Robert M. Corless;Gaston Gonnet;D. E. G. Hare;David J. Jeffrey

  • In Computer Algebra Handbook

    Robert M. Corless;Erich Kaltofen;Stephen M. Watt

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan M. Borwein
Jonathan M. Borwein University of Newcastle Australia
Donald E. Knuth
Donald E. Knuth Stanford University
Peter Borwein
Peter Borwein Simon Fraser University
Pei Yu
Pei Yu University of Western Ontario
John C. Butcher
John C. Butcher University of Auckland
Lawrence F. Shampine
Lawrence F. Shampine Southern Methodist University
Erich Kaltofen
Erich Kaltofen North Carolina State University
Nicholas J. Higham
Nicholas J. Higham University of Manchester
Peter Lancaster
Peter Lancaster University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, pursuing related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many opt for business-focused programs like year long mba programs to develop leadership skills while leveraging their analytical background.

When considering online MBA options, transfer credits can be a major advantage. Programs that accept transfer credits allow students to save time and reduce costs, making flexible study more accessible. Explore transfer credits for online mba programs to identify the best fits for your academic history.

In addition to business degrees, a rapidly growing field for math graduates is data analytics. Finding the best masters in data analytics programs can provide specialized training in handling big data, boosting employability in tech, finance, and research sectors.

For those newly exploring graduate options, understanding what mba programs can i get into is crucial. This helps set realistic expectations about admission criteria based on your academic and professional profile.

Overall, aligning your math skills with strategic online degrees enhances career flexibility and opens doors to dynamic industries.

Best Scientists Citing Robert M. Corless

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles