World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter R. Cobbold

Peter R. Cobbold

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
73
Citations
18778
World Ranking
796
National Ranking
40

Peter R. Cobbold publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter R. Cobbold sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 188 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Peter R. Cobbold D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter R. Cobbold sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Composite material
  • Tectonics
  • Sedimentary rock

Paleontology, Tectonics, Seismology, Clockwise and Shear are his primary areas of study. His works in Sedimentary rock, Paleogene, Continental margin and Foreland basin are all subjects of inquiry into Paleontology. Peter R. Cobbold combines subjects such as Source rock and Cretaceous with his study of Sedimentary rock.

His Tectonics research incorporates elements of Kinematics, Sill, Crust, Quaternary and Compression. His work in Seismology is not limited to one particular discipline; it also encompasses Structural basin. His study in Clockwise is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Paleomagnetism and Sinistral and dextral.

His most cited work include:

  • Some tectonic consequences of fluid overpressures and seepage forces as demonstrated by sandbox modelling (128 citations)
  • Relative sea-level fall since the last interglacial stage: Are coasts uplifting worldwide? (120 citations)
  • Paleogene building of the Bolivian Orocline: Tectonic restoration of the central Andes in 2‐D map view (112 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Paleontology, Tectonics, Seismology, Geomorphology and Geometry. His studies in Cretaceous, Structural basin, Foreland basin, Continental margin and Neogene are all subfields of Paleontology research. His research investigates the connection between Tectonics and topics such as Crust that intersect with problems in Brittleness.

His Seismology research includes elements of Paleomagnetism, Petrology and Clockwise. His study focuses on the intersection of Geomorphology and fields such as Subduction with connections in the field of Plate tectonics. His Geometry study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Shearing, Fold, Simple shear, Shear zone and Slip.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Paleontology (30.50%)
  • Tectonics (23.40%)
  • Seismology (21.28%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2009-2021)?

  • Paleontology (30.50%)
  • Continental margin (12.06%)
  • Petrology (12.06%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Paleontology, Continental margin, Petrology, Seismology and Tectonics. Paleogene, Cretaceous, Rift, Inversion and Structural basin are the core of his Paleontology study. His work carried out in the field of Continental margin brings together such families of science as Seafloor spreading, Ridge, Passive margin and Deformation.

His studies deal with areas such as Hydraulic fracturing, Overburden, Fracture and Source rock as well as Petrology. His Seismology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Lateral shear and Submarine pipeline. His Tectonics study incorporates themes from Geochemistry and Sill.

Between 2009 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Relative sea-level fall since the last interglacial stage: Are coasts uplifting worldwide? (120 citations)
  • Episodic burial and exhumation in NE Brazil after opening of the South Atlantic (84 citations)
  • Post‐breakup tectonics in southeast Brazil from thermochronological data and combined inverse‐forward thermal history modeling (70 citations)

Best Publications

  • Propagating extrusion tectonics in Asia: New insights from simple experiments with plasticine

    P. Tapponnier;G. Peltzer;A. Y. Le Dain;R. Armijo

  • Lateral extrusion in the eastern Alps, Part 1: Boundary conditions and experiments scaled for gravity

    Lothar Ratschbacher;Olivier Merle;Philippe Davy;Peter Cobbold

  • Development of sheath folds in shear regimes

    P.R. Cobbold;H. Quinquis

  • Experiments on shortening of a 4-layer model of the continental lithosphere

    P. Davy;P.R. Cobbold

  • Segmentation of an obliquely rifted margin, Campos and Santos basins, southeastern Brazil

    Kristian E. Meisling;Peter R. Cobbold;Van S. Mount

  • Development of internal structures in deformed anisotropic rocks

    P.R. Cobbold;J.W. Cosgrove;J.M. Summers

  • Bedding-parallel fibrous veins (beef and cone-in-cone): Worldwide occurrence and possible significance in terms of fluid overpressure, hydrocarbon generation and mineralization

