World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
30
Citations
4806
World Ranking
3465
National Ranking
44

Piet Groeneboom publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piet Groeneboom sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 134 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Piet Groeneboom D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piet Groeneboom sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Wald Memorial Lecturer

Overview

Piet Groeneboom is affiliated with the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on mathematics, with an emphasis on statistics and probability. The scientist's work covers a range of subfields including statistics and probability, artificial intelligence, global and planetary change, statistics, probability and uncertainty, and finance.

Their main topics of study include statistical methods and inference, Bayesian methods and mixture models, statistical methods and Bayesian inference, advanced statistical methods and models, statistical distribution estimation and applications, hydrology and drought analysis, and advanced statistical process monitoring.

Groeneboom has published extensively, with notable recent papers such as:

  • "Confidence intervals in monotone regression," 2024, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics
  • "Estimation of the incubation time distribution in the singly and doubly interval censored model," 2024, Statistica Neerlandica
  • "Confidence intervals in monotone regression," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Grenander functionals and Cauchy's formula," 2020, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics
  • "Estimation of the incubation time distribution for COVID-19," 2020, Statistica Neerlandica

Frequent publication venues for Groeneboom include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Scandinavian Journal of Statistics
  • Statistica Neerlandica
  • Electronic Journal of Statistics

Among their frequent co-authors are Geurt Jongbloed and Fadoua Balabdaoui.

Groeneboom was recognized as a Wald Memorial Lecturer in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Information Bounds and Nonparametric Maximum Likelihood Estimation

    Piet Groeneboom;Jon A. Wellner

  • Brownian motion with a parabolic drift and airy functions

    Piet Groeneboom

  • Nonparametric Estimation under Shape Constraints

    Piet Groeneboom;Geurt Jongbloed

  • Estimating a monotone density

    P. Groeneboom

  • Estimation of a convex function: characterizations and asymptotic theory.

    Piet Groeneboom;Geurt Jongbloed;Jon A. Wellner

  • Large Deviation Theorems for Empirical Probability Measures

    P. Groeneboom;J. Oosterhoff;F. H. Ruymgaart

  • Computing Chernoff's Distribution

    Piet Groeneboom;Jon A Wellner

  • Nonparametric Estimation under Shape Constraints

    Piet Groeneboom;Geurt Jongbloed

  • Limit theorems for convex hulls

    Piet Groeneboom

  • The Concave Majorant of Brownian Motion

    Piet Groeneboom

  • The support reduction algorithm for computing non-parametric function estimates in mixture models

    Piet Groeneboom;Geurt Jongbloed;Jon A. Wellner

  • Lectures on inverse problems

    Piet Groeneboom

  • A canonical process for estimation of convex functions: the "invelope" of integrated Brownian motion + t4.

    Piet Groeneboom;Geurt Jongbloed;J. O. N. A. Wellner

  • Second class particles and cube root asymptotics for Hammersley's process

    Eric Cator;Piet Groeneboom

  • Asymptotically optimal estimation of smooth functionals for interval censoring, case 2

    Ronald Geskus;Piet Groeneboom

  • Kernel-type estimators for the extreme value index

    P. Groeneboom;H.P. Lopuhaä;P.P. de Wolf

  • Isotonic Estimation and Rates of Convergence in Wicksell's Problem

    Piet Groeneboom;Geurt Jongbloed

  • Limit theorems for functionals of convex hulls

    A. J. Cabo;P. Groeneboom

  • MAXIMUM SMOOTHED LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION AND SMOOTHED MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION IN THE CURRENT STATUS MODEL

    Piet Groeneboom;Geurt Jongbloed;Birgit I. Witte

  • Bahadur efficiency and probabilities of large deviations

    P. Groeneboom;J. Oosterhoff

  • Current status data with competing risks: Consistency and rates of convergence of the MLE

    Piet Groeneboom;Marloes H. Maathuis;Jon A. Wellner

  • The suppport reduction algorithm for computing nonparametric function estimates in mixture models

    Piet Groeneboom;Geurt Jongbloed;Jon A. Wellner

  • A canonical process for estimation of convex functions: the "invelope" of integrated Brownian motion + t4.

    G. Jongbloed;P. Groeneboom;J.A. Wellner

Frequent Co-Authors

Jon A. Wellner
Jon A. Wellner University of Washington
Richard D. Gill
Richard D. Gill Leiden University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring Mathematics in the USA, branching into related fields can enhance career prospects and skill sets. Many graduates pursue an online marketing degree to develop analytical and data-driven marketing skills, bridging the gap between numbers and consumer behavior.

If leadership and business management appeal, numerous 1 year MBA programs in usa offer an accelerated path to gain strategic business knowledge. These programs often accommodate students aiming to complement their mathematical expertise with essential managerial skills.

Flexibility is also key, as many professionals leverage online MBA programs that accept transfer credits. This allows students to build on previous coursework, making it easier to earn advanced degrees without starting from scratch.

Additionally, the surge in data-driven industries has boosted the demand for advanced quantitative abilities found in programs like the MS in data analytics. This degree complements mathematics study by focusing on practical data interpretation and decision-making skills.

Best Scientists Citing Piet Groeneboom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles