World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Qiong Yan

Qiong Yan

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
8270
World Ranking
11472
National Ranking
1423

Qiong Yan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Qiong Yan sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 80 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Qiong Yan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Qiong Yan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Hierarchical Saliency Detection

    Qiong Yan;Li Xu;Jianping Shi;Jiaya Jia

  • Structure extraction from texture via relative total variation

    Li Xu;Qiong Yan;Yang Xia;Jiaya Jia

  • Hierarchical Image Saliency Detection on Extended CSSD

    Jianping Shi;Qiong Yan;Li Xu;Jiaya Jia

  • Cascade Residual Learning: A Two-Stage Convolutional Neural Network for Stereo Matching

    Jiahao Pang;Wenxiu Sun;Jimmy Sj. Ren;Chengxi Yang

  • Accurate Single Stage Detector Using Recurrent Rolling Convolution

    Jimmy Ren;Xiaohao Chen;Jianbo Liu;Wenxiu Sun

  • Dual Student: Breaking the Limits of the Teacher in Semi-Supervised Learning

    Zhanghan Ke;Daoye Wang;Qiong Yan;Jimmy Ren

  • Guided Collaborative Training for Pixel-Wise Semi-Supervised Learning

    Zhanghan Ke;Di Qiu;Kaican Li;Qiong Yan

  • BeautyGAN: Instance-level Facial Makeup Transfer with Deep Generative Adversarial Network

    Tingting Li;Ruihe Qian;Chao Dong;Si Liu

  • NTIRE 2018 Challenge on Spectral Reconstruction from RGB Images

    Boaz Arad;Ohad Ben-Shahar;Radu Timofte;Luc Van Gool

  • MODNet: Real-Time Trimap-Free Portrait Matting via Objective Decomposition

    Unknown

  • Deep Edge-Aware Filters

    Li Xu;Jimmy Ren;Qiong Yan;Renjie Liao

  • Hierarchical Regression Network for Spectral Reconstruction from RGB Images

    Yuzhi Zhao;Lai-Man Po;Qiong Yan;Wei Liu

  • Shepard convolutional neural networks

    Jimmy Sj. Ren;Li Xu;Qiong Yan;Wenxiu Sun

  • FAST-VQA: Efficient End-to-End Video Quality Assessment with Fragment Sampling

    Unknown

  • TOPIQ: A Top-Down Approach From Semantics to Distortions for Image Quality Assessment

    Unknown

  • Cross-Field Joint Image Restoration via Scale Map

    Qiong Yan;Xiaoyong Shen;Li Xu;Shaojie Zhuo

  • Look, listen and learn — a multimodal LSTM for speaker identification

    Jimmy Ren;Yongtao Hu;Yu-Wing Tai;Chuan Wang

  • Polarized Reflection Removal With Perfect Alignment in the Wild

    Unknown

  • A sparse control model for image and video editing

    Li Xu;Qiong Yan;Jiaya Jia

  • DisCoVQA: Temporal Distortion-Content Transformers for Video Quality Assessment

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Li Xu
Li Xu SenseTime
Jimmy Ren
Jimmy Ren Hong Kong Metropolitan University
Jiaya Jia
Jiaya Jia Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Rynson W. H. Lau
Rynson W. H. Lau City University of Hong Kong
Qifeng Chen
Qifeng Chen Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Radu Timofte
Radu Timofte University of Wurzburg
Yu-Wing Tai
Yu-Wing Tai Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Jianping Shi
Jianping Shi SenseTime
A. N. Rajagopalan
A. N. Rajagopalan Indian Institute of Technology Madras
Chao Dong
Chao Dong Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Qiong Yan

Recently Published Articles