    Peter Robert Cobbold;Alain Zanella;Nuno Rodrigues;Nuno Rodrigues;Helge Loseth

  • Physical models of extensional tectonics at various scales

    B. Vendeville;P. R. Cobbold;P. Davy;P. Choukroune

  • Style and pattern of salt diapirs due to thin-skinned gravitational gliding, Campos and Santos basins, offshore Brazil

    S. Demercian;P. Szatmari;P.R. Cobbold

  • Aptian to recent compressional deformation, foothills of the Neuquén Basin, Argentina

    P.R Cobbold;E.A Rossello

  • Style and history of Andean deformation, Puna plateau, northwestern Argentina

    Isabelle Coutand;Peter R. Cobbold;Marc de Urreiztieta;Pierre Gautier

  • Some tectonic consequences of fluid overpressures and seepage forces as demonstrated by sandbox modelling

    R Mourgues;P.R Cobbold

  • Relative sea-level fall since the last interglacial stage: Are coasts uplifting worldwide?

    Kevin Pedoja;Laurent Husson;Laurent Husson;Vincent Regard;Vincent Regard;Peter Robert Cobbold

  • Intense progressive shear in Ile de Groix blueschists and compatibility with subduction or obduction

    H. Quinquis;Cl. Audren;J. P. Brun;P. R. Cobbold

  • Strain heating and thermal softening in continental shear zones: a review

    J.P. Brun;P.R. Cobbold

  • Radial gravitational gliding on passive margins

    P.R. Cobbold;P. Szatmari

  • Seepage forces, important factors in the formation of horizontal hydraulic fractures and bedding-parallel fibrous veins (‘beef’ and ‘cone-in-cone’)

    P. R. Cobbold;N. Rodrigues

  • Widespread bedding-parallel veins of fibrous calcite beef in a mature source rock Vaca Muerta Fm, Neuquen Basin, Argentina; evidence for overpressure and horizontal compression

    Nuno Rodrigues;Peter R. Cobbold;Helge Loseth;Gilles Ruffet

  • Paleogene building of the Bolivian Orocline: Tectonic restoration of the central Andes in 2‐D map view

    César Arriagada;Pierrick Roperch;Pierrick Roperch;Constantino Mpodozis;Peter Cobbold

  • Salar de Atacama basin: A record of compressional tectonics in the central Andes since the mid-Cretaceous

    Cesar Arriagada;Cesar Arriagada;Peter R. Cobbold;Pierrick Roperch

  • Sedimentary basins and crustal thickening

    P.R. Cobbold;P. Davy;D. Gapais;E.A. Rossello

Frequent Co-Authors

Denis Gapais
Denis Gapais University of Rennes
Pierrick Roperch
Pierrick Roperch University of Rennes
Gilles Ruffet
Gilles Ruffet University of Rennes
Peter Japsen
Peter Japsen Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland
Fernando O. Marques
Fernando O. Marques University of Lisbon
Jean-Pierre Brun
Jean-Pierre Brun University of Rennes
Constantino Mpodozis
Constantino Mpodozis University of Chile
Annick Chauvin
Annick Chauvin University of Rennes
Kerry Gallagher
Kerry Gallagher University of Rennes
Philippe Davy
Philippe Davy University of Rennes

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career options, but supplementing your education with complementary skills can greatly enhance your job prospects. Many students explore related fields through online learning, which offers flexibility and accessibility. For instance, programs like the online degrees in Spanish can benefit Earth Science majors interested in working in international or bilingual environments.

Veterans looking to transition into Earth Science roles might find the veteran friendly online Spanish degree particularly supportive, providing tailored resources to help them succeed. Meanwhile, creative professionals or educators might consider blending science with the arts through online MFA programs, expanding their skill set for roles in communication and public outreach.

Additionally, Earth Science graduates aiming for leadership or organizational roles should explore areas like human capital development. A human resource management masters degree online can equip them with the skills needed to manage projects and teams effectively within scientific organizations.

Combining Earth Science expertise with these related online degrees can create well-rounded professionals prepared for dynamic career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Peter R. Cobbold

Recently Published Articles