World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 32 3424 3116 1846 1627 105 5319

Robert Innes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert Innes between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert Innes published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2008. 6 of the 122 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2008. 1986: 2 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
1986 2025

122 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert Innes: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 2
1987 5
1988 1
1989 2
1990 4
1991 2
1992 3
1993 7
1994 4
1995 1
1996 3
1997 1
1998 2
1999 8
2000 4
2001 7
2002 2
2003 5
2004 2
2005 2
2006 8
2007 3
2008 10
2009 5
2010 3
2011 0
2012 0
2013 6
2014 1
2015 1
2016 1
2017 3
2018 2
2019 2
2020 0
2021 1
2022 2
2023 1
2024 3
2025 3
Total 122
Download as CSV

Robert Innes publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Innes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 102–106 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 105 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97 105
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

Robert Innes D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Innes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157 32
33 178
34 171
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97
44 115
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert Innes is affiliated with the University of California, Merced in the United States. Their work primarily spans the field of Social Sciences, with a focus on several subfields including Safety Research, Demography, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, and General Decision Sciences.

Their research topics include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Culture, Economy, and Development Studies, Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Vitamin D Research Studies, and Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research.

Robert Innes has published in various academic venues, among the most frequent are AEA Randomized Controlled Trials, Journal of Economic Psychology, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Fordham University Press eBooks, and Proceedings of The Nutrition Society.

Notable recent papers by Robert Innes include:

  • Does deception raise or lower lie aversion? Experimental evidence, 2022, Journal of Economic Psychology
  • A year in the public life of COVID-19 and vitamin D: representation in UK news and social media and implications for future health communications, 2022, Proceedings of The Nutrition Society

Other papers coauthored by or associated with their collaborations include:

  • Machiavelli Preferences Without Blame: Delegating Selfish vs. Generous Decisions in Dictator Games, 2020, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
  • Contents, 2020, Fordham University Press eBooks
  • Issue Information - Editorial Board, 2023, Anaesthesia

Their frequent coauthors include Glynis Gawn, Sandra L. Barnes, Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein, Bernadette Doykos, and Nina Martin.

Best Publications

  • Limited liability and incentive contracting with ex-ante action choices

    Unknown

  • Environmental innovation and environmental performance

    Carmen E. Carrión-Flores;Robert Innes

  • Voluntary Pollution Reductions and the Enforcement of Environmental Law: An Empirical Study of the 33/50 Program

    Robert Innes;Abdoul G. Sam

  • Takings, Compensation and Endangered Species Protection on Private Lands

    Robert Innes;Stephen Polasky;John Tschirhart

  • Remediation and self-reporting in optimal law enforcement

    Robert Innes

  • Why Economics Matters for Endangered Species Protection

    Jason F. Shogren;John Tschirhart;Terry Anderson;Amy Whritenour Ando

  • Strategic buyers and exclusionary contracts

    Richard Sexton;Robert Innes

  • The Economics of Livestock Waste and Its Regulation

    Robert Innes

  • A Theory of Consumer Boycotts under Symmetric Information and Imperfect Competition

    Robert Innes

  • Violator Avoidance Activities and Self‐Reporting in Optimal Law Enforcement

    Robert Innes

  • Investment and government intervention in credit markets when there is asymmetric information

    Robert Innes;Robert Innes

  • Regulating Automobile Pollution under Certainty, Competition, and Imperfect Information

    Robert Innes

  • Inducing Innovation in the Environmental Technology of Oligopolistic Firms

    Robert Innes;Joseph J Bial

  • Do voluntary pollution reduction programs (VPRs) spur or deter environmental innovation? Evidence from 33/50

    Carmen E. Carrión-Flores;Robert Innes;Abdoul G. Sam

  • The Economics of Takings and Compensation When Land and Its Public Use Value Are in Private Hands

    Unknown

  • Self‐Policing and Optimal Law Enforcement When Violator Remediation is Valuable

    Robert Innes

  • Self-Reporting in Optimal Law Enforcement When Violators Have Heterogeneous Probabilities of Apprehension

    Robert Innes

  • Economic Incentives and Residential Waste Management in Taiwan: An Empirical Investigation

    Hai-Lan Yang;Robert Innes

  • Enforcement costs, optimal sanctions, and the choice between ex-post liability and ex-ante regulation

    Robert Innes

  • Takings, Compensation, and Equal Treatment for Owners of Developed and Undeveloped Property

    Unknown

  • Voluntary Pollution Reduction Programs, Environmental Management, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Study

    Abdoul G. Sam;Abdoul G. Sam;Abdoul G. Sam;Madhu Khanna;Robert Innes;Robert Innes;Robert Innes

  • Stochastic pollution, costly sanctions, and optimality of emission permit banking

    Robert Innes

  • Customer coalitions, monopoly price discrimination and generic entry deterrence

    Robert Innes;Richard J. Sexton

Frequent Co-Authors

John Tschirhart
John Tschirhart University of Wyoming
Jason F. Shogren
Jason F. Shogren University of Wyoming
Stephen Polasky
Stephen Polasky University of Minnesota
David S. Brookshire
David S. Brookshire University of New Mexico
Richard J. Sexton
Richard J. Sexton University of California, Davis
Catherine L. Kling
Catherine L. Kling Cornell University
Madhu Khanna
Madhu Khanna University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Gordon C. Rausser
Gordon C. Rausser University of California, Berkeley
Steven R. Beissinger
Steven R. Beissinger University of California, Berkeley
David Zilberman
David Zilberman University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Economics and Finance opens doors to a variety of career paths, but online learning can make your journey more flexible and accessible. If you're considering broadening your skills, you might wonder, is a project management degree worth it? This degree can boost your ability to lead teams and handle complex financial projects, adding real value in today’s job market.

For those seeking quick advancement, accelerated finance degrees offer a fast track to essential knowledge. These intensive online programs let you earn a respected credential in less time, so you can pivot into finance careers sooner.

Professionals aiming for leadership roles can consider the top accelerated mba programs. These programs provide advanced business and economic expertise in a condensed format, suitable for fast-paced career growth.

If you prefer foundational skills, check out the best bookkeeping courses. These certificates can help you master the basics of financial record-keeping, opening doors to entry-level roles or supporting entrepreneurial ventures.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Innes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles